Re: An advantage of RSA encryption

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: An advantage of RSA encryption
Date	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:05:31 +0200
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	23
Message-ID	<55C11B0B.5030502@t-online.de> (permalink)
References	<mpimf8$cc7$1@news.albasani.net> <mpj2fj$361$1@news.albasani.net> <mpjc91$jt2$1@news.albasani.net> <mplkff$vol$1@news.albasani.net> <mplpk5$9n6$1@news.albasani.net> <20150803102300.194@kylheku.com> <mpqc3n$1q6$1@news.albasani.net> <mpqd07$f8r$1@dont-email.me> <mpqden$416$4@news.albasani.net> <mpqe5v$jse$2@dont-email.me> <55C0BD04.5010305@t-online.de> <mpqffv$p3t$1@dont-email.me> <55C0C2E1.6050603@t-online.de> <mpqjoo$aa9$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net fI1gNlBcCbUM+KH6l7QptCzZAaw0oo2zibbHGwsRKyT3hAuyBfCWa/vGkyXe+a/XMr4AvclZHm/wTn38eloyf66YIQBGIG3bxfcygiW80aOFOVarLkYH4MU2aaBE8Z6M
NNTP-Posting-Date	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="MuwNiOz/SIEAc+Kn/MyO6Ub6u1s7qevQLItNLzEp1xrQlb3ruR7SjTAHDhlkojVmWGQ5tES72OWtGtkyMao9PkD4lbr3xtROVpCeqKLYf5Tsu5PEkPyqpTXOfN7f0zqNJeNFtB/xfOOOHFJtvwWH0ZzSS2PERNomGyaRjqP6/X0="; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
To	Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
In-Reply-To	<mpqjoo$aa9$1@dont-email.me>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:K2FcfWvkT4Vxu1SZIyK+zsOsj/s=
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:5570

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 04.08.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Richard Heathfield:
> On 04/08/15 14:49, Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> The problem is: Evidently (unless one wants to argue for argument's
>> sake) the (common) case is that one doesn't yet have a CSPRNG and
>> wants to have such a one to generate PRNs for an application. Now
>> how does one proceed??
>
> Either one is capable of writing one's own high-quality CSPRNG (in which
> case one wouldn't be asking the question), or one finds a good, reliable
> CSPRNG that is already publicly available for one's platform and which
> has been analysed by the cryptographic community and found to be fit for
> purpose.

The one CSPRNG based on RSA that is described in HAC is a good,
reliable CSPRNG or not in your opinion? If yes, then one wants to
have that in doing an implementation accordingly. What's wrong with that???

M. K. Shen
W

Thread

An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 16:52 +0200
  Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-01 20:17 +0200
    Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-01 23:04 +0200
      Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 04:32 +0200
      Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-08-02 19:36 +0200
        Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-02 21:04 +0200
          Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-03 17:31 +0000
            Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 14:44 +0200
              Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:01 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:07 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:21 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 14:43 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:49 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 15:56 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:05 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-08-04 15:24 +0000
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 22:10 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 21:42 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:05 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-04 22:18 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 23:58 +0200
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:45 -0700
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 16:55 -0700
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-04 22:12 -0700
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-08-05 07:58 +0100
                Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 08:06 -0700
  Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-03 06:50 -0400
    Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-03 18:28 +0200
      Re: An advantage of RSA encryption "J. Clarke" <j.clarke.873638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 22:07 -0400
        Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-06 11:01 +0200
  Re: An advantage of RSA encryption Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> - 2015-08-04 15:26 +0200

csiph-web