Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads
Subject: Re: NatSys Lock-free Queue vs LMAX Disruptor vs boost::lockfree::queue
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:19:50 -0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <lb71in$ut0$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: PomiWpvG4e2y0HvOhU0dhw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Xref: csiph.com comp.programming.threads:2042

> "Alexander Krizhanovsky"  wrote in message 
> news:b0f0ec88-399a-407a-87a2-41c9c5df7007@googlegroups.com...

> I've been asked many times how our lock-free queue differs from LMAX 
> Disruptor.

FWIW, check this out:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lock-free/acjQ3-89abE/discussion

AFAICT, it is the basically the best one can get wrt a _single_ MPMC strict
bi-directional FIFO Queue.