Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.advocacy > #136836

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Aug 25, 2025 at 5:56:53 PM MST, "Octal" wrote
<XnsB346D5181874Djijq@62.164.182.25>:

> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
> news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me:
> 
>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>> fair enough.
>>>> 
>>>> The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>> 
>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> 
>>>> From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>> Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>> Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire thread
>>>> with all in context.
>>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>> 
>>>> Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>> References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com>
>>>> <67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>> <XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>> <67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>> Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>> 
>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>> <<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/okOiQG9qAAAJ>
>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was posted
>>> here.
>>> ---
>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>> displayed:
>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete record
>>> of
>>> the case.
>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a thorough
>>> background search of official public records.
>>> ---
>>> 
>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost a
>>> word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>> 
>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info about
>>> him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted himself.
>>> 
>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it appears
>>> you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>> 
>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG.  Neither
>>> side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12 would acquit
>>> Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but personal attacks on
>>> him and questionable documentation of information which, frankly, has
>>> nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>> 
>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true of
>>> Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and lacking
>>> anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on an accused
>>> troll.
>> 
>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>> could easily be snit.
>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>> appeared all over the place.
>> 
>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was like
>> a troll farm in real life.
>> 
>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or one
>> of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>> 
>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to leave
>> CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux groups.
>> 
>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit and
>> see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a pariah
>> that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
> 
> I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20 years
> ago and I remember snit quite well.
> He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named sandman
> (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a troll.

And still failing. LOL! He ended up using an automated / semi-bot system.

> Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet about snit is
> probably mostly true.
> Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
> Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs because
> he is highly toxic.
> There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many in
> the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit used
> many sock puppets back then.
> It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable
> individual.
> Do your own research.

No MID. No quote. Just mindless attacks. Boring.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.

Back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-26 00:56 +0000
  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 10:50 -0400
    Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-27 00:24 +0000
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-27 01:11 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> - 2025-08-27 01:38 +0000
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:21 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:23 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 11:03 -0400
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 15:16 +0000
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:24 +0000
  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:47 +0000

csiph-web