Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #89828

Re: Architecture baseline for Forky

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Peter Green <plugwash@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.ports.arm, linux.debian.kernel
Subject Re: Architecture baseline for Forky
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2025 10:10:01 +0100
Message-ID <LLwPn-96Ea-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <LK8cp-85Zv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LKdON-89IL-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LKerv-8ag9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LKjKx-8dPd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <LKsNP-8k46-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LKtJT-8kLF-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <LKD6y-8sUr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LL9g5-8Q1a-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LLtRw-94j2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LLtRw-94j2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LLwPn-96Ea-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-arm-request@lists.debian.org Thu Oct 30 09:03:10 2025
Old-Return-Path <plugwash@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version 1.0
User-Agent Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language en-US
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Debian-User plugwash
X-Mailing-List <debian-arm@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/25036
List-ID <debian-arm.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/84339331-7bdc-41a0-8bf6-98f2713c2336@debian.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 30
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc debian-arm@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-toolchain@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:47:25 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID <84339331-7bdc-41a0-8bf6-98f2713c2336@debian.org>
X-Original-References <20251026122129.qhuo7s5y6ezbmyh7@shell.thinkmo.de> <C270F881-3BA7-4501-9BAD-C7C32797F71F@gmail.com> <aP5yiDbM3PwYSN4K@bongo.bofh.it> <f61cb992-7847-4d41-b9c1-9eeaa3a0a53a@aol.de> <66bcd332-17f5-41d0-985f-a30a82560798@juszkiewicz.com.pl> <aP9X9A0Vy9Td8jDP@localhost> <13816324-150f-4180-8182-2ea9c250e924@app.fastmail.com> <aQHEwUgfWS4wCI1Z@localhost> <57c5f44d-4714-4e94-9dcb-751a6b336d80@app.fastmail.com> <c5bde8e0-8cd2-4be6-8e17-444be46d72c5@debian.org> <9506b61d-049c-477e-93da-e6f213ccc799@app.fastmail.com>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.ports.arm:14265 linux.debian.kernel:89828

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On 30/10/2025 08:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, at 06:39, Peter Green wrote:
>> On 29/10/2025 13:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>>   > 5. armv6k+vfpv3d16: Most ARMv6/v7 machines, including Raspberry
>>   >     Pi zero/1 but not OMAP2 (Nokia N800/N810). Loses THUMB2 support
>>   >     and v7/v8 CPU barriers among other minor differences.
>>
>> As maintainer of raspbian, I can say the memory barrier issue is
>> one of the bigger thorns in our side and is the reason we continue
>> to configure gcc for armv6 rather than armv6k.
>>
>> For the uninitiated, arm added memory barrier instructions in armv6k,
>> as instructions on the system coprocessor (aka CP15). When targetting
>> armv6k, compilers use these instructions to implement
>> acquire/release/seqcst atomics.
>>
>> With armv7-a, arm deprecated the CP15 barriers and introduced the
>> dmb instruction.
>>
>> The problem is that arm64 kernels by default trap the armv6k memory
>> barriers into the kernel and emulate them. Asside from being slow
>> this can also cause hangs if the optimiser moves a barrier inside
>> a load-exclusive/store-exclusive loop.
> Right, this is very unfortunate, and I suspect that this is something
> we should change in both the arm64 kernel and in the compiler. If
> you can point me to specific userspace code that has this problem,
> I can probably come up with a kernel patch to work around it,
> at least if that userspace code isn't obviously wrong.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53670

Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-26 13:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2025-10-26 14:20 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 08:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez <unixpro1970@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 19:40 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2025-10-26 20:30 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 12:50 +0100
      Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 18:10 +0100
      Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2025-10-27 22:40 +0100
        Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-29 09:00 +0100
          Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 07:00 +0100
            Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 10:10 +0100
              Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2025-10-30 10:10 +0100
          Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 15:30 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2025-10-27 21:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 11:20 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 19:30 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Nikos Tsipinakis" <nikos@tsipinakis.com> - 2025-10-30 14:40 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic <milan@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 22:40 +0100
    Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 23:40 +0100
      Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> - 2025-10-28 10:10 +0100
    Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau <romain@dolbeau.org> - 2025-10-28 10:00 +0100
      Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2025-11-02 23:30 +0100
      Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 00:20 +0100
  Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2025-12-05 00:20 +0100
  R: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> - 2026-09-07 09:20 +0200

csiph-web