Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
My C++ synchronization objects library was just updated Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-01-07 11:36 -0800
 
I have just updated my following projects Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-01-07 11:32 -0800
 
GIT Interview Questions and Answers (1 reply — unroll) Aarusha <mrdinfonet1@gmail.com> 2017-01-05 21:37 -0800
   → Re: GIT Interview Questions and Answers "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-01-07 00:04 +0800
 
Re: OT? New Years Resolution: Against All Odds???? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-01-01 20:28 +0800
 
SemaCondvar and SemaMonitor were updated to version 2.01 Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-31 20:26 -0800
 
And happy new year ! Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-31 17:39 -0800
 
SemaMonitor and SemaCondvar version 2.0 Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-31 17:31 -0800
 
Re: Coin Flip Experiment: "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-31 23:19 +0800
 
Here is the state of the art memory managers... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-20 09:23 -0800
 
jemalloc Delphi and Delphi XE interfaces Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-20 06:29 -0800
 
Research team sets new mark for 'deep learning' Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-17 12:31 -0800
 
Visibility algorithm (9 replies — unroll) malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-12-15 16:12 -0800
   → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 11:00 -0800
     → Re: Visibility algorithm malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com 2016-12-16 11:06 -0800
       → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 11:22 -0800
         → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 11:46 -0800
           → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 11:56 -0800
             → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 12:01 -0800
               → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 12:07 -0800
                 → Re: Visibility algorithm Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 15:05 -0800
                 → Re: Visibility algorithm fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-17 05:39 -0800
 
Read again... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-16 18:14 -0800
 
The essence of happiness.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-16 18:02 -0800
 
And i am also an inventor... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-16 16:02 -0800
 
Yet more about my projects... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-16 15:29 -0800
 
[OT] Play tic-tac-toe using e-Letters or i-Letters! (14 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-02 19:08 +0800
   → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 12:31 +0800
     → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> 2016-12-11 16:06 +0000
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Winning? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:11 +0800
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Winning? Ralph Mowery <rmowery28146@earthlink.net> 2016-12-11 11:35 -0500
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@On-My-Web-Site.com> 2016-12-11 09:32 -0700
         → Re: [OT] Games must have winner? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:10 +0800
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-11 17:26 +0000
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: computers vs humans "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:12 +0800
       → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> 2016-12-11 20:23 -0500
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 12:14 +0800
           → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2016-12-12 08:41 +0000
             → Tic-tac-toe as an 100% electronic game? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 18:44 +0800
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe strategy: Start in corners? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 10:02 -0800
         → Re: [OT] Tic-tac-toe? Sodoku? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-16 12:52 +0800
 
Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? (33 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 20:56 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> 2016-12-11 08:48 -0600
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:00 +0800
       → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2016-12-11 16:42 -0600
         → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:11 +0800
           → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:00 -0500
             → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 23:03 +0800
               → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-12-12 07:08 -0800
               → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:17 -0500
                 → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 23:30 +0800
                 → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? FromTheRafters <erratic@nomail.afraid.org> 2016-12-12 10:57 -0500
         → Re: The real and fair DIce of Solomon? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:13 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:05 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 00:46 +0800
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> 2016-12-12 01:44 +0100
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 02:02 +0100
     → Re: Dice: mechanical vs electrical "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:51 +0800
       → Re: Dice: mechanical vs electrical bartekltg <bartekltg@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 20:17 +0100
   → Re: Fake randomness is still random? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:15 +0800
     → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Johan Nel <johan.nel@xsinet.co.za> 2016-12-12 16:46 +0200
       → Re: Fake randomness is still random? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 22:49 +0800
         → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Adam Jensen <hanzer@riseup.net> 2016-12-12 10:35 -0500
           → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> 2016-12-12 07:56 -0800
     → Re: Fake randomness is still random? moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) 2016-12-12 16:41 +0000
       → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 17:45 +0100
       → Re: Fake randomness is still random? root <NoEMail@home.org> 2016-12-12 16:51 +0000
         → Re: Fake randomness is still random? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> 2016-12-12 18:10 +0100
           → Re: Randomness and Taro "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 02:28 +0800
         → Re: From randomness to astrology "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 02:28 +0800
   → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2016-12-13 14:35 -0500
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> 2016-12-13 12:38 -0700
       → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2016-12-14 14:45 -0500
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> 2016-12-13 21:02 +0000
     → Re: Fake random numbers? Bad programmers? Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> 2016-12-15 22:08 +0100
 
A comparatively efficient software for embedding secret information bits into nataural language texts Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> 2016-12-15 21:24 +0100
 
About the essence of richness... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2016-12-15 11:41 -0800

← Newer ~Page 185 of ~300 (articles 7161–7273) Older →


csiph-web