Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372803

Re: owl - please test

Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date 2016-09-25 15:47 -0700
References <hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> <oad.g0utas8@perch.invalid> <f6udnfCAS7r2znXKnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Message-ID <87342db7-bebb-46e3-aba2-69e7ee306e9e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: owl - please test
From Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 4:45:07 PM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 2016-09-25, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> > Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >> 
> >> Hi owl, 
> >> 
> >> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro. 
> >> 
> >> - -- 
> >> Marek Novotny
> >> https://github.com/marek-novotny
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v1
> >> 
> >> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
> >> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
> >> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
> >> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
> >> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
> >> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
> >> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
> >> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
> >> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
> >> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
> >> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
> >> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
> >> =zo4t
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > Good signature.
> 
> Okay, would you mind signing a post back to me so I can test they other
> half of this which is my being able to verify you via slrn as well.
> 
> Thanks for doing this by the way. Getting there. 
> 
> - -- 
> Marek Novotny
> https://github.com/marek-novotny
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6FNrAAoJEC9nkebvym+hLj0QAJeVnLes5O5rbrykiQXw6fP0
> 3tF3pcYsPeNw9bf19CT+93x7Txqk9tg90y5D5JZxS++amOIL5tE62tMPXfEV4Stx
> IgQiwZ1H/6qeQxnME+Gk6kFZmc1n5gwsZhGxR/Hd/Ux5qUDBKaG3hL/Q4VKesGGn
> 6uix6N5kGB2qAirazjr6nAUd9J33PzeKwGQTnedkZcQ84Av3MFRt9NwUuSk2KP+3
> Ej2iIi+KmSAKITPfsd0Hbt9RaOAlzMd+Uewjq5vnMuttMqtLRe+j2ZLEk0Rro8iW
> 3byE58/4U6vud1RvQ1iNDhQ5WCyuzeHYiX2+I0DjecOEUDkgnGDu0tzKUPL8CZ1a
> ESWM+rG1Zs4j0ul3lqfJ2tsdt9Fmxa/yt7+Ep8oh4qgFIdEJ95VaAxxjg4WSDTGL
> osHjuwII+Ey2P5VP9TuFtLuZvcPDCeNdwjyPvK1st3IxDH5g957Mv73zcpK6GH7n
> qJT+vVwpn8oXN+BSP9mba3H89SX2wBrkDPtFGmdt6fBAEDiQqJDY1iV12YUNtEOv
> wLYVrMLjMAaKtxIRF8u6rl7bvZMxfP1D11sFcvCYCyQPfSuhUNP6VbENQgmOnMAa
> uHSEpdyxfuJ8qHizYE7zYKJZxMG/8fTLx7iQ0a66jZ9MpHRBKbbtXIttI0Vabk7v
> mV7mKI/MfxIx/y+Qkg//
> =TINB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I just installed slrn, having trouble here and there ;)

I had it working, at least to read, but I broke it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=f8Gl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:25 +0000
  Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 22:31 +0000
    Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:44 +0000
      Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:47 -0700
      Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 23:06 +0000
        Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:17 +0000
    Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:45 -0700
      Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:47 +0000
    Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:43 -0700
      Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-28 18:02 +0000
      Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-28 19:46 -0400
        Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 17:14 -0700
  Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
    Re: owl - please test Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 19:02 +0000
      Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 19:10 +0000
        Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:32 -0700
        Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 12:46 -0700
      Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:33 -0700
    Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:01 -0700

csiph-web