Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.advocacy > #136814 > unrolled thread

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-26 00:56 +0000
    Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 10:50 -0400
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-27 00:24 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-27 01:11 +0000
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> - 2025-08-27 01:38 +0000
            Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:21 +0000
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:23 +0000
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 11:03 -0400
            Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 15:16 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:24 +0000
    Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:47 +0000

#136814 — Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me: 

> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>
>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>> fair enough. 
>>>
>>>The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>
>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>
>>>From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire thread 
>>>with all in context.
>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>
>>>Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com> 
>>><67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> 
>>><XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> 
>>><67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>
>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>><<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okO
>>iQG9qAAAJ> 
>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was posted
>> here.
>> ---
>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>> displayed:
>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record
>> of
>> the case.
>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>> background search of official public records.
>> ---
>>
>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost a
>> word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>
>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info about
>> him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted himself.
>>
>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it appears
>> you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>
>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.  Neither
>> side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12 would acquit
>> Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but personal attacks on
>> him and questionable documentation of information which, frankly, has
>> nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>
>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true of
>> Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and lacking
>> anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on an accused
>> troll. 
> 
> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
> could easily be snit.
> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
> appeared all over the place. 
> 
> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was like
> a troll farm in real life.
> 
> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or one
> of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
> 
> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to leave
> CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux groups.
> 
> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit and
> see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a pariah
> that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
> Let's see if you have the nerve.

I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20 years 
ago and I remember snit quite well.
He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named sandman 
(I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a troll.
Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet about snit is 
probably mostly true.
Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs because 
he is highly toxic.
There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many in 
the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit used 
many sock puppets back then.
It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable 
individual.
Do your own research. 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#136832

On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:

>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me: 
>
>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>> fair enough. 
>>>>
>>>>The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>
>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>
>>>>From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire thread 
>>>>with all in context.
>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>
>>>>Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com> 
>>>><67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> 
>>>><XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> 
>>>><67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>
>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>><<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okO
>>>iQG9qAAAJ> 
>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was posted
>>> here.
>>> ---
>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>> displayed:
>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record
>>> of
>>> the case.
>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>>> background search of official public records.
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost a
>>> word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>
>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info about
>>> him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted himself.
>>>
>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it appears
>>> you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>
>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.  Neither
>>> side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12 would acquit
>>> Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but personal attacks on
>>> him and questionable documentation of information which, frankly, has
>>> nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>
>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true of
>>> Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and lacking
>>> anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on an accused
>>> troll. 
>> 
>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>> could easily be snit.
>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>> appeared all over the place. 
>> 
>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was like
>> a troll farm in real life.
>> 
>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or one
>> of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>> 
>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to leave
>> CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux groups.
>> 
>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit and
>> see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a pariah
>> that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>
>I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20 years 
>ago and I remember snit quite well.
>He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named sandman 
>(I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a troll.
>Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet about snit is 
>probably mostly true.
>Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs because 
>he is highly toxic.
>There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many in 
>the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit used 
>many sock puppets back then.
>It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable 
>individual.
>Do your own research. 

So he's a troll.

SO

FUCKING

WHAT?

He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
this upset and obsessed with him.

There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.

Ignore it completely.

*plonk*
-- 
I do not think that horse is completely dead yet. 
Whip it some more. -   Siri Cruz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136857

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com: 

> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
> 
>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me: 
>>
>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>> fair enough. 
>>>>>
>>>>>The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>
>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>
>>>>>From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire
>>>>>thread with all in context.
>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>
>>>>>Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com> 
>>>>><67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> 
>>>>><XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> 
>>>>><67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>
>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>><<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/o
>>>>kO iQG9qAAAJ> 
>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>> posted here.
>>>> ---
>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>> displayed:
>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>> record of
>>>> the case.
>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a
>>>> thorough background search of official public records.
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>> himself. 
>>>>
>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>
>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG. 
>>>> Neither side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12
>>>> would acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but
>>>> personal attacks on him and questionable documentation of
>>>> information which, frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>
>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>> an accused troll. 
>>> 
>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>> could easily be snit.
>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>> appeared all over the place. 
>>> 
>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>> 
>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>> 
>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to
>>> leave CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux
>>> groups. 
>>> 
>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>
>>I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>about snit is probably mostly true.
>>Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>>Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs
>>because he is highly toxic.
>>There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>used many sock puppets back then.
>>It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable 
>>individual.
>>Do your own research. 
> 
> So he's a troll.
> 
> SO
> 
> FUCKING
> 
> WHAT?
> 
> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
> this upset and obsessed with him.
> 
> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
> 
> Ignore it completely.
> 
> *plonk*

While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a typical 
troll.
He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their employer 
and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or 
blaming others for what he himself has done.

I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this but 
I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long time 
incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit sock. 
It was Steve Caroll.
All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save yourself 
a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about snit.
I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the 
hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit sock.
Cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136859

On 2025-08-27, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com: 
>
>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me: 
>>>
>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>> fair enough. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>>Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>>Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire
>>>>>>thread with all in context.
>>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com> 
>>>>>><67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> 
>>>>>><XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> 
>>>>>><67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>>
>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>><<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/o
>>>>>kO iQG9qAAAJ> 
>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>> posted here.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>> displayed:
>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>> record of
>>>>> the case.
>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a
>>>>> thorough background search of official public records.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>> himself. 
>>>>>
>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG. 
>>>>> Neither side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12
>>>>> would acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but
>>>>> personal attacks on him and questionable documentation of
>>>>> information which, frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>> an accused troll. 
>>>> 
>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>> appeared all over the place. 
>>>> 
>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>> 
>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>> 
>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>>>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>>>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to
>>>> leave CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux
>>>> groups. 
>>>> 
>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>>
>>>I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>>years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>>He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>>sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>>troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>>about snit is probably mostly true.
>>>Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>>>Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs
>>>because he is highly toxic.
>>>There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>>in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>>used many sock puppets back then.
>>>It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable 
>>>individual.
>>>Do your own research. 
>> 
>> So he's a troll.
>> 
>> SO
>> 
>> FUCKING
>> 
>> WHAT?
>> 
>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>> 
>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>> 
>> Ignore it completely.
>> 
>> *plonk*
>
> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a typical 
> troll.
> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their employer 
> and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or 
> blaming others for what he himself has done.
>
> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this but 
> I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long time 
> incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit sock. 
> It was Steve Caroll.
> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save yourself 
> a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about snit.
> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the 
> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit sock.
> Cheers
>

Steve Carroll is not a snit sock.
the rest of what you posted is true,.
Snit made all kinds of sexual advances towards Elizabot who at the time
was vulnerable as she, as a teen, was having teen issues.
Slimeball snit tried to take advantage of that situation as kind of
a teacher---student situation.
It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. My advice is to not
waste your time as pretty much everyone knows what a sleaze snit is so proof is
no longer necessary.
BTW I remember you.



-- 
pothead

"Our lives are fashioned by our choices. First we make our choices.
 Then our choices make us."
-- Anne Frank

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136865

On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:11:18 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:

> On 2025-08-27, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>>news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>>> fair enough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>>>Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his
>>>>>>>criminal record. THE entire thread with all in context.
>>>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>>Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>>References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>>>>><67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>><XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>><67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>>Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>>><<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/
o
>>>>>>kO iQG9qAAAJ>
>>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>>> posted here.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>>> displayed:
>>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>>> record of the case.
>>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>>>>>> background search of official public records.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>>> himself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG. Neither
>>>>>> side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12 would
>>>>>> acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but personal
>>>>>> attacks on him and questionable documentation of information which,
>>>>>> frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>>> an accused troll.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>>> appeared all over the place.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>>> 
>>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other up
>>>>> until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were left
>>>>> because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to leave
>>>>> CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux groups.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>>>
>>>>I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>>>years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>>>He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>>>sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>>>troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>>>about snit is probably mostly true.
>>>>Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true. Unless
>>>>he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs because he is
>>>>highly toxic.
>>>>There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>>>in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>>>used many sock puppets back then.
>>>>It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
>>>>individual.
>>>>Do your own research.
>>> 
>>> So he's a troll.
>>> 
>>> SO
>>> 
>>> FUCKING
>>> 
>>> WHAT?
>>> 
>>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>>> 
>>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>>> 
>>> Ignore it completely.
>>> 
>>> *plonk*
>>
>> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a
>> typical troll.
>> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their
>> employer and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
>> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or
>> blaming others for what he himself has done.
>>
>> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this
>> but I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long
>> time incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
>> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit
>> sock. It was Steve Caroll.
>> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save
>> yourself a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about
>> snit.
>> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the
>> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit
>> sock.
>> Cheers
>>
>>
> Steve Carroll is not a snit sock.

That is a fact.
SC is not a snit sock although snit has posted as many socks.

> The rest of what you posted is true,.
> Snit made all kinds of sexual advances towards Elizabot who at the time
> was vulnerable as she, as a teen, was having teen issues.

While I was not around at that time, I did look in the archives and 
apparently snit had some kind of crush on this Elizabot and it got out of 
control.
I really don't know and don't care about the details.

> Slimeball snit tried to take advantage of that situation as kind of a
> teacher---student situation.

Yuck.


> It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. My advice is
> to not waste your time as pretty much everyone knows what a sleaze snit
> is so proof is no longer necessary.
> BTW I remember you.


Snit landed in several gun groups which is where I first encountered him.
He managed to piss off the regulars and after a couple of weeks of snit 
trying to set up his trolling he was politely asked to leave, which to his 
credit he did.
After he was gone, some people posted older messages that involved snit 
and the general consensus was that snit had serious mental issues and the 
regulars, including me, were just happy he had the good sense to leave.
Sadly snit has found other fertile ground for his trolling.
My advice is to never reply to snit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136872

On Aug 26, 2025 at 6:38:33 PM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<68ae6199$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:11:18 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-08-27, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com:
>>> 
>>>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>>>> fair enough.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his
>>>>>>>> criminal record. THE entire thread with all in context.
>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>>> References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>>>>>> <67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>>> <XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>>> <67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>>> Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>>>> <<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/> o
>>>>>>> kO iQG9qAAAJ>
>>>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>>>> posted here.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>>>> displayed:
>>>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>>>> record of the case.
>>>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>>>>>>> background search of official public records.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>>>> himself.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG. Neither
>>>>>>> side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12 would
>>>>>>> acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but personal
>>>>>>> attacks on him and questionable documentation of information which,
>>>>>>> frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>>>> an accused troll.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>>>> appeared all over the place.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other up
>>>>>> until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were left
>>>>>> because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to leave
>>>>>> CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux groups.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>>>> years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>>>> He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>>>> sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>>>> troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>>>> about snit is probably mostly true.
>>>>> Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true. Unless
>>>>> he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs because he is
>>>>> highly toxic.
>>>>> There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>>>> in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>>>> used many sock puppets back then.
>>>>> It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
>>>>> individual.
>>>>> Do your own research.
>>>> 
>>>> So he's a troll.
>>>> 
>>>> SO
>>>> 
>>>> FUCKING
>>>> 
>>>> WHAT?
>>>> 
>>>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>>>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>>>> 
>>>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>>>> 
>>>> Ignore it completely.
>>>> 
>>>> *plonk*
>>> 
>>> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a
>>> typical troll.
>>> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their
>>> employer and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
>>> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or
>>> blaming others for what he himself has done.
>>> 
>>> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this
>>> but I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long
>>> time incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
>>> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit
>>> sock. It was Steve Caroll.
>>> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save
>>> yourself a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about
>>> snit.
>>> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the
>>> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit
>>> sock.
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> 
>> Steve Carroll is not a snit sock.
> 
> That is a fact.
> SC is not a snit sock although snit has posted as many socks.
> 
>> The rest of what you posted is true,.
>> Snit made all kinds of sexual advances towards Elizabot who at the time
>> was vulnerable as she, as a teen, was having teen issues.
> 
> While I was not around at that time, I did look in the archives and
> apparently snit had some kind of crush on this Elizabot and it got out of
> control.
> I really don't know and don't care about the details.
> 
>> Slimeball snit tried to take advantage of that situation as kind of a
>> teacher---student situation.
> 
> Yuck.
> 
> 
>> It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. My advice is
>> to not waste your time as pretty much everyone knows what a sleaze snit
>> is so proof is no longer necessary.
>> BTW I remember you.
> 
> 
> Snit landed in several gun groups which is where I first encountered him.
> He managed to piss off the regulars and after a couple of weeks of snit
> trying to set up his trolling he was politely asked to leave, which to his
> credit he did.
> After he was gone, some people posted older messages that involved snit
> and the general consensus was that snit had serious mental issues and the
> regulars, including me, were just happy he had the good sense to leave.
> Sadly snit has found other fertile ground for his trolling.
> My advice is to never reply to snit.

So stop giving me non-stop attention. Stop lying to get me to respond.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136873

On Aug 26, 2025 at 6:11:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<108llvm$cin8$1@dont-email.me>:

> On 2025-08-27, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com:
>> 
>>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>> news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>>> fair enough.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire
>>>>>>> thread with all in context.
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>> References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>>>>> <67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>> <XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>> <67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>> Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>>> <<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okO
>>>>>> iQG9qAAAJ>
>>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>>> posted here.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>>> displayed:
>>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>>> record of
>>>>>> the case.
>>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a
>>>>>> thorough background search of official public records.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>>> himself.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.
>>>>>> Neither side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12
>>>>>> would acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but
>>>>>> personal attacks on him and questionable documentation of
>>>>>> information which, frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>>> an accused troll.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>>> appeared all over the place.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>>> 
>>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>>>>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>>>>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to
>>>>> leave CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux
>>>>> groups.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>>> 
>>>> I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>>> years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>>> He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>>> sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>>> troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>>> about snit is probably mostly true.
>>>> Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>>>> Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs
>>>> because he is highly toxic.
>>>> There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>>> in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>>> used many sock puppets back then.
>>>> It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
>>>> individual.
>>>> Do your own research.
>>> 
>>> So he's a troll.
>>> 
>>> SO
>>> 
>>> FUCKING
>>> 
>>> WHAT?
>>> 
>>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>>> 
>>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>>> 
>>> Ignore it completely.
>>> 
>>> *plonk*
>> 
>> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a typical
>> troll.
>> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their employer
>> and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
>> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or
>> blaming others for what he himself has done.
>> 
>> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this but
>> I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long time
>> incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
>> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit sock.
>> It was Steve Caroll.
>> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save yourself
>> a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about snit.
>> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the
>> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit sock.
>> Cheers
>> 
> 
> Steve Carroll is not a snit sock.

Nobody is.

> the rest of what you posted is true,.
> Snit made all kinds of sexual advances towards Elizabot who at the time
> was vulnerable as she, as a teen, was having teen issues.

What a bizarre lie.

> Slimeball snit tried to take advantage of that situation as kind of
> a teacher---student situation.
> It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. My advice is to not
> waste your time as pretty much everyone knows what a sleaze snit is so proof is
> no longer necessary.
> BTW I remember you.

Your lies are getting more insane.

You are just mad I called out your white supremacist nonsense.

<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>

See: I bring receipts.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136902

On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:11:18 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:

>It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. 

You guys keep saying that but all I see are accusations.  No proof of
any of the charges you've made against him.
-- 
I do not think that horse is completely dead yet. 
Whip it some more. -   Siri Cruz

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136903

On Aug 27, 2025 at 8:03:55 AM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<mh7uakpuceuk4jftuaf1ndgmfrtujv2prs@4ax.com>:

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:11:18 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:
> 
>> It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself.
> 
> You guys keep saying that but all I see are accusations.  No proof of
> any of the charges you've made against him.

Ever.

And it has been going on for since 2004. Over 20 years of "Oh, we'll soon back
our claims." It is a very interesting study in tribalism and scapegoating.
Sadly this is what we see with MAGA, and you can see the same tribalism and
scapegoating in that group. Huge overlap with the white supremacists and other
groups.

In fact, I challenge folks to find examples of those who troll me who are not
MAGA or at least leaning heavily that way.


-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136874

On Aug 26, 2025 at 5:24:18 PM MST, "Octal" wrote
<XnsB347CFC48DB6Ajijq@209.160.120.41>:

> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com:
> 
>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>> news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
>>> 
>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>> fair enough.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>> Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire
>>>>>> thread with all in context.
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>> References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>>>> <67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>> <XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>> <67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>> Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>> 
>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>> <<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okO
>>>>> iQG9qAAAJ>
>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>> posted here.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>> displayed:
>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>> record of
>>>>> the case.
>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a
>>>>> thorough background search of official public records.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> 
>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>> himself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.
>>>>> Neither side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12
>>>>> would acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but
>>>>> personal attacks on him and questionable documentation of
>>>>> information which, frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>> an accused troll.
>>>> 
>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>> appeared all over the place.
>>>> 
>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>> 
>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>> 
>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>>>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>>>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to
>>>> leave CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux
>>>> groups.
>>>> 
>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>> 
>>> I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>> years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>> He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>> sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>> troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>> about snit is probably mostly true.
>>> Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>>> Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs
>>> because he is highly toxic.
>>> There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>> in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>> used many sock puppets back then.
>>> It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
>>> individual.
>>> Do your own research.
>> 
>> So he's a troll.
>> 
>> SO
>> 
>> FUCKING
>> 
>> WHAT?
>> 
>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>> 
>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>> 
>> Ignore it completely.
>> 
>> *plonk*
> 
> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a typical
> troll.
> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their employer
> and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or
> blaming others for what he himself has done.
> 
> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this but
> I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long time
> incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit sock.
> It was Steve Caroll.
> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save yourself
> a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about snit.
> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the
> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit sock.
> Cheers

Weird how I do all of that but never leave a crumb of evidence.


-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#136836

On Aug 25, 2025 at 5:56:53 PM MST, "Octal" wrote
<XnsB346D5181874Djijq@62.164.182.25>:

> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
> 
>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>> fair enough.
>>>> 
>>>> The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>> 
>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> 
>>>> From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>> Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire thread
>>>> with all in context.
>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>> 
>>>> Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>> References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>> <67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>> <XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>> <67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>> Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>> 
>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>> <<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okOiQG9qAAAJ>
>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was posted
>>> here.
>>> ---
>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>> displayed:
>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record
>>> of
>>> the case.
>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>>> background search of official public records.
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost a
>>> word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>> 
>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info about
>>> him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted himself.
>>> 
>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it appears
>>> you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>> 
>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.  Neither
>>> side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12 would acquit
>>> Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but personal attacks on
>>> him and questionable documentation of information which, frankly, has
>>> nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>> 
>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true of
>>> Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and lacking
>>> anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on an accused
>>> troll.
>> 
>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>> could easily be snit.
>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>> appeared all over the place.
>> 
>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was like
>> a troll farm in real life.
>> 
>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or one
>> of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>> 
>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to leave
>> CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux groups.
>> 
>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit and
>> see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a pariah
>> that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
> 
> I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20 years
> ago and I remember snit quite well.
> He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named sandman
> (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a troll.

And still failing. LOL! He ended up using an automated / semi-bot system.

> Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet about snit is
> probably mostly true.
> Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
> Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs because
> he is highly toxic.
> There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many in
> the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit used
> many sock puppets back then.
> It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
> individual.
> Do your own research.

No MID. No quote. Just mindless attacks. Boring.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.advocacy

csiph-web