Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373028

Re: owl - please test

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: owl - please test
Date 2016-09-27 12:33 -0700
Message-ID <D4101788.7E9F9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References <hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> <D40DAFA4.7E786%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <hjasgue03.g@perch.invalid> <e4vu23Fd2baU4@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/27/16, 12:02 PM, in article e4vu23Fd2baU4@mid.individual.net, "Jim
Polaski" <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On 2016-09-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 9/25/16, 3:25 PM, in article
>>> hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny"
>>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> Hi owl, 
>>>> 
>>>> This is a test of signing the post from within slrn with a macro.
>>>> 
>>>> - -- 
>>>> Marek Novotny
>>>> https://github.com/marek-novotny
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>> 
>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJX6E7GAAoJEC9nkebvym+hRPEP/i3t2sdxSak98YVtXkl0Ik64
>>>> MJP2VDxcHcjQtvMBD3ZYOFqfY+f4+EIwSClAfALP7L3YTpVRM3OqIvBAmfMK0kYY
>>>> WXAtN506j+fGSTgrKHRTlqJD5OCBgbYusKuSErF9CJTqSfU/7OYyjFJgagLBL7qk
>>>> M8n5wmMoHfCZoy+6fhk8x2UQBz0zfq80qntK1ymt41yZ3jXeJ0wZnEF9bOwUH5IV
>>>> QiRkwAkn0Nq42rQMnM97i3tqJLAnCafqSWxd7SoX2LzgEWjd+ZsAXU7CJ9HUm5YH
>>>> YI8sFGDVqaxjAav1qeyKGmIS6h1CfPssl3OerSpUk3WA6sQ84ZWq+h2Et1TpZQ52
>>>> 5K02bZlvAi0Ia5ZNOhvonSOlAiXXHGXAwNOy17BkKqnj/OA8K427oRRVFi//DswP
>>>> AowneAFWk7r0XVG0TetTlDTX33yYfTssO5f0wnLDEbahc3R30wBOxnx5mpaILx7A
>>>> Eq/Sphg46FsjO/WW9yXfxtpSpqVMmyFYyr2y+d1VBgsCDBl+BtbbrbhihDTk2Gfm
>>>> 3iFshl4+PQ4Ms+uRxkMk0M5GYHU83fe7bIjMfd/3XGUkhzMfYC9Dg+8tTeff/c1Z
>>>> Zq+QblRAFchSK/yA1UO/Xuy/m/ehSMX25+Qhy8z9CNxGs6vqH+mhe4gMaY8c9dbF
>>>> ZJXNCybsrZ5vGQko+vb0
>>>> =zo4t
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> 
>>> While the longer signature line is more secure, really a very short one
>>> would accomplish the point of making it very hard for anyone to forge a post
>>> AND would not clutter your posts as much. When many Usenet posts are short
>>> having such a long "security block" makes little sense.
>>> 
>> 
>> Moron.  You could have just noted that you don't have a clue how
>> any of this works, and left it at that.
>> 
> It's a thread in COLA. Is there a single thread that the clown snit
> doesn't contaminate?
> 
> Oh yes, there is one.
> The one where that person keeps posting open jobs.
> Snit would never post in that thread because it involves WORK. Something
> Michael Glasser has an aversion to.
> 

I am NOT your personal William Shatner: <https://goo.gl/ZMXDjt>


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:25 +0000
  Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 22:31 +0000
    Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:44 +0000
      Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:47 -0700
      Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 23:06 +0000
        Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:17 +0000
    Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:45 -0700
      Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:47 +0000
    Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:43 -0700
      Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-28 18:02 +0000
      Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-28 19:46 -0400
        Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 17:14 -0700
  Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
    Re: owl - please test Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 19:02 +0000
      Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 19:10 +0000
        Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:32 -0700
        Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 12:46 -0700
      Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:33 -0700
    Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:01 -0700

csiph-web