Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14640

Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals

From Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals
Date 2022-11-23 08:40 +0100
Message-ID <FuSwq-5HQg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <FuwPf-5u96-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fuyem-5v0u-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <FuE0p-5yXi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FuEMN-5zdK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FuKSd-5D41-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 12:21:38AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/22/22 17:59, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > Or should we mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11 so they can stay in
> > > > testing as long as Python 3.10 is the default?
> > > 
> > > I don't think this is the way.
> > 
> > I'm sorry, I don't understand - which is not the way?
> 
> I don't think you should "mark them as X-Python3-Version: << 3.11", because
> either we use 3.10 or 3.11 in Bookworm, I don't think that there's a plan
> for having both interpreters available.

It's more about the present time: if I mark them as << 3.11, then they
will build fine and be able to stay in testing.  If I don't, they'll
be pulled from testing in the next few weeks because of FTBFS bugs.
Obviously, once they do build OK with 3.11, then I can remove that
clause.

Best wishes,

   Julian

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-21 08:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 18:10 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-11-21 18:30 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-11-22 15:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2022-11-21 18:40 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-11-22 09:30 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-22 11:00 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-11-22 17:10 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-22 18:00 +0100
              Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-11-23 00:30 +0100
                Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-11-23 08:40 +0100

csiph-web