Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5054

Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?

From Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
Date 2016-10-11 17:30 +0200
Message-ID <sr7a9-8qo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sr6QO-8jN-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Cocytus

Show all headers | View raw


te3d4q@sigaint.org <te3d4q@sigaint.org> schrieb:
> I read somewhere on a forum that for security vulnerabilities that have
> "NVD security" ratings of medium or low risk, Debian's security team may
> not issue patches/fixes for them. Only high-risk security vulnerabilities
> will be fixed. Is that correct?

No, the NVD ratings are entirely meaningless to us. In addition to security
issues fixed in DSAs, there are also minor security fixes provided via
the jessie point updates.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 17:10 +0200
  Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 22:10 +0200
      Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 23:10 +0200
        Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-12 12:50 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
              Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-13 20:40 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2016-10-18 22:30 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Alexander Schreiber <als@thangorodrim.ch> - 2016-10-20 01:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-20 02:40 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-12 22:40 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200

csiph-web