Scalable locks...

From	Ramine <ramine@1.1>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Scalable locks...
Date	2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<m26lj4$8fu$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,


Please read the following paper to know why i have invented my
scalable MLock:


http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/linux:lock.pdf


But you have to be carefull, the Ticket spinlock with a proportional
backoff is not good, cause if there is more context switch the thread
that is scheduled has to use all its quantum time and this will slow
a lot the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff , so you have
to use a Sleep(0) just after the proportional backoff to solve this 
problem, but i have benchmarked it by adding the sleep(0) and i have 
noticed that my scalable MLock will give better performance than
the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff and with a sleep(0)
just after the proportional backoff, so i advice you to use my scalable 
MLock instead cause it's faster and better.


You can download my scalable MLock from:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
  Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700
    Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-22 00:12 +0100
      Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 11:39 -0700
        Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 16:59 +0100
          Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 12:05 -0700
          Re: Scalable locks... Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-10-23 18:02 +0000
            Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 22:01 +0100

csiph-web