Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14292

Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF)

Path	csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF)
Date	Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:30:01 +0200
Message-ID	<ENQcV-ebMX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<EMrzX-dlxq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <EN1k5-dHa4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENucp-dYnS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENKqS-e8mT-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed Jul 27 14:26:52 2022
Old-Return-Path	<pollo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-11.21 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, BODY_8BITS=1.5, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5
X-Riseup-User-ID	648235CF584CB1BF1B7BF44CAD9C3E8A5E5EFA2AC6FBA67AC1261E0EB7962166
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Language	en-US
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------O25vksrr4gG0gSKHhXLRlSh6"
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20126
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/5f516bbb-cf73-11e6-0d76-f6ab9c0caac9@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	63
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:26:33 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID	<5f516bbb-cf73-11e6-0d76-f6ab9c0caac9@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<f115f75a-29b9-c5ce-fad8-eee517078724@debian.org> <Yt5Oi1Z1XT2WBq8H@d-and-j.net> <Yt//K7KcYBPGhvqk@debian.org> <YuD04oxQlwPQ2myH@d-and-j.net>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:14292

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 2022-07-27 04 h 18, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> 
> There seems to be little point running both pybuild-autopkgtest and a
> manually written debian/tests/* test suite.  So would the script only
> add pybuild-autopkgtest to packages which don't have a manually
> written debian/tests/* suite?

The way I see it:

1. We should have a Lintian tag for packages not using the new 
pybuild-autodep8 autopkgtest. It would be even better if this tag would 
be a pointed hint that identified 'manually' written unit test 
autopkgtests that could be replaced.

This way, you get something like:

python-foo source: not-using-pybuil-autodep8 [debian/tests/unittests]

for python packages that have old 'manually' written unit test 
autopkgtests and:

python-foo source: not-using-pybuild-autodep8 [no-autopkgtest]

for python packages without any autopkgtest.

2. lintian-brush (or something else, but I think lintian-brush is the 
right tool) would go over these packages to:

2.1 Add the new autodep8 autopkgtests and build the package to see if 
they pass
2.2 Remove the "manual" unit test autopkgtests if 2.1 succeeds
2.3 Open a bug report if 2.1 fails

This way, we can imagine a transition that would be mostly automated. 
We'd probably have to fix the ones that failed to migrate manually, but 
it would be much less work :)

Cheers,

-- 
   ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
   ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
   ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
   ⠈⠳⣄

Thread

Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-23 20:00 +0200
  Re: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-25 09:40 +0200
    Re: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 10:00 +0200
      Re: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 16:20 +0200
  pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-25 10:10 +0200
    Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2022-07-26 17:00 +0200
      Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-07-26 17:50 +0200
        Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2022-07-26 23:00 +0200
          Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 02:20 +0200
            Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 05:50 +0200
      Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-27 10:20 +0200
        Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 16:30 +0200
          Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-27 20:50 +0200
            Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-27 22:40 +0200
              Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-28 20:50 +0200
              Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-08-18 02:00 +0200
        Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 18:50 +0200

csiph-web