Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #14911

Re: Let's not bluff ourselves.

From Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc, alt.os.linux.slackware, alt.os.linux.debian
Subject Re: Let's not bluff ourselves.
Date 2015-06-11 11:19 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mlcjc8$e67$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <mlcha9$5uk$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/11/2015 10:42 AM, no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
> we can't be free of the crushing heel of M$.

	Oh sure you can.
	Just run an old version of XP in VB.
	I see this is cross-posted so maybe the OP is a Troll
if so let me know and I will plunk him.

>
> Government transactions which you must comply with don't follow
> *nix [open standards].
> You are forced to have an "up to date Microsoft compatible system".
>
> So you just have a dual/multi-bootable system, with the first
> partitions given to M$.
>
> That worked OK, until I needed to attatch a fd0 device for some
> unusual reason.
> Although I normally boot into Slakware from a USBstik, with BIOS:
> 1stboot-device=hard-disk  Debian-Wheezy's grub had made a nice
> ability to also boot to M$-Win7 [fancy]. But after messing with the
> fd0, grub seems to be messed too.

	Well that is hard.  But is it Grub or GRUB2?
>
> Some years back, it was interesting to investigate grub, but I don't
> want to do that again.

	Too bad.  I never want to spend my time but I do not want
to use Windows very much.  I keep it on my machine against extreme
need such as helping someone who must use it.

> Is grub too smart, and reconfigures itself as the devices change?
> Eg: devices are no longer hdxN, but the <actual device ID>
> and hdx has become sdy.

	GRUB2 is the current choice for dealing with Windows 8
and higher systems.  It is just about smart enough.
>
> fdisk, cfdisk, sfdisk, *parted* ... etc. are all inconsistent,
> because M$ holds the keys to the gate.
> And the extra pre/dummy partition that Win* now uses ?

	No dummy partitions, each has a purpose. Windows Boot Manger in
one, efi in the other.  When booting a Linux system with Secure Boot
turned off efi is mounted as /boot/efi.  I took my current Windows
partion from 700 GiB to <60 GiB and made a data partition in case
I need to share or actually create something on Windows of <100 GiB.

	GPartEd is the best option for setting up Linux partitions before 
installation After the Windows partition is reduced by its own
tools.  If you Google or whatever on "Reducing Windows Partition"
you should find a method for reduction of the page file size

	On Mageia 5 RC and even on Mageia 4.1 I had no problems
and currently access Windows 8.1 by NOT hitting escape at boot up.
then waiting until the menu shows up and choosing the Mageia option
on the hard disk then picking a version of Mageia or whatever system
you are using.  Not all systems are ready for UEFI but if you
scan the .iso file you should see an efi partition,  Some like
Fedora have shims that let you continue to use Secure Boot.
	Of course that is extra protection if whoever is there without
your permission may be un-knowledgeable and not know how to turn it
off.  So put a password on your (U)EFI BIOS access whatever you
do.

>
> Perhaps a safer/more-stable method is to "come in the front door"
> and use loadlin to got to the various linux?
> loadlin has only got 3,4,5 simple args.
>
> WDYS?
>
	Well I don't know loadlin but I used to use LiLo and I hear
there is an e-Lilo in the works but GRUB2 is the current choice.

	Which Linux distribution are you using?

	What sort of hardware are you using?


	bliss

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Let's not bluff ourselves. no.top.post@gmail.com - 2015-06-11 17:42 +0000
  Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-11 11:19 -0700
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Harold Stevens <wookie@cindy.localdomain> - 2015-06-11 14:33 -0500
      Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-11 14:06 -0700
        Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2015-06-15 19:09 +0100
          Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-06-16 01:37 +0200
            Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-15 18:13 -0700
              Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2015-06-16 09:14 +0200
              Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-06-16 23:08 +0000
                Re: Let's not bluff ourselves.  Off topic!! Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-16 18:40 -0700
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-06-11 22:40 -0400
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2015-06-12 11:32 +0200
      Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-12 07:27 -0700
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2015-06-14 19:37 -0700
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. no.top.post@gmail.com - 2015-06-19 04:48 +0000
  Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Andreas Kohlbach <june15.6.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2015-06-11 17:25 -0400
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2015-06-12 09:04 +0100
      Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-06-14 23:14 +0000
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2015-06-15 14:24 +0000
  Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-06-11 22:32 -0400
    Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2015-06-13 16:06 -0400
      Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2015-06-13 13:47 -0700
      Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2015-06-13 20:14 -0400
        Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-06-14 23:15 +0000
  Re: Let's not bluff ourselves. noydb@no.way (Bruce Sinclair) - 2015-06-14 23:12 +0000

csiph-web