Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mail.misc > #653
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mail.misc, comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? |
| Date | 2014-06-16 20:31 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <c092hfFthe7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <lnktsq$2kt$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2014-06-07, not.socialnetwork@gmail.com <not.socialnetwork@gmail.com> wrote:
> ]> This http-based gmail is intolerable!
>
> ]You can configure Gmail to allow you IMAP access if you don't like
> ]their web interface.
>
> IIRC that needs always on-line. You can't:
> = fetch the headers & go off-line;
> = mark which one's to d/l or delete when next going on line.
You seem to be confusing ("Yeah, *right*!"), the web-mailer 'Gmail'
with the MSP (Mail SP) 'Gmail' (or, even worse, the 'app' Gmail). If
you're using IMAP (or POP) you're using the MSP 'Gmail', not the
web-mailer 'Gmail'.
So whether you can do what you want depends on your MUA (Mail User
Agent [1] aka 'mailer'), not on the MSP 'Gmail'.
Any decent IMAP/POP3 mailer can do what you want. If you 'need'
recommendations, I suggest you ask (in 'this' group (CMM) or in a Linux
mail(er) group).
> ]And stop morphing: this is the sixth address I have for you in my
> ]scorefile.
>
> This forum is for adults to exchange technical info.
> If you want to do personality stalking, there are reportedly facilities
> elsewhere.
EMAK is bad. Your "personality stalking" 'argument' is utterly
misguided/misplaced, because it attempts to put blame on the reader
instead of on you, the poster. *Your* EMAK behaviour is especially bad,
because you keep bringing up the same 'problems' and are not interested
in solutions, you only want to hear that your 'problems' are indeed
problems, but they never are. Case in point: This very OP. So grow up or
shut up.
[1] Yes, that is largely simplified. Mind you we're talking to/at Chris
Glur! :-(
Back to comp.mail.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? no.top.post@gmail.com - 2014-06-15 19:58 +0000
Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2014-06-16 13:34 -0400
Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2014-06-16 20:31 +0000
Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-06-16 14:06 -0700
Re: HOW2 test ssh 'separately'? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2014-06-17 20:48 +0000
csiph-web