Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #28444
| From | Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.apps |
| Subject | Re: Aperture ? |
| Date | 2015-03-27 14:15 +0000 |
| Organization | People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates |
| Message-ID | <cnl709F9q9rU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <af6100e5-00a3-4aa4-80be-eaa701a8177b@googlegroups.com> <260320152024285191%star@sky.net> <2015032619001741778-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> <cnk326F13hoU1@mid.individual.net> <2015032621243778938-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> |
On 2015-03-27, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2015-03-27 04:02:14 +0000, Jolly Roger said:
>
>> On 2015-03-27, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>> On 2015-03-27 00:24:28 +0000, Davoud said:
>>>
>>>> <rcp27g@gmail.com>
>>>>> I personally am very wary of the moves Adobe is making to essentially make
>>>>> its creative suite software into software you rent rather than buy.
>>>>
>>>> What does that mean? Adobe CC is the gold standard for still and motion
>>>> photography, DTP, and media management. Nothing else comes close. And
>>>> you're wary of that? Doesn't "wary" mean "I'm unwilling to pay for it?"
>>>
>>> David, there is a fear that somehow Adobe is going to take advantage of
>>> them, and hold them to ransom.
>>
>> Nobody has said anything about holding anyone ransom as far as I can
>> tell. A lot of people dislike the idea of renting software
>
> That is OK.
I'm so glad you approve. If you didn't approve, I wouldn't know what to
do! </sarcasm>
>> and would prefer their software work without continuous payments
>
> That is either monthly, or one annual payment.
Every month / year, or it stops working. You think I don't fully
understand this?
>> and network connections to Adobe servers.
>
> For some of the features, such as the 20GB CC storgage, Behance web
> page service, and Lightroom Mobile syncing that is true. However that
> can be done selectively and a constant connection isn't required.
Not constant, but continuous. If you don't connect to Adobe for a year,
your software will stop working.
>> It's as simple as that. You don't have to agree with them; but you also
>> shouldn't belittle them for it. To each,
>> their own.
>
> That sentiment cuts both ways, so I have absolutely no objection to you
> selecting to use whatever image editing/asset management software
> strikes your fancy. I will continue to use my Lightroom + Photoshop
> workflow.
It may come as a shock to you, but when I state I dislike something,
it's not about you.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.
JR
Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Aperture ? Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2015-03-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-25 12:30 -0400
Re: Aperture ? bob <rcp27g@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 21:02 +0100
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-25 16:07 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-03-25 20:22 +0000
Re: Aperture ? tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-27 01:58 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 19:17 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Me, myself and I <baiheli.pip.li@xs4all.nl> - 2015-03-27 08:27 +0100
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-27 01:25 -0700
Re: Aperture ? tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.org> - 2015-03-27 07:34 -0700
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.com> - 2015-03-28 05:14 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 14:25 +0000
Re: Aperture ? tmo1138 <tmo1138@tmo1138.org> - 2015-03-30 12:33 -0700
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2015-03-29 20:46 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 18:53 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2015-04-01 10:31 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-25 22:31 +0000
Re: Aperture ? rcp27g@gmail.com - 2015-03-26 03:11 -0700
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:02 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 15:29 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 11:57 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 16:02 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 12:23 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 16:39 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 13:32 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 08:28 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 15:57 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 12:00 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 16:38 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 10:04 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 17:33 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 13:51 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 14:02 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 11:02 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 18:44 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 14:11 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-26 13:32 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 19:37 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-28 14:24 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-26 16:50 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-03-26 17:02 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-03-27 00:05 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-03-26 20:24 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 19:00 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-03-26 22:34 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-27 04:02 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-26 21:24 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-27 14:15 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Me, myself and I <baiheli.pip.li@xs4all.nl> - 2015-03-27 08:24 +0100
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:10 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2015-03-25 21:41 +0000
Re: Aperture ? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-25 17:53 -0400
Re: Aperture ? Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2015-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Aperture ? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2015-03-25 18:37 -0400
Re: Aperture ? dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2015-03-26 12:28 +1300
Re: Aperture ? Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-03-25 09:35 -0700
Re: Aperture ? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-03-25 10:47 -0700
csiph-web