Re: Perl or C++ better

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: Perl or C++ better
Date	Mon, 17 Oct 2016 22:50:47 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	41
Message-ID	<nu3dik$e8f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<ntu6p5$uig$1@dont-email.me> <nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me> <nu2q1m$2np$1@dont-email.me> <nu2qn9$4e8$2@dont-email.me> <nu2v0d$m0s$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:50:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="11a6e5274d8247abd5cbd6447ddba363"; logging-data="14607"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uc5kW2cZxXue+YcP09YJgfnXYg0BgX3A="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
In-Reply-To	<nu2v0d$m0s$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:Bb2ZUy32BvDBbRK3MxFVGg1xsbU=
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:6976

Show key headers only | View raw

On 17/10/16 18:42, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> "David Brown" <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in message
> news:nu2qn9$4e8$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 17/10/16 17:17, Bill Cunningham wrote:
>>> "David Brown" <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in message
>>> news:nu254e$lsv$1@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>> ...
>>>> Try Python.  It will be simpler and clearer than C, C++ or Perl, and far
>>>> more flexible than Bash.  Since it is interactive and interpreted, it
>>>> can easily be used in a "trial and error" style that lets you see what
>>>> is happening (and what is going wrong).
>>>
>>>      Would it be good for scripts?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> Python is used for scripts, and for big applications.  It is a very
>> flexible and popular language.  Personally, I use it for most of my PC
>> and server programming, with C mainly for embedded systems.
>>
>
>      OK I see theres a 3.5.2 and a 2.x.x version. Or version 2. Should I go
> ahead and look at 3? THis would be better than Java too then right?
>

You might as well start with Python 3, since you are new to it.  But be 
aware that there is a lot of code around (and tutorials, books, etc.) 
that is Python 2.  For most purposes, Python 2 and 3 are compatible but 
there are a few key points.  In particular, "print" in Python 2 is a 
special statement - you can write "print 1 + 2".  In Python 3, "print" 
is a function - you write "print(1 + 2)".  Conveniently, the second form 
works fine in both versions.

IMHO, Python is "better" than Java for many uses - including your usage. 
  But "better" depends on what you are doing with the language.  Still, 
my advice stands - of all the languages I am familiar with, Python seems 
to me the best for you to learn here.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-15 17:24 -0400
  Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 11:20 +0200
    Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 11:17 -0400
      Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 17:29 +0200
        Re: Perl or C++ better "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-10-17 12:42 -0400
          Re: Perl or C++ better David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-10-17 22:50 +0200

csiph-web