Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.advocacy > #136859

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 2025-08-27, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:m7irakhak97e1e58aic2mdo25tej0d290g@4ax.com: 
>
>> On 26 Aug 2025 00:56:53 GMT, Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>>>news:108ijes$3lakm$3@dont-email.me: 
>>>
>>>> On 2025-08-25, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:50:55 +0100, "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 25/08/2025 01:47, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the MID is listed there. You missed the message -- which is
>>>>>>> fair enough. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The post should still be showing on all of the Usenet servers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>From: Gremlin <nobody@haph.org>
>>>>>>Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>>Subject: Re: SNIT Lying about his criminal record. THE entire
>>>>>>thread with all in context.
>>>>>>Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 04:27:04 -0000 (UTC)
>>>>>>Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Message-ID: <XnsB2A5496F48E7HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>
>>>>>>References: <MPG.4212f9f9770e054b989807@news.giganews.com> 
>>>>>><67aa4032$12$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> 
>>>>>><XnsB29FDEFBF81BFHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> 
>>>>>><67d10034$2$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
>>>>>>Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:27:06 +0100 (CET)
>>>>>
>>>>> A link to the "original thread" (dated 3/17/25) was found.
>>>>><<https://groups.google.com/g/alt.computer.workshop/c/S-pznwmU_pg/m/o
>>>>>kO iQG9qAAAJ> 
>>>>> It contains this description of the same unsourced list as was
>>>>> posted here.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Please be aware of the following limitations of the case records
>>>>> displayed:
>>>>> • The information may not be a current, accurate, or complete
>>>>> record of
>>>>> the case.
>>>>> • The information is subject to change at any time.
>>>>> • The information is not the official record of the court.
>>>>> • Not all cases from a participating court may be included.
>>>>> • The information should not be used as a substitute for a
>>>>> thorough background search of official public records.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> I read to the end and the post looks like more of the same bullshit
>>>>> I've been seeing here in this group.  A recent post here is almost
>>>>> a word for word repost of that thread and proved nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some moron claimed that Snit wasn't being doxxed, all the info
>>>>> about him was publicly available or found using stuff Snit posted
>>>>> himself. 
>>>>>
>>>>> This is why I'm so very careful to post as little PII as possible
>>>>> about myself.  Snit, I'm terribly sorry you got doxxed but it
>>>>> appears you gave them enough ammo to find their target.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, you girls need to go get a room, or maybe your own NG. 
>>>>> Neither side of the argument has proven anything.  A jury of 12
>>>>> would acquit Snit of being a troll since there is nothing but
>>>>> personal attacks on him and questionable documentation of
>>>>> information which, frankly, has nothing to do with Usenet trolling.
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that so many posters and socks are so obsessed with him
>>>>> tells me these folks lack drama in their lives.  I find that true
>>>>> of Trump voters as well.  They seem to have mistaken the American
>>>>> political process for the latest season of The Apprentice and
>>>>> lacking anything else to do, are taking their frustrations out on
>>>>> an accused troll. 
>>>> 
>>>> You miss one important point and that is those one hit wonder trolls
>>>> could easily be snit.
>>>> This is exactly how he behaved in CSMA years ago when he was, and
>>>> still is, shunned. Snit opened his sock drawer and the puppets
>>>> appeared all over the place. 
>>>> 
>>>> At one point snit had so many socks talking to each other it was
>>>> like a troll farm in real life.
>>>> 
>>>> Another point you fail at is that snit doesn't care if a person or
>>>> one of his socks agrees or disagrees with him.
>>>> All he craves is the attention and the need to control the chaos.
>>>> 
>>>> snit's socks were conversing, arguing, agreeing with each other
>>>> up until the point where nobody but snit and his sock puppets were
>>>> left because they were all ignored and snit had no choice but to
>>>> leave CSMA at which point snit moved on to COLA and other Linux
>>>> groups. 
>>>> 
>>>> I dare you to ask in COLA, CSMA, alt.linux,alt.os.linux about snit
>>>> and see what replies you get, if any.......To most people snit is a
>>>> pariah that folks are not interested in discussing however try it.
>>>> Let's see if you have the nerve.
>>>
>>>I used to post as Lund in the comp.sys.mac.advocacy group about 20
>>>years ago and I remember snit quite well.
>>>He was despised by pretty much everyone but another poster named
>>>sandman (I think?)  took particular delight in exposing snit as a
>>>troll. Not that it matters but whatever you dig up on the Internet
>>>about snit is probably mostly true.
>>>Not all of it of course, but the key points are certainly true.
>>>Unless he has changed his ways, I would avoid snit at all costs
>>>because he is highly toxic.
>>>There is another well known poster, Steve something or other that many
>>>in the group suspected was a snit sock but never proven although snit
>>>used many sock puppets back then.
>>>It's sad to see he hasn't croaked because snit is a despicable 
>>>individual.
>>>Do your own research. 
>> 
>> So he's a troll.
>> 
>> SO
>> 
>> FUCKING
>> 
>> WHAT?
>> 
>> He must be a really, REALLY masterful troll to have so many of you
>> this upset and obsessed with him.
>> 
>> There's only one way to deal with a troll.  ONE.
>> 
>> Ignore it completely.
>> 
>> *plonk*
>
> While your advice is spot on for the typical troll, snit is not a typical 
> troll.
> He doxxes people, contacts their family, friends, harasses their employer 
> and makes lewd advances towards young girls.
> And then he floods USeNet with accusations where he is projecting or 
> blaming others for what he himself has done.
>
> I do not expect you or anyone else to accept my word for any of this but 
> I will offer you some advice, ask snit about Elizabot as that long time 
> incident will show you everything you need to know about snit.
> Also I remembered the name of the person people thought was a snit sock. 
> It was Steve Caroll.
> All of this is in the comp.sys.advocacy groups but you can save yourself 
> a lot of time if you simple post a message there asking about snit.
> I doubt you will though because it seems you and snit are joined at the 
> hip. I don't know you so I am assuming you are not yet another snit sock.
> Cheers
>

Steve Carroll is not a snit sock.
the rest of what you posted is true,.
Snit made all kinds of sexual advances towards Elizabot who at the time
was vulnerable as she, as a teen, was having teen issues.
Slimeball snit tried to take advantage of that situation as kind of
a teacher---student situation.
It's all in Usenet archives so you can judge for yourself. My advice is to not
waste your time as pretty much everyone knows what a sleaze snit is so proof is
no longer necessary.
BTW I remember you.



-- 
pothead

"Our lives are fashioned by our choices. First we make our choices.
 Then our choices make us."
-- Anne Frank

Back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-26 00:56 +0000
  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 10:50 -0400
    Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Octal <octalfortitude@binary.net> - 2025-08-27 00:24 +0000
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-27 01:11 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> - 2025-08-27 01:38 +0000
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:21 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:23 +0000
        Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 11:03 -0400
          Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 15:16 +0000
      Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-27 04:24 +0000
  Re: Posted because I agree, and it is important Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-08-26 15:47 +0000

csiph-web