Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles (numbers 150 – 16945) — threaded view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date [asc]
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-11 16:06 +0000
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Winning? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:11 +0800
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> 2016-12-11 09:32 -0700
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Winning? Ralph Mowery <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> 2016-12-11 11:35 -0500
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:46 +0800
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 16:42 -0600
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2016-12-12 01:44 +0100
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 02:02 +0100
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> 2016-12-11 20:23 -0500
Re: [OT] Games must have winner? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:10 +0800
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: computers vs humans "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:12 +0800
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:14 +0800
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-12 08:41 +0000
Tic-tac-toe as an 100% electronic game? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 18:44 +0800
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:11 +0800
Re: The real and fair DIce of Solomon? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:13 +0800
Re: Fake randomness is still random? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:15 +0800
Re: Fake randomness is still random? Johan Nel <johan.nel@xsinet.co.za> 2016-12-12 16:46 +0200
Re: Fake randomness is still random? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:49 +0800
Re: Dice: mechanical vs electrical "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:51 +0800
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:00 -0500
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 23:03 +0800
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-12-12 07:08 -0800
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:17 -0500
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 23:30 +0800
Re: Fake randomness is still random? Adam Jensen <hanzer@riseup.net> 2016-12-12 10:35 -0500
Re: Fake randomness is still random? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-12-12 07:56 -0800
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:57 -0500
Re: Fake randomness is still random? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) 2016-12-12 16:41 +0000
Re: Fake randomness is still random? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 17:45 +0100
Re: Fake randomness is still random? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2016-12-12 16:51 +0000
Re: Fake randomness is still random? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 18:10 +0100
Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 10:02 -0800
Re: From randomness to astrology "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 02:28 +0800
Re: Randomness and Taro "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 02:28 +0800
Re: Dice: mechanical vs electrical bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 20:17 +0100
Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 21:27 +0800
Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-13 17:03 +0000
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2016-12-13 14:35 -0500
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> 2016-12-13 12:38 -0700
Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 21:02 +0000
Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-13 17:22 -0800
Re: Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-14 01:54 +0000
Re: Today i will talk about the essence of philosophy.. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2016-12-14 04:27 +0100
Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-14 10:22 +0100
Re: World Rubik Cube record: 4.73 seconds "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-14 18:24 +0800
Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? BartC <bc@freeuk.com> 2016-12-14 15:49 +0000
Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> 2016-12-14 16:01 +0000
Re: Declaration of Geneva: "sisters and brothers"? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2016-12-14 17:02 +0100

« Previous 1 ... 195 196 197 198 199 ... 314 Next »


csiph-web