Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2042
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue |
| Date | 2014-01-15 14:19 -0800 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <lb71in$ut0$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com> |
> "Alexander Krizhanovsky" wrote in message > news:b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com... > I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX > Disruptor. FWIW, check this out: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lock-free/acjQ3-89abE/discussion AFAICT, it is the basically the best one can get wrt a _single_ MPMC strict bi-directional FIFO Queue.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue Alexander Krizhanovsky <akrizh@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-15 08:35 -0800 Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 14:19 -0800
csiph-web