Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14297
| From | Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) |
| Date | 2022-07-28 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <EOgK5-eryz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <ENucp-dYnS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENKqS-e8mT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENQcV-ebMX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENUgx-ee5H-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <ENVYZ-ef7O-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 09:32:19PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > [...] > > > > I'd be wary about 2.2 and 2.3. I have several packages where I know > > that an automated test will fail; there are all sorts of weird cases > > [...] > > I'd be wary about adding lintian tags for this, though: with so many > packages not being able to use the autodep8 system (I vaguely recall > someone suggesting that a third of Python packages would not be able > [...] I realise that I may have come across as quite negative. Apologies if that is the case - it was not my intention. I think the autopkgtest-pkg-pybuild/pybuild-autodep8 work is very helpful and a positive addition to our infrastructure, and I'm very grateful to those who've made it happen. My only concern is with how it is introduced; because of the wide variety of Python packages and the hugely varying nature of the testsuites present in them (or not), I think that trying to force this into packages is a poor idea. (I wish that most of my packages could simply use this pybuild-autodep8 tool. I fear that this won't be the case, but I will certainly adopt it for those which can.) Best wishes, Julian
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-23 20:00 +0200
Re: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-25 09:40 +0200
Re: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 10:00 +0200
Re: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 16:20 +0200
pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-25 10:10 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2022-07-26 17:00 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2022-07-26 17:50 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2022-07-26 23:00 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 02:20 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 05:50 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-27 10:20 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 16:30 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-27 20:50 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-27 22:40 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2022-07-28 20:50 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2022-08-18 02:00 +0200
Re: pybuild-autopkgtest (was: Notes from the DC22 Python Team BoF) Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2022-07-27 18:50 +0200
csiph-web