Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #5060
| Path | csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | te3d4q@sigaint.org |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? |
| Date | Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:50:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <srPux-4ML-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sr6QO-8jN-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sr7a9-8qo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <srbx7-2Kh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <srctb-3jq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <srpgJ-3eb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <srytH-10O-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-security-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 13 14:48:32 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <te3d4q@sigaint.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-10.099 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.099] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -6.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Importance | Normal |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-security@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/28125 |
| List-ID | <debian-security.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/81bd9cd1a5fc808de5d7f2fc49f00541.webmail@localhost |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 13 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | "Moritz Muehlenhoff" <jmm@debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:48:06 -0000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <81bd9cd1a5fc808de5d7f2fc49f00541.webmail@localhost> |
| X-Original-References | <eae7d98cc7550642774010d3fa7fdfb4.webmail@localhost> <slrnnvq0pp.grj.jmm@inutil.org> <e13649a450ef6829f1f4d38cd6051e8d.webmail@localhost> <20161011210128.GA22554@inutil.org> <3cce61b9eed05dfe180e771e638706ca.webmail@localhost> <20161012203858.GA23365@inutil.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.security:5060 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> Of course, every distribution makes their own assessment. After > all each distro might ship an affected codebase in different > versions/configs/environments. > > Cheers, > Moritz > Hi Moritz I appreciate the time and effort that you spent on clarifying my questions. Thank you.
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 17:10 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-11 17:30 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 22:10 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 23:10 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-12 12:50 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-13 20:40 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2016-10-18 22:30 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Alexander Schreiber <als@thangorodrim.ch> - 2016-10-20 01:00 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-20 02:40 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-12 22:40 +0200
Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
csiph-web