Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.maint.python
Subject: Re: Python 3.11, bytecode and new internals
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 18:30:01 +0100
Message-ID: <FuiMh-5lgM-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
References: <Fu9pD-5fnn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FuisV-5l9z-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Mailbox-Line: From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org  Mon Nov 21 17:25:27 2022
Old-Return-Path: <debian@kitterman.com>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight: using cached result; rate: -5.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailing-List: <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20491
List-ID: <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/E5BD6009-0D4B-4842-9FBA-C620A02671B5@kitterman.com
Approved: robomod@news.nic.it
Lines: 29
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender: robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 17:25:05 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <E5BD6009-0D4B-4842-9FBA-C620A02671B5@kitterman.com>
X-Original-References: <Y3sj9J0AYpYZoV0u@d-and-j.net> <6a68f118-391b-2e81-c325-3148a0970ef8@debian.org>
Xref: csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14631



On November 21, 2022 5:02:57 PM UTC, "Louis-Philippe V=C3=A9ronneau" <poll=
o@debian=2Eorg> wrote:
>On 2022-11-21 02 h 08, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> I'm just flagging this up here, with a question about how we should
>> proceed=2E  Certainly we are not ready to make Python 3=2E11 the defaul=
t
>> Python version!!
>
>This is a concern I share and I think I've been pretty vocal about it=2E
>
>I feel the state of python packages for Bookworm with 3=2E10 was pretty g=
ood and it seemed reasonable to prioritize stability for our next stable re=
lease :)
>
>It's very frustrating to work on packaging python libraries and apps for =
a whole release cycle, just to see all that work put in the bin at the last=
 minute because upstream doesn't support 3=2E11=2E=2E=2E
>
>I've been told the current 3=2E11 transition was a test, and if it was cl=
ear too many important things were broken and couldn't be fixed, we would r=
oll back and release using 3=2E10=2E
>


Looks like you can add #1024521 to the list=2E

Scott K