Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > demon.ip.support.turnpike > #18570
| From | John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | demon.ip.support.turnpike |
| Subject | Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] |
| Date | 2026-04-09 09:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n3p6peF3tf5U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <102u52m$320gt$3@dont-email.me> <mbsmpfFduhqU1@mid.individual.net> <10r6igv$3skgv$2@dont-email.me> |
On 08/04/2026 22:49, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
<snip>
> On the whole, I'm gradually unlearning muscle memory for TP and learning
> it for TB; it's mostly OK, and the experience of using something still
> being supported - albeit erratically - has its attractions.
I'm in the same position, having now been using TB for about six months,
after buying a 64-bit machine when my old PC died and deciding that
running a 32-bit VM on it would be an additional complication that I
didn't want to face.
>
> The main snag at the moment is that TB doesn't carry "read" (or keep)
> status across between newsgroups for crossposted posts (it would seem to
> store multiple copies thereof); it's a snag known about, and_may_ get
> worked on.
Yes, that annoys me too.
--
John Hall
You can divide people into two categories:
those who divide people into two categories and those who don't
Back to demon.ip.support.turnpike | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-18 11:40 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] Martin Liddle <news15@tynecomp.co.uk> - 2025-06-19 12:30 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-19 17:51 +0100
Re: Ping � [tumbleweed �] John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2025-06-19 19:15 +0100
Re: Ping � [tumbleweed �] John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2025-06-19 19:23 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-19 20:14 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2025-06-20 10:27 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-20 14:21 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] brian <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> - 2025-06-20 17:29 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] Malcolm Loades <devnull@loades.net> - 2025-06-23 10:58 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-23 15:04 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-08 22:49 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-09 09:37 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-09 17:43 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-09 18:06 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-09 18:38 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-09 19:00 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 10:58 +0100
Re: Re: Ping � [tumbleweed �] Graeme <News@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 15:29 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 16:32 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] Graeme <News@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 17:12 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 18:15 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 19:25 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-10 20:25 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-10 23:15 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-11 10:31 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-11 11:35 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] Graeme <News@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2026-04-11 09:49 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-11 10:33 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-12 11:01 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-12 17:10 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] Graeme <News@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2026-04-12 18:10 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-12 18:28 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-12 19:04 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-12 22:53 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-13 10:26 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] Graeme <News@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2026-04-13 16:36 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-13 19:56 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-13 23:20 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-14 10:16 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-14 10:34 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-13 23:13 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] Graeme <News@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2026-04-13 16:30 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2026-04-13 23:07 +0100
Re: Ping [tumbleweed ] John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> - 2026-04-14 10:21 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] Laurence Taylor <laurence@nospam.plus.com> - 2025-06-23 15:19 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-23 15:30 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] Laurence Taylor <laurence@nospam.plus.com> - 2025-06-25 15:07 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2025-06-25 18:21 +0100
Re: Ping … [tumbleweed …] Laurence Taylor <laurence@nospam.plus.com> - 2025-06-26 17:16 +0100
csiph-web