Re: Scalable locks...

From	Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid>
Organization	Go, ion artisan!
Subject	Re: Scalable locks...
Newsgroups	comp.programming
References	(1 earlier) <m26n9h$dj3$1@dont-email.me> <KLB1w.504226$rb.451721@fx16.am4> <m2b7fa$u1i$1@dont-email.me> <kB92w.567960$3F6.516168@fx02.am4> <20141023105051.417@kylheku.com>
Message-ID	<t0e2w.682635$m41.557114@fx34.am4> (permalink)
Date	2014-10-23 22:01 +0100

Show all headers | View raw

Kaz Kylheku wrote:

<snip>
 
> Ramine appears to be relying on a documented behavior of Sleep in MSDN:

Thanks, Kaz. Mea culpa and all that. I apologise to Ramine for the 
unwarranted criticism.

<snip>

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
  Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700
    Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-22 00:12 +0100
      Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 11:39 -0700
        Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 16:59 +0100
          Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 12:05 -0700
          Re: Scalable locks... Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-10-23 18:02 +0000
            Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 22:01 +0100

csiph-web