Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #5138
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-01-13 15:16 -0800 |
| References | <0af26812-0c8a-4459-a495-f0097939fe5f@googlegroups.com> <m90vt5$s3n$1@news.albasani.net> <d0e8bda9-6ad6-4118-85d6-bed389c121e5@googlegroups.com> <m93klu$54e$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Message-ID | <a2cf870d-3046-4a91-941c-00dbdecbf2f4@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: python.. |
| From | fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> |
W dniu wtorek, 13 stycznia 2015 18:29:37 UTC+1 użytkownik Mok-Kong Shen napisał: > Am 12.01.2015 um 19:53 schrieb fir: > > > this is not neccessary about speed, more > > about 'system integration', I just like to have > > a program in an exe form, it just seem nicer, > > feels like real program > > I am afraid I have not yet properly understood you. Hypothetically > assume that one doesn't know whether interpretation or complilation > is involved in the background and one simply gets something (one > "black box") with which one can obtain a correct result via clicking > on a button somewhere or writing a one-line command, what would be > the difference in feeling in the two cases? > > Anyway I personally dislike to run exe-files from other people for > security reasons. > I like exe's If i would get exe form python source i can compare it to c source exe etc (compilation it is for spped also but also for this, indeed i very dislike the interpreter code dependencies and also its vulnerability, that it is editable, readable etc exe is exe
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 06:20 -0800
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-06 11:24 -0800
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-06 16:32 -0800
Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-09 13:02 +0000
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-12 18:22 +0100
Re: python.. Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2015-01-12 17:49 +0000
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-13 16:09 -0800
Re: python.. Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-01-15 02:43 -0600
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-20 13:02 +0100
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:25 +0000
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-20 19:26 +0000
Re: python.. malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com - 2015-01-21 17:39 -0800
Re: python.. Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-01-22 02:29 +0000
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-12 10:53 -0800
Re: python.. Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-01-13 18:29 +0100
Re: python.. BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-01-13 18:15 +0000
Re: python.. fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-01-13 15:16 -0800
Re: python.. Philip Shaw <jnufcvyvuc@tznvy.pbz> - 2015-01-23 04:46 +0000
csiph-web