Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2041 > unrolled thread

NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming.threads

Contents

  NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue Alexander Krizhanovsky <akrizh@googlemail.com> - 2014-01-15 08:35 -0800
    Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-01-15 14:19 -0800

#2041 — NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue

I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX Disruptor. The last time is in discussion at Hacker News. In LinkedIn discussions I also was asked about boost::lockfree::queue (it appeared in Boost recently). So I'm writing the post to share the answers.

http://natsys-lab.blogspot.ru/2014/01/natsys-lock-free-queue-in-comparison.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2042

> "Alexander Krizhanovsky"  wrote in message 
> news:b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com...

> I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX 
> Disruptor.

FWIW, check this out:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lock-free/acjQ3-89abE/discussion

AFAICT, it is the basically the best one can get wrt a _single_ MPMC strict
bi-directional FIFO Queue. 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming.threads

csiph-web