Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads

comp.programming.threads

44786 articles, 6830 threads (numbers 65 – 45828) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data (11 replies — unroll) itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-07-16 05:31 -0700
   → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-16 11:49 -0700
     → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-07-16 23:08 -0700
       → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-17 00:00 -0700
         → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-07-17 13:29 +0530
           → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-17 08:30 -0700
             → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-07-18 00:43 -0700
               → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-18 10:41 -0700
                 → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data frege <gottlobfrege@gmail.com> 2011-07-20 22:18 -0700
   → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-07-17 16:43 -0700
     → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data itt ium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-07-18 00:44 -0700
       → Re: connection thread bottleneck due to contention on global data "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-07-23 23:18 -0700
 
Interlocked operations, volatile (19 replies — unroll) Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-13 09:43 -0700
   → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-13 20:03 +0200
   → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-13 15:24 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:13 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:17 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:37 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:41 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:44 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:31 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:52 -0700
       → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-14 03:06 -0700
         → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-14 06:16 -0700
           → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-14 17:20 +0200
             → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-14 09:19 -0700
           → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 08:52 -0700
             → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-07-14 10:51 -0700
               → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-14 23:05 +0200
           → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 08:49 -0700
     → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> 2011-07-14 00:48 -0700
   → Re: Interlocked operations, volatile frege <gottlobfrege@gmail.com> 2011-07-20 22:13 -0700
 
Passing generic data between thread (5 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-21 08:22 -0700
   → Re: Passing generic data between thread David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-06-21 22:02 -0700
     → Re: Passing generic data between thread ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-23 06:00 -0700
       → Re: Passing generic data between thread David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-06-24 16:14 -0700
         → Re: Passing generic data between thread Surinder Singh <surinder@teranews.com> 2011-07-18 23:26 +0530
   → Re: Passing generic data between thread sergejusz <sergejusz@gmail.com> 2011-07-19 21:50 -0700
 
Async cleanup of async tasks David Barrett-Lennard <davidbl@iinet.net.au> 2011-07-14 19:41 -0700
 
Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe (17 replies — unroll) jameskuyper <jameskuyper@gmail.com> 2011-07-07 15:25 -0700
   → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe sfuerst <svfuerst@gmail.com> 2011-07-07 16:12 -0700
     → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2011-07-07 22:41 -0400
     → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-07-08 12:47 -0700
       → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe sfuerst <svfuerst@gmail.com> 2011-07-08 13:11 -0700
         → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-07-08 16:56 -0700
         → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe Marcin Grzegorczyk <mgrzegor@poczta.onet.pl> 2011-07-09 23:55 +0200
           → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe sfuerst <svfuerst@gmail.com> 2011-07-09 18:40 -0700
   → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> 2011-07-08 01:16 +0200
     → some sane words, for sure "Greg A. Woods" <woods@robohack.org> 2011-07-07 18:33 -0700
     → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe jameskuyper <jameskuyper@gmail.com> 2011-07-08 08:34 -0700
       → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe sfuerst <svfuerst@gmail.com> 2011-07-08 10:47 -0700
         → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2011-07-09 06:57 -0400
           → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-09 13:59 +0200
             → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> 2011-07-09 14:45 +0200
             → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-07-10 15:47 -0700
               → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-11 13:38 +0200
             → Re: The threading specs in the standard: a new catastrophe Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> 2011-07-11 16:12 +0300
 
questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence (83 replies — unroll) Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-13 09:40 -0700
   → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-13 22:39 +0200
     → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-14 08:27 -0700
       → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 00:21 +0200
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-15 15:48 -0700
           → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-16 05:03 -0700
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 08:35 +0100
           → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 12:05 +0200
             → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 11:19 +0100
               → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 13:57 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 13:51 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 16:53 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 16:17 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 17:37 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-16 08:47 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 16:54 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-16 09:01 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 17:07 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-16 13:59 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 14:32 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-17 08:03 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-17 16:19 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-17 15:40 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-30 14:26 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-17 15:24 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-18 03:49 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-18 14:40 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-18 15:46 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-18 20:27 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-18 21:31 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-18 21:37 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-20 15:45 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-20 20:05 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-18 14:06 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 18:32 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-16 15:42 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-07-10 19:47 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-16 08:51 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 17:23 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 18:49 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-16 08:51 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 17:25 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 16:56 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-18 14:28 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-20 09:54 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-20 15:39 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-22 13:24 +0200
           → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 14:39 +0200
             → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 13:55 +0100
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-16 12:03 +0200
           → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-07-10 19:10 +0200
   → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-13 16:00 -0700
     → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-13 23:31 -0700
       → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-14 08:32 -0700
   → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-14 23:05 +0100
     → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-14 16:44 -0700
       → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-15 08:34 +0100
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-15 02:11 -0700
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-15 15:58 -0700
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 08:26 +0100
           → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-16 05:05 -0700
             → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-16 13:11 +0100
               → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-18 15:42 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-20 09:27 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-20 15:30 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-20 15:00 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-21 14:54 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-21 18:37 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-21 15:59 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-22 09:01 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-20 15:41 +0100
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-20 23:24 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-22 10:46 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-22 11:19 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-22 11:57 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-27 14:05 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-29 16:14 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-06-24 01:42 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-27 13:24 +0200
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Anthony Williams <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> 2011-07-01 02:25 -0700
                 → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-01 12:48 +0200
       → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-06-15 01:53 -0700
         → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-06-15 02:57 -0700
     → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-15 02:06 -0700
 
Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." (8 replies — unroll) Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-27 20:55 +0200
   → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-07-01 04:06 -0700
     → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-01 17:35 +0200
       → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-07-01 15:23 -0700
         → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-02 10:18 +0200
           → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> 2011-07-05 15:10 -0700
     → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonable amount of time." Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-07-02 13:59 +0200
       → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonableamount of time." Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-05 10:12 +0200
         → Re: C++0x, 29.3 p13 "[...] atomic stores visible [...] within a reasonableamount of time." Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-07-05 11:36 +0200
 
Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence (1 reply — unroll) Masakuni Oishi <yamasa@bsdhouse.org> 2011-07-02 11:15 -0700
   → Re: questions about memory_order_seq_cst fence Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-07-05 10:07 +0200
 
Mutex or reader writer lock (9 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-21 03:27 -0700
   → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-06-21 22:03 -0700
   → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-23 00:14 +0200
     → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-23 06:04 -0700
     → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-23 11:43 -0700
       → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-24 02:26 -0700
         → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-24 12:02 +0200
           → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-29 13:46 -0700
             → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-29 14:26 -0700
               → Re: Mutex or reader writer lock "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-29 20:30 -0700
 
Fastest way to extract data from producer-consumer shared queue (3 replies — unroll) ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-21 03:13 -0700
   → Re: Fastest way to extract data from producer-consumer shared queue "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> 2011-06-21 16:53 +0200
     → Re: Fastest way to extract data from producer-consumer shared queue ittium <ittium@gmail.com> 2011-06-23 06:19 -0700
       → Re: Fastest way to extract data from producer-consumer shared queue "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> 2011-06-23 17:08 +0200
 
CFP: Workshop on Transitioning to Multicore (TMC 2011) Jaeheon <jaeheon@gmail.com> 2011-06-14 18:12 +0000
 
Implicit memory barriers on x86 (16 replies — unroll) Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-07 13:47 -0700
   → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-06-08 10:11 -0700
     → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-08 12:53 -0700
   → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-08 20:29 +0200
     → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-08 12:48 -0700
       → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-08 23:41 +0200
         → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-08 22:19 -0700
         → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-06-09 16:25 -0700
   → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-10 14:19 -0700
     → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-06-11 02:57 -0700
       → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 09:21 -0700
         → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 22:26 +0200
     → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> 2011-06-11 12:31 +0200
       → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-13 09:51 -0700
     → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 12:30 -0700
       → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 22:18 +0200
         → Re: Implicit memory barriers on x86 Rani Sharoni <ranisharoni75@gmail.com> 2011-06-11 13:31 -0700
 
False sharing (15 replies — unroll) curious <curious.oskar58@gmail.com> 2011-05-30 04:26 -0700
   → Re: False sharing Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-05-30 22:29 +0200
     → Re: False sharing curious <curious.oskar58@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 03:21 -0700
       → Re: False sharing Marcel Müller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.com> 2011-05-31 15:41 +0200
         → Re: False sharing curious <curious.oskar58@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 10:18 -0700
         → Re: False sharing Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 20:10 +0200
       → Re: False sharing Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 20:37 +0200
         → Re: False sharing Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 21:18 +0200
           → Re: False sharing curious <curious.oskar58@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 14:40 -0700
             → Re: False sharing "Balog Pal" <pasa@lib.hu> 2011-06-01 03:17 +0200
             → Re: False sharing Edek <edek.pienkowski@gmail.com> 2011-06-01 22:20 +0200
         → Re: False sharing curious <curious.oskar58@gmail.com> 2011-05-31 14:29 -0700
   → Re: False sharing David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> 2011-05-31 14:12 -0700
   → Re: False sharing "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-11 15:34 -0700
     → Re: False sharing "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-11 19:56 -0700
       → Re: False sharing "Chris M. Thomasson" <cristom@charter.net> 2011-06-11 21:07 -0700

← Newer ~Page 683 of ~683 (articles 265–472) Older →

csiph-web