Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372794 > unrolled thread

owl - please test

Started by	Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
First post	2016-09-25 22:25 +0000
Last post	2016-09-27 12:01 -0700
Articles	19 — 7 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

  owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:25 +0000
    Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 22:31 +0000
      Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:44 +0000
        Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:47 -0700
        Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 23:06 +0000
          Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:17 +0000
      Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:45 -0700
        Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:47 +0000
      Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:43 -0700
        Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-28 18:02 +0000
        Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-28 19:46 -0400
          Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 17:14 -0700
    Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
      Re: owl - please test Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 19:02 +0000
        Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 19:10 +0000
          Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:32 -0700
          Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 12:46 -0700
        Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:33 -0700
      Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:01 -0700

#372794 — owl - please test

From	Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date	2016-09-25 22:25 +0000
Subject	owl - please test
Message-ID	<hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#372796

From	"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date	2016-09-25 22:31 +0000
Message-ID	<oad.g0utas8@perch.invalid>
In reply to	#372794

Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi owl, 
> 
> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
> 
> - -- 
> Marek Novotny
> https://github.com/marek-novotny
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
> =zo4t
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Good signature.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#372799

From	Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date	2016-09-25 22:44 +0000
Message-ID	<f6udnfCAS7r2znXKnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#372796

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2016-09-25, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Hi owl, 
>> 
>> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
>> 
>> - -- 
>> Marek Novotny
>> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>> 
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>> =zo4t
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> Good signature.

Okay, would you mind signing a post back to me so I can test they other
half of this which is my being able to verify you via slrn as well.

Thanks for doing this by the way. Getting there. 

- -- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=TINB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#372803

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2016-09-25 15:47 -0700
Message-ID	<87342db7-bebb-46e3-aba2-69e7ee306e9e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#372799

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:45:07 PM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2016-09-25, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> > Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> Hi owl, 
> >> 
> >> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
> >> 
> >> - -- 
> >> Marek Novotny
> >> https://github.com/marek-novotny
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v1
> >> 
> >> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
> >> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
> >> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
> >> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
> >> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
> >> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
> >> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
> >> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
> >> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
> >> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
> >> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
> >> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
> >> =zo4t
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > Good signature.
> 
> Okay, would you mind signing a post back to me so I can test they other
> half of this which is my being able to verify you via slrn as well.
> 
> Thanks for doing this by the way. Getting there. 
> 
> - -- 
> Marek Novotny
> https://github.com/marek-novotny
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6FNrAAoJEC9nkebvym+hLj0QAJeVnLes5O5rbrykiQXw6fP0
> 3tF3pcYsPeNw9bf19CT+93x7Txqk9tg90y5D5JZxS++amOIL5tE62tMPXfEV4Stx
> IgQiwZ1H/6qeQxnME+Gk6kFZmc1n5gwsZhGxR/Hd/Ux5qUDBKaG3hL/Q4VKesGGn
> 6uix6N5kGB2qAirazjr6nAUd9J33PzeKwGQTnedkZcQ84Av3MFRt9NwUuSk2KP+3
> Ej2iIi+KmSAKITPfsd0Hbt9RaOAlzMd+Uewjq5vnMuttMqtLRe+j2ZLEk0Rro8iW
> 3byE58/4U6vud1RvQ1iNDhQ5WCyuzeHYiX2+I0DjecOEUDkgnGDu0tzKUPL8CZ1a
> ESWM+rG1Zs4j0ul3lqfJ2tsdt9Fmxa/yt7+Ep8oh4qgFIdEJ95VaAxxjg4WSDTGL
> osHjuwII+Ey2P5VP9TuFtLuZvcPDCeNdwjyPvK1st3IxDH5g957Mv73zcpK6GH7n
> qJT+vVwpn8oXN+BSP9mba3H89SX2wBrkDPtFGmdt6fBAEDiQqJDY1iV12YUNtEOv
> wLYVrMLjMAaKtxIRF8u6rl7bvZMxfP1D11sFcvCYCyQPfSuhUNP6VbENQgmOnMAa
> uHSEpdyxfuJ8qHizYE7zYKJZxMG/8fTLx7iQ0a66jZ9MpHRBKbbtXIttI0Vabk7v
> mV7mKI/MfxIx/y+Qkg//
> =TINB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I just installed slrn, having trouble here and there ;)

I had it working, at least to read, but I broke it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=f8Gl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#372807

From	"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date	2016-09-25 23:06 +0000
Message-ID	<hagiagu88.axu@perch.invalid>
In reply to	#372799

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:

>>
>> Good signature.
>
> Okay, would you mind signing a post back to me so I can test they other
> half of this which is my being able to verify you via slrn as well.
>
> Thanks for doing this by the way. Getting there.
>

No problem

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJX6FdKAAoJEPmLqQ2wmEqr9CMH/1C0K1FxsIJ1DyU1yTFYrxVq
bm24Qs41bKXbmUfa70s4gO+u4iV4iEfY62lkXik3ZHdFnI0MHo2e9lzddtIDReD+
stLf//X9iZ5rnF8vfCF6XfWvx8c73QbJ3HAljc9qPKLEsSzIBTKQQMTiIbw/s0+b
M7zz2uZnEtS/XGZaWC3/4o2EIMLZoBCiHAxBmtBdzgTYYROTkW35IqwFiPEQ2N9e
yk5lWHSLM98VWngpz36t3TVX71DKWzwtLYZKRHrphXE6tuH4HVMCAIv/jWGFPJGd
8Y4BT437QNHBx0fS+G0QxumjzNWRqRDGmloBAbjyC6arG6+H9xtmSPkqsNVlly4=
=XVqd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#372810

From	Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date	2016-09-25 23:17 +0000
Message-ID	<RaydnUDTSK6cxnXKnZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#372807

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2016-09-25, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Good signature.
>>
>> Okay, would you mind signing a post back to me so I can test they other
>> half of this which is my being able to verify you via slrn as well.
>>
>> Thanks for doing this by the way. Getting there.
>
> No problem

Yup, that works! Thanks!

- -- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6FsBAAoJEC9nkebvym+hFaUP/091vDhZ7mjtJRkGlEKR2rRR
D8U7E3fSsUWTShgoQY5jAqeex/T2mbHkXN/WBXqQnYZoJNSPfFEaYiwyp6rzyyhD
IphBeItM4I7Mj3LENMMks1gxNlqYo0Y5+kqeYrafAxm7PXwp2xo9OWIAEO3h7I3l
pqGbqRr5FM1jV4qWjrg1XTR/YyfFLPBCL9JE/DNcN4jjYKIdWVxiFWFYM8gaMzeh
zdYdrFZeXuMuHb0suOHcOsqoj9o3gCOV9X2R9WfcdJOS2d2hcbx4//r2hcw+1Tqp
w/WdPpzXq4wIYcIcpI1BmiYQ60IGizFSGjkZ11thkP4x752YENKhMAJ1VEwzq0GT
mBEXX2bAzjEFIkE3yJl9Gn8ymUDoqxLYdNZfLNNh2naOwNtrjId/+96UPQyIvoOx
5drjJUYfhu5h6JKmvbKi8LkXVfxPFPWrStcI/jA0llvVpp5fNcZudLzM9zu5mmPK
iL6MVh4h2Unle7ReNRxi50vBHmaAV8rv5UOAQhl15HHIYRnqLwkhnCZTyQGwkMY5
qcFsD6GXR3A0T5bGSV6X6gxBmZ45yNupf4bIo9+wy1aeGf9AmDl57EzvB6urV9Kp
JS4c4O8lpjoBcVipgSFms5DzyW6rgKI41WW/EHY9NS3uHYhUbgSWXLZyzSXHm6HK
fogemlPHXS4MPbvzjwbV
=zrE0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#372800

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2016-09-25 15:45 -0700
Message-ID	<9a845e8e-ceb8-4c5f-8f75-526cf7315744@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#372796

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:31:33 PM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi owl, 
> > 
> > This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
> > 
> > - -- 
> > Marek Novotny
> > https://github.com/marek-novotny
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1
> > 
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
> > MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
> > WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
> > M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
> > QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
> > YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
> > 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
> > AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
> > Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
> > 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
> > Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
> > ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
> > =zo4t
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> Good signature.

Says the same here, too.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#372804

From	Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com>
Date	2016-09-25 22:47 +0000
Message-ID	<f6udnfKAS7qbyXXKnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to	#372800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2016-09-25, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:31:33 PM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> > 
>> > Hi owl, 
>> > 
>> > This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
>> > 
>> > - -- 
>> > Marek Novotny
>> > https://github.com/marek-novotny
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> > 
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>> > MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>> > WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>> > M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>> > QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>> > YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>> > 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>> > AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>> > Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>> > 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>> > Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>> > ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>> > =zo4t
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> Good signature.
>
> Says the same here, too.

Excellent, thanks!

- -- 
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=8anH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373178 — Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

From	John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date	2016-09-28 09:43 -0700
Subject	Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?
Message-ID	<7b2d4f59-cf57-4b96-beaa-03c178e7bef0@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#372796

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 6:31:33 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Hi owl, 
> > 
> > This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
> > 
> > - -- 
> > Marek Novotny
> > https://github.com/marek-novotny
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1
> > 
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
> > MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
> > WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
> > M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
> > QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
> > YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
> > 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
> > AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
> > Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
> > 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
> > Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
> > ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
> > =zo4t
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> Good signature.


Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl, Lagrange?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373210 — Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

From	"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date	2016-09-28 18:02 +0000
Subject	Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?
Message-ID	<hjagu0etoasg.r@perch.invalid>
In reply to	#373178

John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 6:31:33 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>> Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> > 
>> > Hi owl, 
>> > 
>> > This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
>> > 
>> > - -- 
>> > Marek Novotny
>> > https://github.com/marek-novotny
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> > Version: GnuPG v1
>> > 
>> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>> > MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>> > WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>> > M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>> > QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>> > YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>> > 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>> > AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>> > Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>> > 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>> > Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>> > ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>> > =zo4t
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> Good signature.
> 
> 
> Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl, Lagrange?

Why wouldn't I?

anon@lowtide:~$ gpg --list-secret-keys
/home/anon/.gnupg/secring.gpg
-----------------------------
sec   2048R/B0984AAB 2015-04-27
uid                  owl (usenet) <owl@rooftop.invalid>
ssb   2048R/7B91B00A 2015-04-27

anon@lowtide:~$

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373274 — Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

From	Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer>
Date	2016-09-28 19:46 -0400
Subject	Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?
Message-ID	<11to5i5tsx6v4.dlg@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org>
In reply to	#373178

John Gohde wrote:

> Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl, Lagrange?

Because he *is* Owl, you chowderhead.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373275 — Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

From	John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com>
Date	2016-09-28 17:14 -0700
Subject	Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?
Message-ID	<db799d20-fb59-4b32-b889-b465f5e7f50e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#373274

On Wednesday, September 28, 2016 at 7:46:48 PM UTC-4, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> John Gohde wrote:
> 
> > Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl, Lagrange?
> 
> Because he *is* Owl, you chowderhead.



You mean Snit Junior, don't you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373007

From	"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date	2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
Message-ID	<hjasgue03.g@perch.invalid>
In reply to	#372794

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 9/25/16, 3:25 PM, in article
> hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny"
> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Hi owl, 
>> 
>> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro.
>> 
>> - -- 
>> Marek Novotny
>> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>> 
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>> =zo4t
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
> 

Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
any of this works, and left it at that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373010

From	Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org>
Date	2016-09-27 19:02 +0000
Message-ID	<e4vu23Fd2baU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#373007

On 2016-09-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 9/25/16, 3:25 PM, in article
>> hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny"
>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Hi owl, 
>>> 
>>> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro.
>>> 
>>> - -- 
>>> Marek Novotny
>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>> 
>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>>> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>>> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>>> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>>> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>>> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>>> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>>> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>>> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>>> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>>> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>>> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>>> =zo4t
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
>> 
>
> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
> any of this works, and left it at that.
>
It's a thread in COLA. Is there a single thread that the clown snit 
doesn't contaminate?

Oh yes, there is one.
The one where that person keeps posting open jobs.
Snit would never post in that thread because it involves WORK. Something 
Michael Glasser has an aversion to.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373012

From	"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date	2016-09-27 19:10 +0000
Message-ID	<ahjdgu00b3.auo@perch.invalid>
In reply to	#373010

Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> On 2016-09-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>>> 
>>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
>>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
>>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
>>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
>>> 
>>
>> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
>> any of this works, and left it at that.
>>
> It's a thread in COLA. Is there a single thread that the clown snit 
> doesn't contaminate?
> 
> Oh yes, there is one.
> The one where that person keeps posting open jobs.
> Snit would never post in that thread because it involves WORK. Something 
> Michael Glasser has an aversion to.
> 

http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373027

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2016-09-27 12:32 -0700
Message-ID	<D410175F.7E9F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to	#373012

On 9/27/16, 12:10 PM, in article ahjdgu00b3.auo@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>> On 2016-09-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> 
>>>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
>>>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a
>>>> post
>>>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
>>>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
>>> any of this works, and left it at that.
>>> 
>> It's a thread in COLA. Is there a single thread that the clown snit
>> doesn't contaminate?
>> 
>> Oh yes, there is one.
>> The one where that person keeps posting open jobs.
>> Snit would never post in that thread because it involves WORK. Something
>> Michael Glasser has an aversion to.
>> 
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv
> 
> 
<https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373030

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2016-09-27 12:46 -0700
Message-ID	<74baac43-2293-4fa2-b539-adc1d57cfac2@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#373012

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 1:10:49 PM UTC-6, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> > On 2016-09-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
> >>> 
> >>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
> >>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
> >>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
> >>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
> >>> 
> >>
> >> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
> >> any of this works, and left it at that.
> >>
> > It's a thread in COLA. Is there a single thread that the clown snit 
> > doesn't contaminate?
> > 
> > Oh yes, there is one.
> > The one where that person keeps posting open jobs.
> > Snit would never post in that thread because it involves WORK. Something 
> > Michael Glasser has an aversion to.
> > 
> 
> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv

I liked that one ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373028

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2016-09-27 12:33 -0700
Message-ID	<D4101788.7E9F9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to	#373010

On 9/27/16, 12:02 PM, in article e4vu23Fd2baU4@mid.individual.net, "Jim
Polaski" <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On 2016-09-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/25/16, 3:25 PM, in article
>>> hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny"
>>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> Hi owl, 
>>>> 
>>>> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro.
>>>> 
>>>> - -- 
>>>> Marek Novotny
>>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>> 
>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>>>> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>>>> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>>>> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>>>> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>>>> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>>>> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>>>> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>>>> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>>>> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>>>> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>>>> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>>>> =zo4t
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> 
>>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
>>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
>>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
>>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
>>> 
>> 
>> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
>> any of this works, and left it at that.
>> 
> It's a thread in COLA. Is there a single thread that the clown snit
> doesn't contaminate?
> 
> Oh yes, there is one.
> The one where that person keeps posting open jobs.
> Snit would never post in that thread because it involves WORK. Something
> Michael Glasser has an aversion to.
> 

I am NOT your personal William Shatner: <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#373024

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2016-09-27 12:01 -0700
Message-ID	<D410100B.7E9E8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to	#373007

On 9/27/16, 11:57 AM, in article hjasgue03.g@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 9/25/16, 3:25 PM, in article
>> hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny"
>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> 
>>> Hi owl, 
>>> 
>>> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro.
>>> 
>>> - -- 
>>> Marek Novotny
>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>> 
>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>>> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>>> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>>> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>>> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>>> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>>> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>>> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>>> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>>> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>>> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>>> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>>> =zo4t
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> 
>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
>> 
> 
> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
> any of this works, and left it at that.
> 
By all means do explain where you think I went wrong! I would love to hear
your thoughts on it.

I am going to guess you are simply trolling me over how you screwed up on
the "script's window" nonsense you pushed, but, hey, feel free to prove me
wrong.

And, unlike you, if I am wrong I will happily admit to it.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

csiph-web

owl - please test

Contents

#372794 — owl - please test

#372796

#372799

#372803

#372807

#372810

#372800

#372804

#373178 — Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

#373210 — Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

#373274 — Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

#373275 — Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl?

#373007

#373010

#373012

#373027

#373030

#373028

#373024