Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.security > #5060

Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?

From te3d4q@sigaint.org
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct?
Date 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
Message-ID <srPux-4ML-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <sr7a9-8qo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <srbx7-2Kh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <srctb-3jq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <srpgJ-3eb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <srytH-10O-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

> Of course, every distribution makes their own assessment. After
> all each distro might ship an affected codebase in different
> versions/configs/environments.
>
> Cheers,
>         Moritz
>

Hi Moritz

I appreciate the time and effort that you spent on clarifying my questions.

Thank you.

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 17:10 +0200
  Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-11 17:30 +0200
    Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-11 22:10 +0200
      Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 23:10 +0200
        Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-12 12:50 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-12 17:20 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200
              Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2016-10-13 20:40 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian security team, is that correct? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2016-10-18 22:30 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-19 17:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Alexander Schreiber <als@thangorodrim.ch> - 2016-10-20 01:00 +0200
                Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by Debian  security team, is that correct? Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> - 2016-10-20 02:40 +0200
          Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2016-10-12 22:40 +0200
            Re: Vulnerabilities rated medium or low risk may not be fixed by  Debian security team, is that correct? te3d4q@sigaint.org - 2016-10-13 16:50 +0200

csiph-web