Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #59255

Re: armel/marvell kernel size

From Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: armel/marvell kernel size
Date 2017-10-23 17:40 +0200
Message-ID <uDMZz-7uD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uCG9P-4Kh-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Dear Ben,

Thanks for the ping!

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 PM, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> Sadly, linux has again failed to build on armel in experimental due to
> the image size growing too large.

Yes, I noticed this armel FTBFS issue.
However, the solution simple solution, you mentioned in previous email
[0], has been used.
Now I think we have to touch the crypto module part, which affects
cryptsetup/initramfs-tools.
I'll try this approach this week.

[0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2017/05/msg00040.html

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-20 16:10 +0200
  Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2017-10-23 17:40 +0200
    Re: armel/marvell kernel size Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2017-10-26 23:10 +0200
      Re: armel/marvell kernel size Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> - 2017-10-29 18:20 +0100

csiph-web