Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14724

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?
Date	Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:40:02 +0100
Message-ID	<FCcJI-anCR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<FC0Sf-agdq-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Dec 13 12:34:37 2022
Old-Return-Path	<julian@d-and-j.net>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-7.2 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -4.6
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20590
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/Y5hxSP5g0tgi9e90@d-and-j.net
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	23
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date	Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:34:16 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<Y5hxSP5g0tgi9e90@d-and-j.net>
X-Original-References	<CAM8zJQutSSUGjSRjK+jEzd6XMtMTFBrM6dPPKpUcbnexTKADSw@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14724

Show key headers only | View raw

Hi Graham,

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 11:51:11PM +0000, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Dear Python Team
> 
> Looking at the current state of the 'adding Python 3.11 as a supported
> version' transition [1], the tracker [2] shows only 12 red packages
> (excluding unknowns and packages not in testing) remaining, copied
> below for reference.
> [...]

If Python 3.11 is the default, then it is highly likely that Spyder
will not be included: debugpy, which is a dependency of Spyder and
python3-ipykernel (and lots of things that depend on that) seems to
require major work upstream to make it fully compatible with Python
3.11.  This is work in progress, but I don't know whether it will be
ready in time for the freeze.  At the moment, I have worked around
this problem by just skipping the failing tests, but that is far from
an ideal solution.

Best wishes,

   Julian

Thread

Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 01:00 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 08:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 19:50 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 10:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2022-12-13 11:00 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 11:10 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 17:20 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-13 13:40 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
      Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-18 19:10 +0100
        Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 10:50 +0100
          Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org> - 2022-12-19 17:00 +0100
            Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-12-19 21:30 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-12-13 17:10 +0100
  Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-15 16:20 +0100
    Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm? Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-12-16 10:50 +0100

csiph-web