Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #60686

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Dear Ian, Ben,

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 08:16 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 00:08 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> > > For the lzo_decompress ones I think you need to add it to
>> > > installer/modules/lzo-modules and perhaps add one or two more
>> > > dependencies based on what the errors are at that point.
>> >
>> > Let's not introduce more packages.  I would be tempted to put it in
>> > kernel-image, which all other udeb packages should depend on.
>>
>> I thought lzo-modules already existed, but perhaps my tree was out of
>> date. If it doesn't then you are right that kernel-image would be a
>> find choice.
>
> You're right, I just didn't remember it existing.

Thanks for your hints!
I also find the thread [0] that had the similar problem before.
So I learned how to fix the problem, and now the fix is in master [1]
and sid branch on salsa.

[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2014/02/msg00341.html
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/commit/175171d4

I also find the target binary-arch_armel_real of makefile fails in my
cross compiling environment, which is the reason why I couldn't build
udeb.
There's a workaround for this:
$ sed -i 's/binary-arch_armel:: binary-arch_armel_extra
binary-arch_armel_none binary-arch_armel_real/binary-arch_armel::
binary-arch_armel_extra binary-arch_armel_none/' debian/rules.gen

After that, the udeb command can be built by ($ARCH is armel for my case):
$ fakeroot make -f debian/rules.gen binary-arch_${ARCH}

Maybe it's kinda dirty hack, but works for me. I also realized that I
never used the binary-arch_armel_real target before.

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-18 05:30 +0100
  Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-01-22 15:00 +0100
    Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-23 19:40 +0100
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-01-26 19:00 +0100
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 13:50 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2018-02-17 14:20 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 13:00 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 13:00 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 19:20 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-23 00:10 +0100
        Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-24 03:00 +0100
          Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 07:50 +0200
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-03-27 14:40 +0200
              Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 22:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-03-27 22:50 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 23:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-03-28 11:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Federico Pietro Briata <federico@briata.org> - 2018-03-28 14:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-01 15:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-04-03 08:00 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 16:20 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 17:00 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-13 02:10 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 18:30 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rick Thomas <rbthomas@pobox.com> - 2018-04-02 01:50 +0200
                Re: armel/marvell kernel size Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2018-03-27 23:30 +0200
            Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-27 21:10 +0200
              Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel  size) Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-03-27 21:30 +0200
              armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size) "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org> - 2018-03-27 21:40 +0200
                Re: armel not to be released anymore? (was: armel/marvell kernel size) Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-03-28 06:40 +0200
              Re: armel/marvell kernel size Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> - 2018-03-27 22:50 +0200

csiph-web