Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #372807
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: owl - please test |
| Date | 2016-09-25 23:06 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <hagiagu88.axu@perch.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <hqedneSB1IJa03XKnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@giganews.com> <oad.g0utas8@perch.invalid> <f6udnfCAS7r2znXKnZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >> >> Good signature. > > Okay, would you mind signing a post back to me so I can test they other > half of this which is my being able to verify you via slrn as well. > > Thanks for doing this by the way. Getting there. > No problem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJX6FdKAAoJEPmLqQ2wmEqr9CMH/1C0K1FxsIJ1DyU1yTFYrxVq bm24Qs41bKXbmUfa70s4gO+u4iV4iEfY62lkXik3ZHdFnI0MHo2e9lzddtIDReD+ stLf//X9iZ5rnF8vfCF6XfWvx8c73QbJ3HAljc9qPKLEsSzIBTKQQMTiIbw/s0+b M7zz2uZnEtS/XGZaWC3/4o2EIMLZoBCiHAxBmtBdzgTYYROTkW35IqwFiPEQ2N9e yk5lWHSLM98VWngpz36t3TVX71DKWzwtLYZKRHrphXE6tuH4HVMCAIv/jWGFPJGd 8Y4BT437QNHBx0fS+G0QxumjzNWRqRDGmloBAbjyC6arG6+H9xtmSPkqsNVlly4= =XVqd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:25 +0000
Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 22:31 +0000
Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:44 +0000
Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:47 -0700
Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-25 23:06 +0000
Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 23:17 +0000
Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-25 15:45 -0700
Re: owl - please test Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-25 22:47 +0000
Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 09:43 -0700
Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-28 18:02 +0000
Re: Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-28 19:46 -0400
Why are you responding to a question addressed to owl? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-09-28 17:14 -0700
Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 18:57 +0000
Re: owl - please test Jim Polaski <jpolaski@linuxmail.org> - 2016-09-27 19:02 +0000
Re: owl - please test "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-27 19:10 +0000
Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:32 -0700
Re: owl - please test Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-27 12:46 -0700
Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:33 -0700
Re: owl - please test Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-09-27 12:01 -0700
csiph-web