Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #4847

Re: Scalable locks...

From Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid>
Organization Go, ion artisan!
Subject Re: Scalable locks...
Newsgroups comp.programming
References <m26lj4$8fu$1@dont-email.me> <m26n9h$dj3$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID <KLB1w.504226$rb.451721@fx16.am4> (permalink)
Date 2014-10-22 00:12 +0100

Show all headers | View raw

Ramine wrote:

> 
> 
> The Sleep(0) is on Windows, to give up he time slice.

That's only necessary if you're running Win9x, and even then only if you've 
got a 16-bit application. I suggest you upgrade to a decent operating system 
(or, if you prefer, Windows 7).

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
  Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700
    Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-22 00:12 +0100
      Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 11:39 -0700
        Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 16:59 +0100
          Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-23 12:05 -0700
          Re: Scalable locks... Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-10-23 18:02 +0000
            Re: Scalable locks... Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-10-23 22:01 +0100

csiph-web