Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14631

Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals
Date	Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:30:01 +0100
Message-ID	<FuiMh-5lgM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<Fu9pD-5fnn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FuisV-5l9z-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Mon Nov 21 17:25:27 2022
Old-Return-Path	<debian@kitterman.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5.5
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20491
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/E5BD6009-0D4B-4842-9FBA-C620A02671B5@kitterman.com
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	29
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:25:05 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<E5BD6009-0D4B-4842-9FBA-C620A02671B5@kitterman.com>
X-Original-References	<Y3sj9J0AYpYZoV0u@d-and-j.net> <6a68f118-391b-2e81-c325-3148a0970ef8@debian.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14631

Show key headers only | View raw


On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe Véronneau" <pollo@debian.org> wrote:
>On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
>> proceed.  Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3.11 the default
>> Python version!!
>
>This is a concern I share and I think I've been pretty vocal about it.
>
>I feel the state of python packages for Bookworm with 3.10 was pretty good and it seemed reasonable to prioritize stability for our next stable release :)
>
>It's very frustrating to work on packaging python libraries and apps for a whole release cycle, just to see all that work put in the bin at the last minute because upstream doesn't support 3.11...
>
>I've been told the current 3.11 transition was a test, and if it was clear too many important things were broken and couldn't be fixed, we would roll back and release using 3.10.
>


Looks like you can add #1024521 to the list.

Scott K

Thread

Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-21 08:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 18:10 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-11-21 18:30 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-11-22 15:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 18:40 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-11-22 09:30 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-22 11:00 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-11-22 17:10 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-22 18:00 +0100
              Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-11-23 00:30 +0100
                Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-23 08:40 +0100

csiph-web