Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #4854
| From | Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Organization | Go, ion artisan! |
| Subject | Re: Scalable locks... |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| References | <m26lj4$8fu$1@dont-email.me> <m26n9h$dj3$1@dont-email.me> <KLB1w.504226$rb.451721@fx16.am4> <m2b7fa$u1i$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <kB92w.567960$3F6.516168@fx02.am4> (permalink) |
| Date | 2014-10-23 16:59 +0100 |
Ramine wrote: > On 10/21/2014 4:12 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> Ramine wrote: >> >>> The Sleep(0) is on Windows, to give up he time slice. >> >> That's only necessary if you're running Win9x, and even then only if >> you've got a 16-bit application. I suggest you upgrade to a decent >> operating system (or, if you prefer, Windows 7). > > The problem shows on Windows 2008 server too, so i had > to use sleep(0) to correct the problem. Is it your claim, then, that Windows 2008 server uses co-operative multitasking rather than pre-emptive? -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700
Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-22 00:12 +0100
Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 11:39 -0700
Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 16:59 +0100
Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 12:05 -0700
Re: Scalable locks... Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-10-23 18:02 +0000
Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 22:01 +0100
csiph-web