Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2042

Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue

Path	csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	"Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.programming.threads
Subject	Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue
Date	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:19:50 -0800
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	13
Message-ID	<lb71in$ut0$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	PomiWpvG4e2y0HvOhU0dhw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
X-MimeOLE	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader	Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
Importance	Normal
X-Priority	3
X-MSMail-Priority	Normal
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming.threads:2042

Show key headers only | View raw

> "Alexander Krizhanovsky"  wrote in message 
> news:b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com...

> I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX 
> Disruptor.

FWIW, check this out:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lock-free/acjQ3-89abE/discussion

AFAICT, it is the basically the best one can get wrt a _single_ MPMC strict
bi-directional FIFO Queue.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue Alexander Krizhanovsky <akrizh@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-15 08:35 -0800
  Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 14:19 -0800

csiph-web