Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5566
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: An advantage of RSA encryption |
| Date | Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:56:56 +0100 |
| Organization | go, ion artisan! |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <mpqjoo$aa9$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mpimf8$cc7$1@news.albasani.net> <mpj2fj$361$1@news.albasani.net> <mpjc91$jt2$1@news.albasani.net> <mplkff$vol$1@news.albasani.net> <mplpk5$9n6$1@news.albasani.net> <20150803102300.194@kylheku.com> <mpqc3n$1q6$1@news.albasani.net> <mpqd07$f8r$1@dont-email.me> <mpqden$416$4@news.albasani.net> <mpqe5v$jse$2@dont-email.me> <55C0BD04.5010305@t-online.de> <mpqffv$p3t$1@dont-email.me> <55C0C2E1.6050603@t-online.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:55:20 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bbec9967c55d39f11ca29ee1f0b15ce1"; logging-data="10569"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18svZG0KriOhtPpFso0tuQFhJ1RZvkYiTdkOL1Gtf32PQ==" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <55C0C2E1.6050603@t-online.de> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:EH845wQwbjx2dE4pxsPssIBpVxg= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming:5566 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 04/08/15 14:49, Mok-Kong Shen wrote: <snip> > The problem is: Evidently (unless one wants to argue for argument's > sake) the (common) case is that one doesn't yet have a CSPRNG and > wants to have such a one to generate PRNs for an application. Now > how does one proceed?? Either one is capable of writing one's own high-quality CSPRNG (in which case one wouldn't be asking the question), or one finds a good, reliable CSPRNG that is already publicly available for one's platform and which has been analysed by the cryptographic community and found to be fit for purpose. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 16:52 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-01 20:17 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 23:04 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 04:32 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-02 19:36 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 21:04 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-03 17:31 +0000
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 14:44 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:01 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:07 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:21 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:43 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:49 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 15:56 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:05 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0000
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:10 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 21:42 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:05 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 22:18 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:58 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:45 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:55 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 22:12 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-05 07:58 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 08:06 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 06:50 -0400
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-03 18:28 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 22:07 -0400
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-06 11:01 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:26 +0200
csiph-web