Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5577
| From | Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: An advantage of RSA encryption |
| Date | 2015-08-04 23:58 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <55C13599.7010902@t-online.de> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <20150804082415.66@kylheku.com> <55C11C23.9000503@t-online.de> <mpr811$vgc$2@dont-email.me> <55C12904.9020702@t-online.de> <mpra3k$846$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 04.08.2015 um 23:18 schrieb Richard Heathfield: > On 04/08/15 22:05, Mok-Kong Shen wrote: >> Am 04.08.2015 um 22:42 schrieb Richard Heathfield: >>> On 04/08/15 21:10, Mok-Kong Shen wrote: >>>> Am 04.08.2015 um 17:24 schrieb Kaz Kylheku: >>>>> On 2015-08-04, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>>> ok. Then please comment on what I wrote in parentheses. >>>>> >>>>> (dumb as a brick) >>>>> >>>> If you have good arguments, then give them. You are welcome to >>>> aid Heathfield in his argumentation. >>> >>> It's the other way round. I was expanding on Kaz's contribution, not he >>> on mine. Kaz knows a damn sight more about cryptography than I do. >> >> This is not important for the discussion. Important are your >> objective counterarguments to mine, if any. > > I didn't realise you had any arguments. I thought you were asking a > question. It seems to me that that question has been answered. > > You had a follow-up question asking about high quality CSPRNGs. I > haven't answered that because I don't have sufficient CSPRNG experience > to contribute what I would consider to be a sufficiently high quality > response to that question. You wrote "..... or one finds a good, reliable CSPRNG that is already publicly available for one's platform and which has been analysed by the cryptographic community and found to be fit for purpose." But an "analysis by the cryptographic community" that one can rely on can in my conviction only be the algorithm of the CSPRNG, e.g. what one reads in HAC. Software in closed-source is not trustworthy. Software in open-source has risks of the genre of Heartbleed. So one has IMHO to take one's own responsibility to implement oneself an algorithm from e.g. HAC. Is that clear? If you would prefer to let the discussion to be further carred out by Kylheku and me alone, that's certainly ok. However, his last post contained nothing of objective arguments, unfortunately. M. K. Shen
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 16:52 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-01 20:17 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 23:04 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 04:32 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-02 19:36 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 21:04 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-03 17:31 +0000
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 14:44 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:01 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:07 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:21 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:43 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:49 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 15:56 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:05 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0000
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:10 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 21:42 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:05 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 22:18 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:58 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:45 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:55 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 22:12 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-05 07:58 +0100
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 08:06 -0700
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 06:50 -0400
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-03 18:28 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 22:07 -0400
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-06 11:01 +0200
Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:26 +0200
csiph-web