Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5143
| From | Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: python.. |
| Message-ID | <f9veba9av26l9khst4jdlptg4rnopjtb08@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0af26812-0c8a-4459-a495-f0097939fe5f@googlegroups.com> <m90vt5$s3n$1@news.albasani.net> <87vbkb51pj.fsf@ixod.org> <ceecc911-cff7-4cd3-b90c-48534feb0397@googlegroups.com> |
| Organization | Forte - www.forteinc.com |
| Date | 2015-01-15 02:43 -0600 |
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:09:15 -0800 (PST), malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com wrote: >On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 5:49:14 PM UTC, Mark Carroll wrote: >> >> > If you have algorithms to implement that need big integers, then Python >> > is in my personal experience the best language to use, since you can >> > simply employ the common arithmetic operators. >> (snip) >> >> While I generally agree with the rest of your article, it's worth noting >> that this feature isn't actually all that unusual: for instance, I >> mentioned Erlang in this thread, that's just the same: >> >Yes, because as soon as you move away from holding variables in >registers, and thus having only a handful of types, adding high-level >big scalars is as easy as pie. >But it's great for little toy demo programs, not much use practically. >You hardly ever need big integers and arbitrary-precision floats, >and when you do, it's usually in the guts of encryption algorithms, >GUID generators, hashing functions and the like, which are best >written in low-level C. Dealing with currency is occasionally practical.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 06:20 -0800
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-06 11:24 -0800
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 16:32 -0800
Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-09 13:02 +0000
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-12 18:22 +0100
Re: python.. Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-01-12 17:49 +0000
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-13 16:09 -0800
Re: python.. Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-15 02:43 -0600
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-20 13:02 +0100
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:25 +0000
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:26 +0000
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-21 17:39 -0800
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-22 02:29 +0000
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-12 10:53 -0800
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-13 18:29 +0100
Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-13 18:15 +0000
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-13 15:16 -0800
Re: python.. Philip Shaw <jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> - 2015-01-23 04:46 +0000
csiph-web