Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.kernel > #89792
| Path | csiph.com!news.neodome.net!fu-berlin.de!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.devel.release, linux.debian.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Architecture baseline for Forky |
| Date | Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:30:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LKA8F-8qSx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <LK8cp-85Zv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-release-request@lists.debian.org Mon Oct 27 18:22:23 2025 |
| Old-Return-Path | <cjwatson@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-108.661 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, MONEY_NOHTML=0.748, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no |
| Mail-Followup-To | debian-release@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, debian-toolchain@lists.debian.org |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Debian-User | cjwatson |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-release@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/178133 |
| List-ID | <debian-release.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aP-4SgCexBKTXTo0@riva.ucam.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 32 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | debian-toolchain@lists.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:22:02 +0000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <aP-4SgCexBKTXTo0@riva.ucam.org> |
| X-Original-References | <20251026122129.qhuo7s5y6ezbmyh7@shell.thinkmo.de> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.devel.release:137396 linux.debian.kernel:89792 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
[dropping debian-ports since I saw a request for that in the thread] On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 01:21:29PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: >## amd64 (and i386) > >* x86-64-v2: Supported since around 2008[^x86]. Used in RedHat 9[^redhat9x86]. >* x86-64-v3: Supported since around 2013-2015[^x86]. Used in RedHat > 10[^redhat10]. > >I propose to use the x86-64-v2 baseline in Forky. It gives us more then the 15 >years and everyone else already switched to it or even a newer variant. >Factoring in a possible LTS for Trixie, this means that x86-64-v1 will stop >being supported by Debian in 2030. CERN spoke at DebConf [1] and indicated that ~47% of their accelerator control fleet runs x86-64-v1, which due to a cascading series of replacement costs meant that they estimated a budget of about €7M to migrate from CentOS 7 to CentOS Streams 9. As a result they chose to switch to Debian instead, and they said that their plan A was to use trixie and upgrade to forky in 2030. If I understood them correctly, they did say (in the Q&A) that there was a plan to upgrade to at least x86-64-v2 in the 2034 long shutdown, but that it was still a complex project with the possibility of being derailed by operational issues. Has anyone consulted with them about how this would affect their plans? They're a pretty significant organization and I know a lot of Debian developers would like to keep them being able to use Debian. [1] https://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2025/DebConf25/debconf25-605-approaching-the-speed-of-light-with-debian-debians-role-in-the-worlds-largest-particle-accelerator.av1.webm -- Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwatson@debian.org]
Back to linux.debian.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-26 13:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2025-10-26 14:20 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 08:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Tony Rodriguez <unixpro1970@gmail.com> - 2025-10-26 19:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> - 2025-10-26 20:30 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 12:50 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Martin <debacle@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 18:10 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2025-10-27 22:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-29 09:00 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 07:00 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Peter Green <plugwash@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 10:10 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> - 2025-10-30 10:10 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-30 15:30 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2025-10-27 21:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 11:20 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 19:30 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky "Nikos Tsipinakis" <nikos@tsipinakis.com> - 2025-10-30 14:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Milan Kupcevic <milan@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 22:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-10-27 23:40 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Marc Haber <mh+debian-release@zugschlus.de> - 2025-10-28 10:10 +0100
Planned obsolescence ? (was: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky) Romain Dolbeau <romain@dolbeau.org> - 2025-10-28 10:00 +0100
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (OpenBSD) Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> - 2025-11-02 23:30 +0100
Re: Planned obsolescence ? (*BSD, Rust) David Starner <prosfilaes@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 00:20 +0100
Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2025-12-05 00:20 +0100
R: Re: Architecture baseline for Forky Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> - 2026-09-07 09:20 +0200
csiph-web