Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #2974

Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.mail.misc, comp.os.linux.networking
Subject	Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'?
Date	16 Jun 2014 20:31:43 GMT
Organization	NOYB
Lines	40
Message-ID	<c092hfFthe7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<lnktsq$2kt$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace	individual.net 5lfk97VTQPgAhX81jeU/bAGN3/c5LEHL6s1+z7pCZ4auQ4VdCz
X-Orig-Path	not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock	sha1:f169GDGLx0HrBFOCm9f5fkh9kUc=
User-Agent	tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.0/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.mail.misc:653 comp.os.linux.networking:2974

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2014-06-07, not.socialnetwork@gmail.com <not.socialnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:
> ]> This http-based gmail is intolerable!
> 
> ]You can configure Gmail to allow you IMAP access if you don't like
> ]their web interface.
> 
> IIRC that needs always on-line. You can't:
> = fetch the headers & go off-line;
> = mark which one's to d/l or delete when next going on line.

  You seem to be confusing ("Yeah, *right*!"), the web-mailer 'Gmail'
with the MSP (Mail SP) 'Gmail' (or, even worse, the 'app' Gmail). If
you're using IMAP (or POP) you're using the MSP 'Gmail', not the
web-mailer 'Gmail'.

  So whether you can do what you want depends on your MUA (Mail User
Agent [1] aka 'mailer'), not on the MSP 'Gmail'.

  Any decent IMAP/POP3 mailer can do what you want. If you 'need'
recommendations, I suggest you ask (in 'this' group (CMM) or in a Linux
mail(er) group).

> ]And stop morphing: this is the sixth address I have for you in my
> ]scorefile.
> 
> This forum is for adults to exchange technical info.
> If you want to do personality stalking, there are reportedly facilities
> elsewhere.

  EMAK is bad. Your "personality stalking" 'argument' is utterly
misguided/misplaced, because it attempts to put blame on the reader
instead of on you, the poster. *Your* EMAK behaviour is especially bad,
because you keep bringing up the same 'problems' and are not interested
in solutions, you only want to hear that your 'problems' are indeed
problems, but they never are. Case in point: This very OP. So grow up or
shut up.

[1] Yes, that is largely simplified. Mind you we're talking to/at Chris
Glur! :-(

Thread

Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2014-06-15 19:58 +0000
  Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-06-16 13:34 -0400
  Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2014-06-16 20:31 +0000
    Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-16 14:06 -0700
      Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-06-16 22:09 +0100
        Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-16 16:07 -0700
      Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2014-06-17 20:48 +0000

csiph-web