Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.advocacy > #136873

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Aug 26, 2025 at 6:11:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<108llvm$cin8$1@dont-email.me>:

> On 2025-08-27, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com:
>> 
>>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>> news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>>> fair enough.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>>> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire
>>>>>>> thread with all in context.
>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>> References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>>>>> <67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>> <XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>> <67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>> Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>>> <<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okO
>>>>>> iQG9qAAAJ>
>>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>>> posted here.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>>> displayed:
>>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>>> record of
>>>>>> the case.
>>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a
>>>>>> thorough background search of official public records.
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>>> himself.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.
>>>>>> Neither side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12
>>>>>> would acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but
>>>>>> personal attacks on him and questionable documentation of
>>>>>> information which, frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>>> an accused troll.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>>> appeared all over the place.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>>> 
>>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>>>>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>>>>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to
>>>>> leave CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux
>>>>> groups.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>>> 
>>>> I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>>> years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>>> He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>>> sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>>> troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>>> about snit is probably mostly true.
>>>> Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>>>> Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs
>>>> because he is highly toxic.
>>>> There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>>> in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>>> used many sock puppets back then.
>>>> It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
>>>> individual.
>>>> Do your own research.
>>> 
>>> So he's a troll.
>>> 
>>> SO
>>> 
>>> FUCKING
>>> 
>>> WHAT?
>>> 
>>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>>> 
>>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>>> 
>>> Ignore it completely.
>>> 
>>> *plonk*
>> 
>> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a typical
>> troll.
>> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their employer
>> and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
>> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or
>> blaming others for what he himself has done.
>> 
>> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this but
>> I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long time
>> incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
>> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit sock.
>> It was Steve Caroll.
>> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save yourself
>> a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about snit.
>> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the
>> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit sock.
>> Cheers
>> 
> 
> Steve Carroll is not a snit sock.

Nobody is.

> the rest of what you posted is true,.
> Snit made all kinds of sexual advances towards Elizabot who at the time
> was vulnerable as she, as a teen, was having teen issues.

What a bizarre lie.

> Slimeball snit tried to take advantage of that situation as kind of
> a teacher---student situation.
> It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. My advice is to not
> waste your time as pretty much everyone knows what a sleaze snit is so proof is
> no longer necessary.
> BTW I remember you.

Your lies are getting more insane.

You are just mad I called out your white supremacist nonsense.

<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>

See: I bring receipts.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

Back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-26 00:56 +0000
  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 10:50 -0400
    Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-27 00:24 +0000
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-27 01:11 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> - 2025-08-27 01:38 +0000
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:21 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:23 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 11:03 -0400
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 15:16 +0000
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:24 +0000
  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:47 +0000

csiph-web