Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #2972 > unrolled thread

Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'?

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.networking

Contents

  Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2014-06-15 19:58 +0000
    Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-06-16 13:34 -0400
    Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2014-06-16 20:31 +0000
      Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-16 14:06 -0700
        Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-06-16 22:09 +0100
          Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-16 16:07 -0700
        Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2014-06-17 20:48 +0000

#2972 — Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'?

On 2014-06-07, not.socialnetwork@gmail.com <not.socialnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:
]> This http-based gmail is intolerable!

]You can configure Gmail to allow you IMAP access if you don't like
]their web interface.

IIRC that needs always on-line. You can't:
= fetch the headers & go off-line;
= mark which one's to d/l or delete when next going on line.

]And stop morphing: this is the sixth address I have for you in my
]scorefile.

This forum is for adults to exchange technical info.
If you want to do personality stalking, there are reportedly facilities
elsewhere.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2973

On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:

> On 2014-06-07, not.socialnetwork@gmail.com <not.socialnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:
> ]> This http-based gmail is intolerable!
>
> ]You can configure Gmail to allow you IMAP access if you don't like
> ]their web interface.
>
> IIRC that needs always on-line. You can't:
> = fetch the headers & go off-line;
> = mark which one's to d/l or delete when next going on line.
>
> ]And stop morphing: this is the sixth address I have for you in my
> ]scorefile.
>
> This forum is for adults to exchange technical info.
> If you want to do personality stalking, there are reportedly facilities
> elsewhere.
>
>
NO, he doesn't want to stalk you, he wants to avoid you.  But since you 
keep morphing, he keeps stepping in your messages.

I don't care what someone wants to call themselves on the internet, but I 
really don't respect people who go around without a consistent "name".

   Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2974

no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2014-06-07, not.socialnetwork@gmail.com <not.socialnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:
> ]> This http-based gmail is intolerable!
> 
> ]You can configure Gmail to allow you IMAP access if you don't like
> ]their web interface.
> 
> IIRC that needs always on-line. You can't:
> = fetch the headers & go off-line;
> = mark which one's to d/l or delete when next going on line.

  You seem to be confusing ("Yeah, *right*!"), the web-mailer 'Gmail'
with the MSP (Mail SP) 'Gmail' (or, even worse, the 'app' Gmail). If
you're using IMAP (or POP) you're using the MSP 'Gmail', not the
web-mailer 'Gmail'.

  So whether you can do what you want depends on your MUA (Mail User
Agent [1] aka 'mailer'), not on the MSP 'Gmail'.

  Any decent IMAP/POP3 mailer can do what you want. If you 'need'
recommendations, I suggest you ask (in 'this' group (CMM) or in a Linux
mail(er) group).

> ]And stop morphing: this is the sixth address I have for you in my
> ]scorefile.
> 
> This forum is for adults to exchange technical info.
> If you want to do personality stalking, there are reportedly facilities
> elsewhere.

  EMAK is bad. Your "personality stalking" 'argument' is utterly
misguided/misplaced, because it attempts to put blame on the reader
instead of on you, the poster. *Your* EMAK behaviour is especially bad,
because you keep bringing up the same 'problems' and are not interested
in solutions, you only want to hear that your 'problems' are indeed
problems, but they never are. Case in point: This very OP. So grow up or
shut up.

[1] Yes, that is largely simplified. Mind you we're talking to/at Chris
Glur! :-(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2975

["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.networking.]
On 2014-06-16, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
> no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 2014-06-07, not.socialnetwork@gmail.com <not.socialnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ]> This http-based gmail is intolerable!
>> 
>> ]You can configure Gmail to allow you IMAP access if you don't like
>> ]their web interface.

Huh, this was me, wasn't it?  Of course ''Chris Glur'' screwed up the
quoting, as we should expect.

>> ]And stop morphing: this is the sixth address I have for you in my
>> ]scorefile.
>> 
>> This forum is for adults to exchange technical info.

Adults don't morph their From: headers.

>> If you want to do personality stalking, there are reportedly facilities
>> elsewhere.

If you don't want people ''stalking'' you, stop morphing your From:
headers, so that our scorefiles can be applied to your posts.

>   EMAK is bad.

EMAK?  I did a quick web search but didn't find anything applicable
(granted I didn't search that hard).

--keith

-- 
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2976

Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> writes:
> On 2014-06-16, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
>>   EMAK is bad.
>
> EMAK?  I did a quick web search but didn't find anything applicable
> (granted I didn't search that hard).

“Excessive Morphing to Avoid Killfiles”.

-- 
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2977

On 2014-06-16, Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> writes:
>> On 2014-06-16, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
>>>   EMAK is bad.
>>
>> EMAK?  I did a quick web search but didn't find anything applicable
>> (granted I didn't search that hard).
>
> ???Excessive Morphing to Avoid Killfiles???.

GAAAH!  /me smacks head, I should have figured that out!

EMAK is not just bad, it's evil.  Only trolls do EMAK.

--keith

-- 
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2978

Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.networking.]
[Ignored because I subscribe (only) to comp.mail.misc.]
> On 2014-06-16, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
[...]
> >   EMAK is bad.
> 
> EMAK?  I did a quick web search but didn't find anything applicable
> (granted I didn't search that hard).

  Excessive Morphing to Avoid Killfiles

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.networking

csiph-web