Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #5141

Re: python..

Newsgroups comp.programming
Date 2015-01-13 16:09 -0800
References <0af26812-0c8a-4459-a495-f0097939fe5f@googlegroups.com> <m90vt5$s3n$1@news.albasani.net> <87vbkb51pj.fsf@ixod.org>
Message-ID <ceecc911-cff7-4cd3-b90c-48534feb0397@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: python..
From malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com

Show all headers | View raw


On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 5:49:14 PM UTC, Mark Carroll wrote:
> 
> > If you have algorithms to implement that need big integers, then Python
> > is in my personal experience the best language to use, since you can
> > simply employ the common arithmetic operators.
> (snip)
> 
> While I generally agree with the rest of your article, it's worth noting
> that this feature isn't actually all that unusual: for instance, I
> mentioned Erlang in this thread, that's just the same:
> 
Yes, because as soon as you move away from holding variables in 
registers, and thus having only a handful of types, adding high-level
big scalars is as easy as pie.
But it's great for little toy demo programs, not much use practically.
You hardly ever need big integers and arbitrary-precision floats,
and when you do, it's usually in the guts of encryption algorithms,
GUID generators, hashing functions and the like, which are best
written in low-level C.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 06:20 -0800
  Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-06 11:24 -0800
    Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 16:32 -0800
    Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-09 13:02 +0000
  Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-12 18:22 +0100
    Re: python.. Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-01-12 17:49 +0000
      Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-13 16:09 -0800
        Re: python.. Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-15 02:43 -0600
        Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-20 13:02 +0100
          Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:25 +0000
            Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:26 +0000
            Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-21 17:39 -0800
              Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-22 02:29 +0000
    Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-12 10:53 -0800
      Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-13 18:29 +0100
        Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-13 18:15 +0000
        Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-13 15:16 -0800
          Re: python.. Philip Shaw <jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> - 2015-01-23 04:46 +0000

csiph-web