Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #50890 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-10-27 09:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2014-02-09 17:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 578 — 55 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.system
Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 09:41 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 11:56 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-16 15:20 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-27 13:01 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 12:36 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 14:41 -0500
Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 19:58 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 15:05 -0500
Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 20:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-10-28 10:23 +1100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-29 10:09 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-27 19:57 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 13:20 -0700
Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-27 14:04 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 16:10 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 14:35 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 16:39 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 01:35 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-27 22:10 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 21:59 -0500
Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-27 20:37 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-27 21:16 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 17:38 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-27 21:49 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 18:59 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 00:28 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 22:03 +1300
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-28 00:49 -0400
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 19:01 +1300
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-28 02:59 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 00:50 -0700
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-28 04:16 -0400
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 22:03 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 12:36 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 17:34 +1300
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-28 00:49 -0400
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 19:04 +1300
Re: Newsreaders gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-10-27 19:18 -0700
Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-27 20:34 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 03:48 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-27 21:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 16:57 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 16:04 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-27 23:24 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 12:41 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-28 15:51 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-29 05:28 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 20:55 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 17:01 -0700
Re: Newsreaders gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-10-27 19:16 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:21 -0500
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 10:58 +1300
Re: Newsreaders M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-10-27 19:24 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-27 23:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-10-27 20:09 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 19:16 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-28 00:16 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:11 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-28 13:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 09:01 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:09 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 20:44 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-29 09:53 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:27 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 04:50 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 22:01 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 13:04 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2013-10-30 12:11 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 13:27 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 08:56 +1300
Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-11-17 19:28 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-29 09:56 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 01:26 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 21:04 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 02:11 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 22:01 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 03:40 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 17:26 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:17 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:16 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 13:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:43 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Ted Lee <tmplee@mr.net> - 2013-10-27 20:30 -0500
Re: Newsreaders AV3 <arvimide@earthlink.net> - 2013-10-28 11:02 -0400
Re: Newsreaders TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@me.com> - 2013-10-27 21:07 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-27 21:29 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 00:48 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-28 16:01 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:21 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:31 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 08:57 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-29 05:25 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:22 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 21:22 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 13:29 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 01:43 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 18:25 +1300
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 01:33 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:37 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 19:25 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 07:25 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 04:07 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 09:00 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:24 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 09:26 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 21:35 +0000
Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-29 16:28 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 13:33 +1300
Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-29 23:14 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 21:43 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 12:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-31 09:31 +1300
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 08:52 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 19:36 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 12:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 09:29 +1300
Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-10-30 16:44 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 23:22 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-31 13:15 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-28 21:37 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 14:17 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-28 22:20 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 23:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 16:27 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-28 21:25 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-28 22:41 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-29 00:36 +0000
Re: Newsreaders "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-10-29 10:10 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-29 08:36 -0500
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:25 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 05:00 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 22:01 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 13:14 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-10-30 13:42 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 14:49 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 09:15 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-10-30 22:32 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-31 07:00 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-10-31 13:56 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-31 14:24 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-10-31 19:19 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-31 21:30 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-31 17:37 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-10-31 23:00 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-10-31 18:36 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-01 01:32 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@6usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2013-11-01 10:39 -0500
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-02 10:00 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-11-02 11:02 -0400
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-31 16:23 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-31 10:41 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-31 17:09 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-31 11:02 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-31 21:34 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-31 15:13 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-01 10:52 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-31 15:14 -0700
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-01 14:08 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-01 01:33 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-01 19:26 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-31 21:32 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-10-31 19:06 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-30 07:45 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 14:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-30 13:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-30 15:05 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 09:15 +1300
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 09:15 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 13:00 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 09:15 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 23:36 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 13:18 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-31 07:09 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 20:51 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-31 09:29 +0100
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 22:07 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-10-31 12:07 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-31 11:17 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-31 11:40 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-31 16:12 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! billy@MIX.COM - 2013-10-31 16:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders =?UTF-8?Q?=21=C2=A1=21?= Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-31 16:41 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡!? Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-31 11:55 -0500
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Barry OGrady <atheist@hotmail.com.au> - 2013-11-02 13:22 +1100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-02 05:41 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-11-02 14:23 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-02 13:48 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-11-02 16:25 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-11-02 10:58 -0500
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-02 16:25 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-02 16:58 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-02 20:49 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-02 22:49 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-11-02 13:21 -0500
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-02 19:31 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 11:58 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-02 12:12 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-02 16:27 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-02 12:47 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-02 22:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-11-02 23:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-02 23:16 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-02 19:27 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-03 03:36 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-02 23:43 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-11-02 21:03 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-03 07:33 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-03 08:44 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-03 18:16 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-03 13:28 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-03 20:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-03 14:54 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-03 21:19 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-04 12:20 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-03 08:25 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-03 04:39 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-03 08:49 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:02 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Michelle Steiner <foo@bar.com> - 2013-11-03 19:13 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 03:43 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 00:53 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-03 08:14 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-08 16:28 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-09 04:13 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-10 08:28 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !�! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-11 09:02 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !�! Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-11-11 00:52 -0800
Re: Newsreaders !�! Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-11-11 00:56 -0800
Re: Re: Newsreaders !�! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-12 09:00 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !�! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-12 20:54 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !�! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-13 09:21 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !�! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-12 14:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !�! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-12 20:29 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !�! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-13 06:44 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-13 22:52 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !�! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-12 20:52 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !�! Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-11-12 14:27 -0800
Re: Newsreaders !�! Ted Lee <tmplee@mr.net> - 2013-11-12 17:04 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 05:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-13 06:45 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 10:15 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-14 10:00 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-14 12:08 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-15 07:38 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-15 11:32 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-13 22:52 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 12:41 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-14 10:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-14 10:02 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-11-17 20:00 -0500
Re: Newsreaders !?! Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-11-17 17:14 -0800
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-11 22:37 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-12 13:50 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-13 03:59 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-12 19:31 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-13 22:37 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-12 21:47 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-13 16:58 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 10:37 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-14 09:24 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-14 17:23 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-15 13:18 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-15 06:44 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-15 22:34 -0600
Re: Newsreaders - not for €, Tim’s only Martin Trautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 05:08 +0000
Re: Newsreaders - not for €, Tim’s only Doc O'Leary <droleary@6usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2013-11-16 11:07 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-17 08:26 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 19:40 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 00:15 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-17 13:36 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-13 22:52 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 12:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-14 02:59 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 21:11 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-14 11:49 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-14 02:03 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-14 17:30 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-15 05:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-15 18:23 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-15 22:36 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-15 11:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-15 17:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-15 18:03 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-15 18:23 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-15 21:18 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 04:15 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-16 04:20 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-16 13:47 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-16 00:45 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 04:19 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 04:48 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 07:55 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-16 17:51 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-11-15 12:21 -0800
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-11-15 14:32 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-16 00:47 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lloyd E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-11-15 14:30 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Ted Lee <tmplee@mr.net> - 2013-11-15 13:26 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-15 22:09 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-16 00:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-16 01:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-16 03:57 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-16 07:59 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-16 01:54 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-16 20:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-16 19:51 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-16 10:21 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-16 04:17 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-16 14:00 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 02:09 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-16 20:08 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !?! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-17 12:09 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !?! David Ritz <dritz@mindspring.com> - 2013-11-16 13:33 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !?! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 01:47 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-15 07:59 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-15 11:36 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-15 18:23 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-16 19:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 01:49 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-18 06:52 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-15 17:51 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-16 07:58 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-16 19:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-17 11:10 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-15 17:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2013-11-15 22:50 -0600
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 02:14 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-17 17:48 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 06:40 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-18 05:37 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-17 15:15 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 16:51 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-18 06:16 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-18 06:09 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 20:23 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¬°! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-18 09:27 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¬°! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-18 15:44 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¬°! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-11-17 18:02 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¬°! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-17 06:45 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 11:58 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-02 19:27 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 15:55 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-11-02 23:43 -0400
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 18:54 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-03 08:51 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-02 16:59 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-02 20:53 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !?! Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-11-02 14:02 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-02 21:11 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-02 21:32 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 11:58 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-03 00:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-03 01:55 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:07 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:23 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-03 01:07 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jim Gibson <JimSGibson@gmail.com> - 2013-11-02 18:31 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 15:55 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:10 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-11-02 19:50 -0700
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 15:55 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 16:12 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-03 03:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-03 05:28 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:13 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-03 01:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 15:55 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-11-03 03:43 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-03 05:30 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-03 18:54 +1300
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Matt <hfrarg@thelostplatypus.org.invalid> - 2013-11-03 12:48 +0100
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-11-03 16:37 -0800
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:05 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:39 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-04 02:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-11-03 01:05 +0000
Re: Newsreaders !¡! Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-11-04 01:33 +0000
Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-11-01 10:52 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-31 10:12 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> - 2013-11-13 21:15 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-11-14 10:01 +0000
Re: Newsreaders spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2013-11-05 20:31 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-08 00:49 +0200
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-07 18:42 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-08 02:05 +0000
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-08 16:12 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 15:21 -0600
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-08 20:01 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-08 18:09 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 21:48 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 20:51 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2014-02-28 12:19 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-09 01:40 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-08 21:50 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-09 19:26 +0200
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 17:31 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-09 23:22 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 23:44 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-10 02:01 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 10:00 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-11 13:27 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 09:51 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-11 18:55 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-11 23:28 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-09 19:40 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 04:34 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-08 02:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-08 03:33 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-08 06:28 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-08 14:28 +0000
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-08 16:57 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-08 12:54 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-08 19:02 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2014-02-08 19:29 +0000
Re: Newsreaders dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-02-09 12:50 +1300
Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2014-02-09 13:21 +0000
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-08 23:06 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-08 20:01 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 02:35 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-08 18:49 +0000
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-08 23:11 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-08 20:01 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-09 22:31 +0100
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-09 23:46 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 23:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-09 19:33 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-09 17:46 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 00:49 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-09 20:45 -0500
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-09 20:45 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-09 19:09 -0700
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-09 22:03 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Tom Stiller <clusterfux.upmon@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 14:04 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 16:48 +0000
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-10 15:10 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 16:44 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 13:43 -0500
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-11 00:29 +0000
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-10 20:01 -0500
Re: Newsreaders MartinC <noreply@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 20:05 +0100
Re: Newsreaders dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-02-14 12:20 +1300
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-13 18:40 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-13 23:45 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-14 17:16 +0100
Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2014-02-14 12:11 -0500
Re: Newsreaders android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-09 09:50 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Matti Haveri <nospam@here.invalid> - 2014-02-09 16:19 +0200
Re: Newsreaders android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-09 09:53 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-09 10:22 +0100
Re: Newsreaders android <here@there.was> - 2014-02-09 10:27 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 15:24 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-09 23:47 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-10 19:21 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-09 11:22 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-09 22:23 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-09 23:08 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-09 19:37 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-10 09:59 -0500
Re: Newsreaders dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-11 06:40 +1100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-10 19:01 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 19:40 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-10 23:23 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-11 19:40 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-11 22:45 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-10 22:07 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-10 23:38 -0600
Re: Newsreaders dorayme <do_ray_me@bigpond.com> - 2014-02-11 16:58 +1100
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-11 23:06 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 17:02 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-11 16:28 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-11 23:30 -0600
Re: Newsreaders me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2014-02-12 17:20 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-12 17:25 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-12 18:25 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-12 18:25 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-12 17:20 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-12 18:30 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-13 04:44 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-12 23:38 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-13 15:15 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-13 13:52 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 13:44 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 13:33 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-16 08:23 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 12:58 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-16 15:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-11 23:40 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-12 18:32 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-13 05:02 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 13:44 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 19:46 -0500
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 12:40 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-11 20:29 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-10 11:30 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-10 19:08 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-10 13:32 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-10 21:00 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-11 11:35 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-11 13:19 -0500
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-12 12:31 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 12:20 -0700
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-14 12:16 -0800
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-13 15:25 +0000
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-13 12:46 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-14 00:52 +0000
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-14 11:57 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-15 01:41 +0000
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-15 11:36 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-15 20:23 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-16 11:05 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-19 19:31 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-15 13:33 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-16 11:51 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-16 12:28 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-17 11:33 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-17 17:42 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-15 20:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-16 12:01 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-17 02:59 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-17 11:38 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-19 19:26 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2014-02-14 12:14 -0800
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2014-02-14 17:04 -0500
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-11 16:55 -0500
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-12 12:19 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-12 12:19 -0700
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-12 20:29 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-13 12:26 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-13 22:33 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 19:51 -0500
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-13 12:23 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-11 13:49 +0000
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-11 11:41 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-11 19:37 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-12 12:38 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-12 20:24 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-13 12:11 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-11 11:27 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-11 16:53 -0500
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-12 12:11 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2014-02-12 20:04 -0500
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-13 12:05 -0600
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 11:32 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-16 11:17 +0100
Re: Newsreaders + Thunderbird first impressions Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-16 12:18 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-10 12:41 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-10 19:42 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-10 21:55 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-11 11:58 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-11 19:47 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-02-12 02:05 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-12 18:31 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-12 11:39 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-12 19:02 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-13 11:31 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@googlemail.com> - 2014-02-13 19:11 +0100
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-14 00:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Doc O'Leary <droleary@8usenet2013.subsume.com> - 2014-02-14 11:32 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2014-02-14 17:54 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2014-02-11 19:10 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-02-25 09:50 +0000
Re: Newsreaders Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> - 2014-02-25 21:08 -0600
Re: Newsreaders Michael Breslau <mbreslau@speakeasy.org> - 2014-02-26 08:03 -0800
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-26 20:12 -0700
Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2014-02-09 17:41 -0700
Page 15 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 29 Next page →
| From | Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-17 00:15 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <l691r2$90e$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| In reply to | #52357 |
On 16.11.2013 20:26, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Day 19 of the Unicode thread saga - somehow, overcoming terrible > adversity, I continue to be able to communicate effectively... No. -- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-17 13:36 +1300 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <1lchf2z.1v4ggto1ckkgncN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #52374 |
Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > On 16.11.2013 20:26, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > > Day 19 of the Unicode thread saga - somehow, overcoming terrible > > adversity, I continue to be able to communicate effectively... > No. And yet you're able to reply with an absolutely worthless reponse. Amazing :-D Somehow, remarkably, the essence of what I said filtered through to you. Truly amazing. -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-13 22:52 +1300 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <1lcaps6.16uj8x41mwwm1sN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #52191 |
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > In article <timmcn-BF648C.21474412112013@news.iphouse.com>, Tim > McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: > > In article <l5q2ve$urb$1@tota-refugium.de>, > > Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > > > On 08.11.2013 23:28, Tim McNamara wrote: > > > > In article <slrnl7b0ll.13j.mr@irc.sandman.net>, > > > > Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Having a GUI doesn't make an app more "Mac" than another. > > > > > > > > You don't know much about this history of the Mac if you think that is > > > > the case. > > > > > > > Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode support > > > since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't cope with it in2013? > > > > > > ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??ƒ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. > > > > Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with Unicode, > > isn't it? > > Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either. :-) 95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall _anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently decided this is his. Lucky us... :-D Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or an older almost universally supported encoding. -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-13 12:48 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <l5voun$bq7$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| In reply to | #52207 |
On 13.11.2013 10:52, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > >> In article <timmcn-BF648C.21474412112013@news.iphouse.com>, Tim >> McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: >>> In article <l5q2ve$urb$1@tota-refugium.de>, >>> Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: >>>> On 08.11.2013 23:28, Tim McNamara wrote: >>>>> In article <slrnl7b0ll.13j.mr@irc.sandman.net>, >>>>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Having a GUI doesn't make an app more "Mac" than another. >>>>> >>>>> You don't know much about this history of the Mac if you think that is >>>>> the case. >>>>> >>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode support >>>> since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't cope with it in2013? >>>> >>>> ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??ƒ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. >>> >>> Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with Unicode, >>> isn't it? >> >> Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either. :-) > > 95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall > _anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but > never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the > fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently > decided this is his. Lucky us... :-D > > Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine > using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or > an older almost universally supported encoding. > There is a life outside the the latin countries. What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? Just for your reality check: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. So much to your perception of 95% being low... But keep insulting people... -- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-14 02:59 +1300 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <1lcb0tz.ocwxga13du1o2N%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #52209 |
Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > On 13.11.2013 10:52, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > > > >> In article <timmcn-BF648C.21474412112013@news.iphouse.com>, Tim > >> McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: > >>> In article <l5q2ve$urb$1@tota-refugium.de>, > >>> Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 08.11.2013 23:28, Tim McNamara wrote: > >>>>> In article <slrnl7b0ll.13j.mr@irc.sandman.net>, > >>>>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Having a GUI doesn't make an app more "Mac" than another. > >>>>> > >>>>> You don't know much about this history of the Mac if you think that is > >>>>> the case. > >>>>> > >>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode support > >>>> since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't cope with it in2013? > >>>> > >>>> ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??ƒ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. > >>> > >>> Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with Unicode, > >>> isn't it? > >> > >> Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either. :-) > > > > 95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall > > _anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but > > never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the > > fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently > > decided this is his. Lucky us... :-D > > > > Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine > > using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or > > an older almost universally supported encoding. > > > There is a life outside the the latin countries. > What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? > Just for your reality check: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png > And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the > world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. > So much to your perception of 95% being low... > But keep insulting people... Wow, you're right. You win, because encodings for other languages never existed before Unicode and have not been well supported for decades, and that wasn't pointed out to you mere days ago by myself when you tried the same moronic twisting/denial of reality. Nor does the wording of "or an older almost universally supported encoding" include anything but western latin encodings. In fact it magically excludes everything else. Because it's special English that magically has hidden meanings only you know. Magic! Weee! You're either very, _very_ ignorant and uneducated, extremely stupid, a troll, or more likely a combination of all of the above. Hint: when you're going to twist/deny reality, you probably don't want to repeat the same moronic crap right below where you were soundly refuted earlier on, over exactly the same moronic failure to score exactly the same point. It makes you look even more stupid. Were that possible... The entire world is that little bit more stupid today, thanks to you. Do you have _anything_ positive to contribute to society? -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-13 21:11 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <l60mct$jm0$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| In reply to | #52210 |
On 13.11.2013 14:59, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >>>>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode support >>>>>> > >>>>since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't cope with it in2013? >>>>>> > >>>> >>>>>> > >>>>ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??ƒ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. >>>>> > >>> >>>>> > >>>Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with Unicode, >>>>> > >>>isn't it? >>>> > >> >>>> > >>Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either.:-) >>> > > >>> > >95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall >>> > >_anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but >>> > >never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the >>> > >fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently >>> > >decided this is his. Lucky us...:-D >>> > > >>> > >Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine >>> > >using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or >>> > >an older almost universally supported encoding. >>> > > >> >There is a life outside the the latin countries. >> >What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? >> >Just for your reality check: >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png >> >And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the >> >world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. >> >So much to your perception of 95% being low... >> >But keep insulting people... > Wow, you're right. You win, because encodings for other languages never > existed before Unicode and have not been well supported for decades, ... You just have got stuck ten years behind, national encodings are out since ages. And you'd better stop being insulting; that does not throw a positive light on you. -- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-14 11:49 +1300 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <1lcbp7s.1c3mfdwetftkiN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #52212 |
Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > On 13.11.2013 14:59, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > >>>>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode > >>>>>> support > >>>>since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't > >>>>>> cope with it in2013? > >>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??ƒ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. > >>>>> > >>> > >>>>> > >>>Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with > >>>>> > >>>Unicode, isn't it? > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >>Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either.:-) > >>> > > > >>> > >95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall > >>> > >_anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but > >>> > >never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the > >>> > >fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently > >>> > >decided this is his. Lucky us...:-D > >>> > > > >>> > >Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine > >>> > >using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or > >>> > >an older almost universally supported encoding. > >>> > > > >> >There is a life outside the the latin countries. > >> >What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? > >> >Just for your reality check: > >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png > >> >And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the > >> >world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. > >> >So much to your perception of 95% being low... > >> >But keep insulting people... > > Wow, you're right. You win, because encodings for other languages never > > existed before Unicode and have not been well supported for decades, ... > > You just have got stuck ten years behind, national encodings are out > since ages. > And you'd better stop being insulting; that does not throw a positive > light on you. Yes, you're quite right. I need to move with the times, and in your deranged head that time is full unicode compliance. Cheers for sorting that out for me. I thought I had software that worked fine for every single post I've ever wanted to read and write and have read by others for the past 15 years (has it been that long since I got my own place, bought my first Mac, my very own internet connection, and MacSOUP to access Usenet on it?), but you have shown me the error of my ways. It's not enough that everything important works fine. No, I've been deluding myself. Life will only be right and on the true path if I get a fully unicode compliant usenet client to your satisfaction. What a fool I've been. And selfish too! I hadn't considered the harm I'd been doing to worthless mentally ill fuckheads like you. I promise - I'll do better. Please, I can meet your standards. I just know I can. My self worth is now properly focused on pleasing you. Yeah, it looks like I wasn't done being "insulting" after all. Oh well, another goal to work towards on the Laszlo path to happiness... Also I completely failed to notice how twice now you've avoided dealing with the consequences of your earlier fuckup when you tried to come off all smug, only to pratfall yet again. Don't worry - it flew totally under the radar, as I obsessed about how my using MacSOUP is causing you irreparable injury, and ignored everything else as a consequence. Whew! -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-14 02:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <l617hc$jum$1@tota-refugium.de> |
| In reply to | #52216 |
On 13.11.2013 23:49, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > >> On 13.11.2013 14:59, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >>>>>>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode >>>>>>>> support > >>>>since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't >>>>>>>> cope with it in2013? > >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??ƒ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with >>>>>>>>>>> Unicode, isn't it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either.:-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall >>>>>>> _anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but >>>>>>> never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the >>>>>>> fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently >>>>>>> decided this is his. Lucky us...:-D >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine >>>>>>> using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or >>>>>>> an older almost universally supported encoding. >>>>>>> >>>>> There is a life outside the the latin countries. >>>>> What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? >>>>> Just for your reality check: >>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png >>>>> And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the >>>>> world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. >>>>> So much to your perception of 95% being low... >>>>> But keep insulting people... >>> Wow, you're right. You win, because encodings for other languages never >>> existed before Unicode and have not been well supported for decades, ... >> >> You just have got stuck ten years behind, national encodings are out >> since ages. >> And you'd better stop being insulting; that does not throw a positive >> light on you. > > Yes, you're quite right. I need to move with the times, and in your > deranged head that time is full unicode compliance. Cheers for sorting > that out for me. I thought I had software that worked fine for every > single post I've ever wanted to read and write and have read by others > for the past 15 years (has it been that long since I got my own place, > bought my first Mac, my very own internet connection, and MacSOUP to > access Usenet on it?), but you have shown me the error of my ways. It's > not enough that everything important works fine. No, I've been deluding > myself. Life will only be right and on the true path if I get a fully > unicode compliant usenet client to your satisfaction. What a fool I've > been. And selfish too! I hadn't considered the harm I'd been doing to > worthless mentally ill fuckheads like you. I promise - I'll do better. > Please, I can meet your standards. I just know I can. My self worth is > now properly focused on pleasing you. > > Yeah, it looks like I wasn't done being "insulting" after all. Oh well, > another goal to work towards on the Laszlo path to happiness... > > Also I completely failed to notice how twice now you've avoided dealing > with the consequences of your earlier fuckup when you tried to come off > all smug, only to pratfall yet again. Don't worry - it flew totally > under the radar, as I obsessed about how my using MacSOUP is causing you > irreparable injury, and ignored everything else as a consequence. Whew! > So live well, being ridiculous won't kill you. EOD. -- One computer and three operating systems, not the other way round. One wife and many hotels, not the other way round ! ;-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-14 17:30 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <timmcn-5D75A4.17304014112013@news.iphouse.com> |
| In reply to | #52209 |
In article <l5voun$bq7$1@tota-refugium.de>, Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > On 13.11.2013 10:52, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: > > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: > > > >> In article <timmcn-BF648C.21474412112013@news.iphouse.com>, Tim > >> McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: > >>> In article <l5q2ve$urb$1@tota-refugium.de>, > >>> Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: > >>>> On 08.11.2013 23:28, Tim McNamara wrote: > >>>>> In article <slrnl7b0ll.13j.mr@irc.sandman.net>, > >>>>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Having a GUI doesn't make an app more "Mac" than another. > >>>>> > >>>>> You don't know much about this history of the Mac if you think that is > >>>>> the case. > >>>>> > >>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode support > >>>> since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't cope with it in2013? > >>>> > >>>> ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ??Ÿ??à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. > >>> > >>> Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with Unicode, > >>> isn't it? > >> > >> Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either. :-) > > > > 95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall > > _anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but > > never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the > > fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently > > decided this is his. Lucky us... :-D > > > > Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine > > using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or > > an older almost universally supported encoding. > > > There is a life outside the the latin countries. > What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? > Just for your reality check: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png > And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the > world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. > So much to your perception of 95% being low... > But keep insulting people... You remain obtuse, L. SInce I can't read or write Spanish, it does not matter if my newsreader can print those glyphs to my screen. I wouldn't understand them. I will not be reading and writing Usenet posts in Spanish or any other language rendered through Unicode. If someone is insulted that I don't speak Spanish, well, I can only feel sorry for them. Sort of like how I felt when I saw an ugly American couple berating Parisian shop workers for not speaking English and knowing the price of everything in US dollars (on a day when 1 Euro = USD $0.99)... Stop being so small minded and get on with your life. So my newsreader doesn't do Unicode. WTF difference does that make to your life? If the answer is >0, you need a new life. -- And wackiness ensues...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 05:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <slrnl8bar7.np4.g.kreme@mbp55.local> |
| In reply to | #52253 |
In message <timmcn-5D75A4.17304014112013@news.iphouse.com> Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: > In article <l5voun$bq7$1@tota-refugium.de>, > Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: >> On 13.11.2013 10:52, Jamie Kahn Genet wrote: >> > Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >> > >> >> In article <timmcn-BF648C.21474412112013@news.iphouse.com>, Tim >> >> McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote: >> >>> In article <l5q2ve$urb$1@tota-refugium.de>, >> >>> Laszlo Lebrun <lazlo_lebrun@laszlomail.com> wrote: >> >>>> On 08.11.2013 23:28, Tim McNamara wrote: >> >>>>> In article <slrnl7b0ll.13j.mr@irc.sandman.net>, >> >>>>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Having a GUI doesn't make an app more "Mac" than another. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> You don't know much about this history of the Mac if you think that is >> >>>>> the case. >> >>>>> >> >>>> Just to mention Mac's history: Macintoshs have included Unicode support >> >>>> since version 8.5 and your newsreader still can't cope with it in2013? >> >>>> >> >>>> ì?'? à ?ì?? ??à? ???? ????à?? çà?'? ?ì???à? ??à?. >> >>> >> >>> Lucky for me that I don't care if my newsreader can cope with Unicode, >> >>> isn't it? >> >> >> >> Probably 95% of people on Usenet don't care about it either. :-) >> > >> > 95% seems low to me. This is the first time in two decades I can recall >> > _anyone_ getting this upset over Unicode and Usenet. It's come up, but >> > never been more than minor concern that I can recall. Laszlo being the >> > fanatical sort who needs an imagined cause célèbre, has apparently >> > decided this is his. Lucky us... :-D >> > >> > Meanwhile back in reality virtually everyone here gets by just fine >> > using the first backward compatible 128 ASCII characters in Unicode, or >> > an older almost universally supported encoding. >> > >> There is a life outside the the latin countries. >> What you didn't experience yourself, apparently, did you? >> Just for your reality check: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WritingSystemsoftheWorld4.png >> And even in the latin countries, the third most spoken languange in the >> world, spanish uses glyphs that your client can't resolve. >> So much to your perception of 95% being low... >> But keep insulting people... > You remain obtuse, L. SInce I can't read or write Spanish, it does not > matter if my newsreader can print those glyphs to my screen. I wouldn't > understand them. I will not be reading and writing Usenet posts in > Spanish or any other language rendered through Unicode. There are many uses for unicode other than foreign language characters, of course. "Press ⌘R" "Never lead with A♧ before Q♤ has been played." "Hold the eject key (⏏)" "Force quit… ⌥⌘⎋" ★ list item ★ another list item ★ yet another list item Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. > Stop being so small minded Yes, it is everyone else whose mind is small. Of course it is. -- The reason that we don't have "bear-proof" garbage cans in the park is that there is a significant overlap in intelligence between the smartest bears and the dumbest humans.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 18:23 +1300 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <1lce2qs.ifq54t210r9dN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> |
| In reply to | #52264 |
Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > There are many uses for unicode other than foreign language characters, of > course. Maybe I'll see one I care about in the next decade... meanwhile I seem to have no trouble reading and writing posts that are not deliberately including characters not fully supported by clients like MacSOUP. And the only ones that have deliberately included such characters in such a way as to make it impossible for me to understand them, have been... wait for it... posts complaining about lack of full unicode implementation. When threads about something important start requiring me to use a fully unicode compliant client, I'll act. Two decades in Usenet and that's yet to occur. So you'll understand if I don't hold my breath... -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim McNamara <timmcn@bitstream.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 22:36 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <timmcn-A5504E.22364315112013@news.iphouse.com> |
| In reply to | #52266 |
In article <1lce2qs.ifq54t210r9dN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz>, jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote: > Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > > > There are many uses for unicode other than foreign language > > characters, of course. > > Maybe I'll see one I care about in the next decade... meanwhile I > seem to have no trouble reading and writing posts that are not > deliberately including characters not fully supported by clients like > MacSOUP. And the only ones that have deliberately included such > characters in such a way as to make it impossible for me to > understand them, have been... wait for it... posts complaining about > lack of full unicode implementation. LOL! And exactly the same for me. > When threads about something important start requiring me to use a > fully unicode compliant client, I'll act. Two decades in Usenet and > that's yet to occur. So you'll understand if I don't hold my > breath... -- And wackiness ensues...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 11:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <slrnl8c218.hnm.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| In reply to | #52264 |
In article <slrnl8bar7.np4.g.kreme@mbp55.local>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > There are many uses for unicode other than foreign language characters, of course. > > "Press ⌘R" > > "Never lead with A♧ before Q♤ has been played." > > "Hold the eject key (⏏)" > > "Force quit… ⌥⌘⎋" > > ★ list item > ★ another list item > ★ yet another list item > > Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, > and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. This is pretty funny. Emoji (being part of Unicode) displays just fine in slrn (allthough I'm not sure pico supports them in this followup) but they won't show in Thunderbird since Thunderbird doesn't support the full Unicode character set. Great display. -- Sandman[.net]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 17:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <slrnl8cnu3.u6s.g.kreme@mbp55.local> |
| In reply to | #52279 |
In message <slrnl8c218.hnm.mr@irc.sandman.net> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <slrnl8bar7.np4.g.kreme@mbp55.local>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: >> There are many uses for unicode other than foreign language characters, of course. >> >> "Press ⌘R" >> >> "Never lead with A♧ before Q♤ has been played." >> >> "Hold the eject key (⏏)" >> >> "Force quit… ⌥⌘⎋" >> >> ★ list item >> ★ another list item >> ★ yet another list item >> >> Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, >> and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. > This is pretty funny. Emoji (being part of Unicode) displays just fine in > slrn (allthough I'm not sure pico supports them in this followup) but they > won't show in Thunderbird since Thunderbird doesn't support the full > Unicode character set. I doubt TB will show the ⌘ ⏏ ⎋ ⌥ or ★ either. It might do the fractions? But yeah, I suspect most of those will be garbage in ThunderBird. -- It was easy to be a vegetarian by day. It was preventing yourself from becoming a humanitarian at night that took the real effort.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 18:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <slrnl8cofm.u0d.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de> |
| In reply to | #52293 |
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:54:11 +0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote: > >> "Force quit… ⌥⌘⎋" > >> > >> ★ list item > >> ★ another list item > >> ★ yet another list item > >> > >> Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, > >> and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. > > > This is pretty funny. Emoji (being part of Unicode) displays just fine in > > slrn (allthough I'm not sure pico supports them in this followup) but they > > won't show in Thunderbird since Thunderbird doesn't support the full > > Unicode character set. > > I doubt TB will show the ⌘ ⏏ ⎋ ⌥ or ★ either. It might do the fractions? > But yeah, I suspect most of those will be garbage in ThunderBird. TB did not work for 🚻 🚾)🐓., but everything else looks ok to me: <http://666kb.com/i/cja4j2e2cogl28qh0.gif> - Martin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 18:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <ben74hFe561U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #52293 |
On 2013-11-15, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > In message <slrnl8c218.hnm.mr@irc.sandman.net> > Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> In article <slrnl8bar7.np4.g.kreme@mbp55.local>, Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote: > >>> There are many uses for unicode other than foreign language characters, of course. >>> >>> "Press ⌘R" >>> >>> "Never lead with A♧ before Q♤ has been played." >>> >>> "Hold the eject key (⏏)" >>> >>> "Force quit… ⌥⌘⎋" >>> >>> ★ list item >>> ★ another list item >>> ★ yet another list item >>> >>> Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, >>> and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. > >> This is pretty funny. Emoji (being part of Unicode) displays just fine in >> slrn (allthough I'm not sure pico supports them in this followup) but they >> won't show in Thunderbird since Thunderbird doesn't support the full >> Unicode character set. > > I doubt TB will show the ⌘ ⏏ ⎋ ⌥ or ★ either. It might do the fractions? > But yeah, I suspect most of those will be garbage in ThunderBird. All appear correctly in slrn. Yey! : ) -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 18:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <slrnl8cq9e.u0d.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de> |
| In reply to | #52298 |
On 15 Nov 2013 18:23:13 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > >>> Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, > >>> and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. > > All appear correctly in slrn. Yey! : ) How do those above appear in your slrn? I do not see the restroom http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f6bb/index.htm nor water closet http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f6be/index.htm or rooster http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f413/index.htm within my slrn. - Martin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-15 21:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <benhdoFfkm9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #52299 |
On 2013-11-15, Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote: > On 15 Nov 2013 18:23:13 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: >> >>> Then there are other useful symbols like ½, ±, ∩, ∆, ∇, ∫, ≄, ®, √, ∛, >> >>> and of course 🚻 (or 🚾), ‽, and 🐓. >> >> All appear correctly in slrn. Yey! : ) > > How do those above appear in your slrn? I do not see the restroom > http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f6bb/index.htm > nor water closet > http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f6be/index.htm > or rooster > http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1f413/index.htm > within my slrn. Looks like this for me: <http://jollyroger.kicks-ass.org/slrn/unicode.png> -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-16 04:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <slrnl8dsbt.u0d.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de> |
| In reply to | #52307 |
On 15 Nov 2013 21:18:48 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: > Looks like this for me: > > <http://jollyroger.kicks-ass.org/slrn/unicode.png> Oh, great, which font do you use? Mine is Menlo Regular 11pt. But I'm still stuck with MacOS 10.6 - maybe 10.9 has an even wider range of pictograms within their fonts. - Martin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-11-16 04:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Newsreaders !?! |
| Message-ID | <beoa3kFkr61U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #52326 |
On 2013-11-16, Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote: > On 15 Nov 2013 21:18:48 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: >> Looks like this for me: >> >> <http://jollyroger.kicks-ass.org/slrn/unicode.png> > > Oh, great, which font do you use? Mine is Menlo Regular 11pt. But I'm > still stuck with MacOS 10.6 - maybe 10.9 has an even wider range of > pictograms within their fonts. I'm using Source Code Pro at the moment: <http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/2012/09/source-code-pro.html> -- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter. I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead. JR
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 29 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 29 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.system
csiph-web