Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5148
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: python.. |
| Date | 2015-01-20 19:26 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20150120112531.359@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <m90vt5$s3n$1@news.albasani.net> <87vbkb51pj.fsf@ixod.org> <ceecc911-cff7-4cd3-b90c-48534feb0397@googlegroups.com> <m9lg38$njt$1@news.albasani.net> <20150120111755.364@kylheku.com> |
On 2015-01-20, Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> wrote:
> On 2015-01-20, Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> wrote:
>> Concerning the last half of your last sentence: The programming effort
>> would IMHO be very much higher than in case a language like Python
>> is employed, noting also that in some practical contexts efficiency
>> isn't a very critical issue.
>
> Even when efficiency is critical, it is rarely (almost never) critical in such
> a way that nearly every line of an application has to be rewritten in
> something else.
>
> (That does occurs when the efficiency is "infinitely bad": the application has
> to run where that language is not available, and for some extraordinary
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> reasons, it is easier to rewrite the application than to port the language
> implementation.)
Or even ordinary reasons: such as, the language in question happens to be
closed source, and no freeware clone exists, or at least none good enough to
support the application.
Don't use that! :)
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 06:20 -0800
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-06 11:24 -0800
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 16:32 -0800
Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-09 13:02 +0000
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-12 18:22 +0100
Re: python.. Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-01-12 17:49 +0000
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-13 16:09 -0800
Re: python.. Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-15 02:43 -0600
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-20 13:02 +0100
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:25 +0000
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:26 +0000
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-21 17:39 -0800
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-22 02:29 +0000
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-12 10:53 -0800
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-13 18:29 +0100
Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-13 18:15 +0000
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-13 15:16 -0800
Re: python.. Philip Shaw <jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> - 2015-01-23 04:46 +0000
csiph-web