Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #350189 > unrolled thread

[Meta] Another modest proposal

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 01:41 +0000
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 21:47 -0400
      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:27 -0400
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 19:03 -0700
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 02:19 +0000
      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 02:37 +0000
        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 02:42 +0000
          Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 02:54 +0000
            Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:01 +0000
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:05 -0400
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:06 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:07 -0400
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:18 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:15 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:20 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:32 +0000
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:28 -0700
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Silver Slimer <ahlstrom's_manhood@void.ca> - 2016-04-16 11:05 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-19 21:46 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-19 17:05 -0700
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 20:42 -0400
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:06 +0000
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:12 +0000
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:32 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:41 +0000
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-16 10:33 -0700
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:46 -0700
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:36 -0700
            Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:03 -0400
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:06 -0400
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:08 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-15 23:19 -0400
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:24 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:43 +0000
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal buzzard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-15 23:10 -0400
              Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:16 +0000
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 23:23 -0400
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 03:48 +0000
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 00:04 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 04:15 +0000
                  Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-15 23:48 -0700
                    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal buzzard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:06 -0400
                      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-16 00:19 -0700
                        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal buzzard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-16 03:26 -0400
                        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:06 -0400
                Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 08:14 -0500
            Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-16 09:41 +0000
        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 22:48 -0400
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Ron House <rhouse@smartchat.net.au> - 2016-04-16 15:35 +1000
      Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 15:26 +0000
        Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 11:35 -0400
    Re: [Meta] Another modest proposal John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 07:09 -0700

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#350912

Siri Cruise wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In article <nf68ur$eb1$28@dont-email.me>, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> 
> wrote:
>
> That we eat Microsoft programmers to reduce the glut of broken software?

<chuckle>  Swift!

-- 
Living your life is a task so difficult, it has never been attempted before.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350227

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000, owl wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>> 
>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big
>>>>>> 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>> trolls. Ha!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>> 
>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>> 
>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>> kookishness.
>> 
>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>> 
>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening
>> a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>> could be had one way or the other.
>> 
>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>> 
>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>> threats.
>> 
>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>> sleeve.
>  
> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west that
> than any alt.* group.

An argument from incredulity?  I don't believe it.

> Besides, without the trolls it would be boring. 

It would be for starters, because nobody wants to come here.  _That is 
the trolls' goal._  Do you see?

> Can you imagine this group without John Gohde?  The place was dying, and
> he rode in on his donkey just in time.

Well, you could argue that John is on-topic, in that he is definitely 
posting advocacy for Linux.

(Sad, misguided advocacy, but advocacy nonetheless. ;)

-- 
Won a Checky(tm) on 2016-04-15
 ...for SCHOOLING a KOOK about DERIVATIVES.
(Including working through a sample problem.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350231

In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big
>>>>>>> 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>>> trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>> 
>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>> kookishness.
>>> 
>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>> 
>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening
>>> a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>> 
>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>> 
>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>> threats.
>>> 
>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>> sleeve.
>>  
>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west that
>> than any alt.* group.
> 
> An argument from incredulity?  I don't believe it.
> 

JHC, are there more logical fallacies than disorders in Snit's DSM?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350239

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:12:05 +0000, owl wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000, owl wrote:
>> 
>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>> big 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll
>>>>>>>> the trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
>>>>> was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
>>>>> changed?
>>>> 
>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>> kookishness.
>>>> 
>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>> 
>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>> opening a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious
>>>> argument could be had one way or the other.
>>>> 
>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>> 
>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>> threats.
>>>> 
>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>> sleeve.
>>>  
>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>> that than any alt.* group.
>> 
>> An argument from incredulity?  I don't believe it.
>> 
>> 
> JHC, are there more logical fallacies than disorders in Snit's DSM?

If I understand the question, then I'd say no.  (Snit's DSM?  You mean 
_the_ DSM V?  Or Snit's diagnoses? Or...?)

Old logic faq:

http://pastebin.com/yLTAMwP4

Newer faq:

http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html


There's a lot of them, and that doesn't even identify them all.

A common place for the argument from incredulity is creationism, where 
someone refuses to accept that evolution can make sense, no matter how 
much evidence is given them.  They don't get a sense of the timescales 
involved, so they don't believe it can happen.

-- 
Won a Checky(tm) on 2016-04-15
 ...for schooling a kook about derivatives.
(Including working through a sample problem.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350241

In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:12:05 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000, owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>>> big 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll
>>>>>>>>> the trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
>>>>>> was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
>>>>>> changed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>>> opening a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious
>>>>> argument could be had one way or the other.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>> threats.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>  
>>>> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west
>>>> that than any alt.* group.
>>> 
>>> An argument from incredulity?  I don't believe it.
>>> 
>>> 
>> JHC, are there more logical fallacies than disorders in Snit's DSM?
> 
> If I understand the question, then I'd say no.  (Snit's DSM?  You mean 
> _the_ DSM V?  Or Snit's diagnoses? Or...?)
> 

Snit's DSM:
http://i.imgur.com/zNTAFvL.png

> Old logic faq:
> 
> http://pastebin.com/yLTAMwP4
> 
> Newer faq:
> 
> http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html
> 
> 
> There's a lot of them, and that doesn't even identify them all.
> 
> A common place for the argument from incredulity is creationism, where 
> someone refuses to accept that evolution can make sense, no matter how 
> much evidence is given them.  They don't get a sense of the timescales 
> involved, so they don't believe it can happen.
> 

I took a logic class once, and the professor had a rule that if you made
an A on the exam you automatically got an A on the next exam, so I only
had to take the one.  I loved logic.  But that was then, and this is now.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350351

On 4/15/16, 8:41 PM, in article ghjbnmvf9.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>> A common place for the argument from incredulity is creationism, where
>> someone refuses to accept that evolution can make sense, no matter how
>> much evidence is given them.  They don't get a sense of the timescales
>> involved, so they don't believe it can happen.
>> 
> 
> I took a logic class once, and the professor had a rule that if you made
> an A on the exam you automatically got an A on the next exam, so I only
> had to take the one.  I loved logic.  But that was then, and this is now.

Now you hate logic. Clearly. :)


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350260

In article <dndq24Fddd5U14@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org 
says...


> A common place for the argument from incredulity is creationism, where 
> someone refuses to accept that evolution can make sense, no matter how 
> much evidence is given them.  They don't get a sense of the timescales 
> involved, so they don't believe it can happen.
> 

I've been trying to tell people that for... almost FOREVER!

One reason religion works for a lot of people, is we can't even conceive 
of what evolution could or couldn't do in a few billion years.  We have 
absolutely no sense of a timescale that long.  On the one hand, 
evolution makes sense because it's provable.  On the other hand, how 
many fortuitous events had to happen to create a world as complex as 
ours?  It boggles the mind.  And then... on a THIRD hand... where the 
fuck did all the stuff come from in the first place?

My cat's lucky.  She isn't cursed with pondering all this shit every 
fucking day... she just "is".

-- 
Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350259

In article <ghjdi03.arfa@rooftop.invalid>, owl@rooftop.invalid says...


> 
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 03:01:49 +0000, owl wrote:
> > 
> >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big
> >>>>>>> 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
> >>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
> >>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
> >>>>>>> trolls. Ha!
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
> >>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
> >>> 
> >>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
> >>> kookishness.
> >>> 
> >>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
> >>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
> >>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
> >>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
> >>> 
> >>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening
> >>> a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
> >>> could be had one way or the other.
> >>> 
> >>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
> >>> 
> >>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
> >>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
> >>> threats.
> >>> 
> >>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
> >>> sleeve.
> >>  
> >> But seriously, in an advocacy group?  These are far more wild-west that
> >> than any alt.* group.
> > 
> > An argument from incredulity?  I don't believe it.
> > 
> 
> JHC, are there more logical fallacies than disorders in Snit's DSM?

Vallor won a Checky (tm) today.

-- 
Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350223

On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:

> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
> 
>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big 8
>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls. 
>>>>> Ha!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>> 
>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
> 
> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of kookishness.
> 
> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more 
> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to 
> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair 
> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
> 
> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening a 
> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument 
> could be had one way or the other.
> 
> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
> 
> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll 
> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with 
> threats.
> 
> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his sleeve.

You take life too seriously Bloaty.
You need to relax.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350225

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>
>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big  
>>>>>> 8
>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.
>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>
>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>
>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of  
>> kookishness.
>>
>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more
>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to
>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>
>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening  
>> a
>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>> could be had one way or the other.
>>
>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>
>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>> threats.
>>
>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his  
>> sleeve.
>
> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
> You need to relax.

because "USENET == LIFE"... LOL

-- 
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...

2nd verse: (by: bender@the.future)

have you heard about the lotusLoser
beaten by the queen of pembroke each time
have you heard about the lotusLoser
he's a luser but he still keeps on cryin'...

-

LOL

well i guess if we went to:

http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/

and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b9634ebeb7c28503997@dizum.com>

<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>

I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."

it would say "definitely not green", right???

http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png

D'OH!!!!

*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*

-

"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental  
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the  
stock market go even lower."

so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?

funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the  
government stepping in to save the stock market.

"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view  
and several heterodox points of view.

First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional  
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss  
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories  
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden  
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once  
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further  
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became  
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever  
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.

Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression  
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by  
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking  
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,  
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this  
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow  
to owe ever more in real terms."

wait?  what?  no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the  
government for everything mentioned?

odd, that.  eh, lotusLoser?

-

the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350229

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:06:04 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big  
>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a course
>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the trolls.
>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>>
>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of  
>>> kookishness.
>>>
>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and more
>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard to
>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped pair
>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>
>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening  
>>> a
>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>
>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>
>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>> threats.
>>>
>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his  
>>> sleeve.
>>
>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>> You need to relax.
> 
> because "USENET == LIFE"... LOL

You are right.
In COLA Linux = LIFE.
A sad LIFE, but LIFE just the same.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350235

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:08:30 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:06:04 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take  
>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a  
>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the  
>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things  
>>>>> changed?
>>>>
>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>> kookishness.
>>>>
>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and  
>>>> more
>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard  
>>>> to
>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped  
>>>> pair
>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>
>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about  
>>>> opening
>>>> a
>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>
>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>
>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>> threats.
>>>>
>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>> sleeve.
>>>
>>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>>> You need to relax.
>>
>> because "USENET == LIFE"... LOL
>
> You are right.
> In COLA Linux = LIFE.
> A sad LIFE, but LIFE just the same.

it's no BeOS.

-- 
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...

2nd verse: (by: bender@the.future)

have you heard about the lotusLoser
beaten by the queen of pembroke each time
have you heard about the lotusLoser
he's a luser but he still keeps on cryin'...

-

LOL

well i guess if we went to:

http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/color-summarizer/

and gave it the URL to the image THAT YOU POSTED IN POST:
<617072d3bd042b9634ebeb7c28503997@dizum.com>

<http://i.imgur.com/gchDiBs.png>

I took that on my way to eat lunch. I tried to make an index card with
backward writing so the SPANKY-SPANKY! reflection would show up with
frontward writing, but apparently I can't write backward legibly, so
you gets what you gets."

it would say "definitely not green", right???

http://i.imgur.com/1CkNIDC.png

D'OH!!!!

*SPNAKITY-SPNAKITY*

-

"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental  
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the  
stock market go even lower."

so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?

funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the  
government stepping in to save the stock market.

"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view  
and several heterodox points of view.

First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional  
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss  
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories  
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden  
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once  
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further  
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became  
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever  
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.

Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression  
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by  
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking  
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,  
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this  
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow  
to owe ever more in real terms."

wait?  what?  no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the  
government for everything mentioned?

odd, that.  eh, lotusLoser?

-

the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png

-

"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350238

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:19:15 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:08:30 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:06:04 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take  
>>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a  
>>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the  
>>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things  
>>>>>> changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and  
>>>>> more
>>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard  
>>>>> to
>>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped  
>>>>> pair
>>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>>
>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about  
>>>>> opening
>>>>> a
>>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>> threats.
>>>>>
>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>
>>>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>>>> You need to relax.
>>>
>>> because "USENET == LIFE"... LOL
>>
>> You are right.
>> In COLA Linux = LIFE.
>> A sad LIFE, but LIFE just the same.
> 
> it's no BeOS.

BeOS was way ahead of it's time.
Sad it didn't make it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350242

In comp.os.linux.advocacy Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:19:15 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:08:30 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:06:04 -0400, root@127.0.0.1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>  
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take  
>>>>>>>>>> big
>>>>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>>>>> group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a  
>>>>>>>>>> course
>>>>>>>>>> of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the  
>>>>>>>>>> trolls.
>>>>>>>>>> Ha!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things  
>>>>>>> changed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and  
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in regard  
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly 'shopped  
>>>>>> pair
>>>>>> of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about  
>>>>>> opening
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>>>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>>> threats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>>
>>>>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>>>>> You need to relax.
>>>>
>>>> because "USENET == LIFE"... LOL
>>>
>>> You are right.
>>> In COLA Linux = LIFE.
>>> A sad LIFE, but LIFE just the same.
>> 
>> it's no BeOS.
> 
> BeOS was way ahead of it's time.
> Sad it didn't make it.

It didn't make it with me because it never went multiuser before I lost
interest. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350230

On 4/15/2016 11:03 PM, Omar wrote:
<...>
> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
> You need to relax.
>
Sig worthy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350233

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar wrote:

> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>> 
>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big
>>>>>> 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>> trolls. Ha!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>> 
>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>> 
>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>> kookishness.
>> 
>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>> 
>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening
>> a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>> could be had one way or the other.
>> 
>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>> 
>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>> threats.
>> 
>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>> sleeve.
> 
> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
> You need to relax.

I am relaxed.  I've been having a pleasant evening gardening.

You, on the other hand, were just faced with your life being turned 
upside-down.

How will you get your "fix" if you can't troll COLA anymore?

-- 
Won a Checky(tm) on 2016-04-15
 ...for schooling a kook about derivatives.
(Including working through a sample problem.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350237

On 16 Apr 2016 03:16:51 GMT, vallor wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar wrote:
> 
>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>> 
>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take big
>>>>>>> 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll the
>>>>>>> trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it was
>>>> always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things changed?
>>> 
>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>> kookishness.
>>> 
>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>> 
>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about opening
>>> a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious argument
>>> could be had one way or the other.
>>> 
>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>> 
>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>> threats.
>>> 
>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>> sleeve.
>> 
>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>> You need to relax.
> 
> I am relaxed.  I've been having a pleasant evening gardening.

Your posts don't indicate that.
 
> You, on the other hand, were just faced with your life being turned 
> upside-down.

lol.
You overestimate your capabilities and you grossly underestimate the
power of social media when it comes down to focusing on corporations.
 
> How will you get your "fix" if you can't troll COLA anymore?

Again, the power of the press.

Fact is you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with
alt.usenet.kooks which is why you started the xposts there.

Odd behavior for sure, but then so is an obsession with Star Wars.
Right OB_Bloaty_One?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350243

On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:23:23 -0400, Omar wrote:

> On 16 Apr 2016 03:16:51 GMT, vallor wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar wrote:
>> 
>>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>> big 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll
>>>>>>>> the trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
>>>>> was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
>>>>> changed?
>>>> 
>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>> kookishness.
>>>> 
>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>> 
>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>> opening a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious
>>>> argument could be had one way or the other.
>>>> 
>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>> 
>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>> threats.
>>>> 
>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>> sleeve.
>>> 
>>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>>> You need to relax.
>> 
>> I am relaxed.  I've been having a pleasant evening gardening.
> 
> Your posts don't indicate that.

Your opinion of my posts is irrelevant.

>  
>> You, on the other hand, were just faced with your life being turned
>> upside-down.
> 
> lol.
> You overestimate your capabilities and you grossly underestimate the
> power of social media when it comes down to focusing on corporations.

Yes, your bully cause will go viral!  Occupy will march!

Look:  this is obvious psychological projection. Take a look in the 
mirror -- who is going to listen to you, a USENET crank?  You get your 
thrills from posting trolls to a tiny, tiny newsgroup!  If you were 
actually capable of making any kind of difference, wouldn't you have 
moved on over the last 20 years?  Go save the dolphins or something.

>  
>> How will you get your "fix" if you can't troll COLA anymore?
> 
> Again, the power of the press.

I will admit that the Net's end-run around legacy media gives us all a 
much better way to speak truth to power.  But _you_ wouldn't be telling 
the truth, would you?  What would that make you?  What happens when you 
speak lies to power, hmmmm?


> 
> Fact is you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with
> alt.usenet.kooks which is why you started the xposts there.

Fact is, you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with 
comp.os.linux.advocacy, which is why you've been posting there for two 
decades.  Meanwhile, I'm pointing out you crazed kooks to the good people 
of auk, because that's how its done on the USENET.  You don't like it?  
Go make your own network.

> 
> Odd behavior for sure, but then so is an obsession with Star Wars. Right
> OB_Bloaty_One?

Your star wars fanfic is curious, but ineffective -- it's you that keeps 
referencing it, not me.  If this is another example of psychological 
projection, then I'm wondering how long before you start hearing voices.

Now run along before FNVHe takes an interest in you.  I don't think 
someone in your fragile state would survive that, lol.

-- 
Won a Checky(tm) on 2016-04-15
 ...for schooling a kook about derivatives.
(Including working through a sample problem.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350244

On 16 Apr 2016 03:48:47 GMT, vallor wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:23:23 -0400, Omar wrote:
> 
>> On 16 Apr 2016 03:16:51 GMT, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>>> big 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group charter.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group went
>>>>>>>>> full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll
>>>>>>>>> the trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
>>>>>> was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
>>>>>> changed?
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>>> opening a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A serious
>>>>> argument could be had one way or the other.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery, you'll
>>>>> find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group responded with
>>>>> threats.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>> sleeve.
>>>> 
>>>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>>>> You need to relax.
>>> 
>>> I am relaxed.  I've been having a pleasant evening gardening.
>> 
>> Your posts don't indicate that.
> 
> Your opinion of my posts is irrelevant.

It's as relevant as your opinion of me.
 
>>  
>>> You, on the other hand, were just faced with your life being turned
>>> upside-down.
>> 
>> lol.
>> You overestimate your capabilities and you grossly underestimate the
>> power of social media when it comes down to focusing on corporations.
> 
> Yes, your bully cause will go viral!  Occupy will march!

I hope not!
 
> Look:  this is obvious psychological projection. Take a look in the 
> mirror -- who is going to listen to you, a USENET crank?  You get your 
> thrills from posting trolls to a tiny, tiny newsgroup!  If you were 
> actually capable of making any kind of difference, wouldn't you have 
> moved on over the last 20 years?  Go save the dolphins or something.

1. You have me confused with someone else.
2. See 1 because I haven't been here for anywhere near 20 years.
3. My mimicking of another posters style has worked. See 1.
4. The dolphins don't need me to save them. 
>  
>>> How will you get your "fix" if you can't troll COLA anymore?
>> 
>> Again, the power of the press.
> 
> I will admit that the Net's end-run around legacy media gives us all a 
> much better way to speak truth to power.  But _you_ wouldn't be telling 
> the truth, would you?  What would that make you?  What happens when you 
> speak lies to power, hmmmm?

Ask a politician. They do it every day.
Answer is, it depends on whether the media wishes to believe whatever
a person is saying.
 
>> 
>> Fact is you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with
>> alt.usenet.kooks which is why you started the xposts there.
> 
> Fact is, you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with 
> comp.os.linux.advocacy, which is why you've been posting there for two 
> decades.  Meanwhile, I'm pointing out you crazed kooks to the good people 
> of auk, because that's how its done on the USENET.  You don't like it?  
> Go make your own network.


You have the wrong person.
However, you seem obsessed with AUK and seeing as you seem to be one
yourself that is understandable.
 
>> 
>> Odd behavior for sure, but then so is an obsession with Star Wars. Right
>> OB_Bloaty_One?
> 
> Your star wars fanfic is curious, but ineffective -- it's you that keeps 
> referencing it, not me.  If this is another example of psychological 
> projection, then I'm wondering how long before you start hearing voices.

I'm not the one making OBLinux posts.
That's you.
I'm simply pointing it out.
It's weird.
 
> Now run along before FNVHe takes an interest in you.  I don't think 
> someone in your fragile state would survive that, lol.

Been there and done that.
It was a draw.

Go have another doughnut.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350247

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 00:04:04 -0400, Omar wrote:

> On 16 Apr 2016 03:48:47 GMT, vallor wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:23:23 -0400, Omar wrote:
>> 
>>> On 16 Apr 2016 03:16:51 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:03:27 -0400, Omar wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 16 Apr 2016 02:54:10 GMT, vallor wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:42:02 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 02:19:48 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> You know, this _is_ a "big 8" newsgroup.  Some news admins take
>>>>>>>>>> big 8 group charters more seriously than an alt.* group
>>>>>>>>>> charter.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> What would happen if folks who wanted to clean up the group
>>>>>>>>>> went full-on netcop on the troll's kkkreepy asses?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I suspect there is not the political will to commit to such a
>>>>>>>>>> course of action, but thought I'd bring it up, if only to troll
>>>>>>>>>> the trolls. Ha!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Are you trying for kook of the month yourself?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I don't follow, please explain yourself.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Well, I haven't looked at AUK in about 15 years, but back then it
>>>>>>> was always one netcop or another getting the awards.  Have things
>>>>>>> changed?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> There is some of that, but there also has to be an element of
>>>>>> kookishness.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Like Wollmann.  He was always netkkkopping...and would get more and
>>>>>> more frustrated when people didn't take him seriously.  Once was in
>>>>>> regard to the famous "pantihed" banner ad, with him wearing a badly
>>>>>> 'shopped pair of panties on his head.  Ah, memories.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But no, I don't think there's anything particularly kooky about
>>>>>> opening a discussion of enforcing a big-8 group's charter.  A
>>>>>> serious argument could be had one way or the other.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But if it were an alt.* group, that would probably be cuckoo.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Finally, I'll point out that vv down there vv in the snubbery,
>>>>>> you'll find one of the longest-standing trolls in the group
>>>>>> responded with threats.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Must've put the fear of God in him -- and he wears his fear on his
>>>>>> sleeve.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You take life too seriously Bloaty.
>>>>> You need to relax.
>>>> 
>>>> I am relaxed.  I've been having a pleasant evening gardening.
>>> 
>>> Your posts don't indicate that.
>> 
>> Your opinion of my posts is irrelevant.
> 
> It's as relevant as your opinion of me.

If you keep telling yourself that, you might believe it.

>  
>  
>>>> You, on the other hand, were just faced with your life being turned
>>>> upside-down.
>>> 
>>> lol.
>>> You overestimate your capabilities and you grossly underestimate the
>>> power of social media when it comes down to focusing on corporations.
>> 
>> Yes, your bully cause will go viral!  Occupy will march!
> 
> I hope not!
>  
>> Look:  this is obvious psychological projection. Take a look in the
>> mirror -- who is going to listen to you, a USENET crank?  You get your
>> thrills from posting trolls to a tiny, tiny newsgroup!  If you were
>> actually capable of making any kind of difference, wouldn't you have
>> moved on over the last 20 years?  Go save the dolphins or something.
> 
> 1. You have me confused with someone else.

Sure, sure.


> 2. See 1 because I haven't been here for anywhere near 20 years.

Uh-huh.


> 3. My mimicking of another posters style has worked. See 1.

So you just _pretend_ to be the guy obsessed with COLA by _acting_ like 
the guy obsessed with COLA and _being_ obsessed with COLA.

How do we differentiate between what you appear to be and what you are?  
They are the same thing:  obsessed and fixated.

> 4. The dolphins don't need me to save them.

"or something".  Comprehension isn't your strong suit?

>>  
>>>> How will you get your "fix" if you can't troll COLA anymore?
>>> 
>>> Again, the power of the press.
>> 
>> I will admit that the Net's end-run around legacy media gives us all a
>> much better way to speak truth to power.  But _you_ wouldn't be telling
>> the truth, would you?  What would that make you?  What happens when you
>> speak lies to power, hmmmm?
> 
> Ask a politician. They do it every day.

No, that would be the "power".  We're talking about the "truth" -- which 
you would not have, being a purveyor of lies.

> Answer is, it depends on whether the media wishes to believe whatever a
> person is saying.

You have a very naive idea about how "the media" works.

>  
>  
>>> Fact is you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with
>>> alt.usenet.kooks which is why you started the xposts there.
>> 
>> Fact is, you are a kook who, for some odd reason, is obsessed with
>> comp.os.linux.advocacy, which is why you've been posting there for two
>> decades.  Meanwhile, I'm pointing out you crazed kooks to the good
>> people of auk, because that's how its done on the USENET.  You don't
>> like it? Go make your own network.
> 
> 
> You have the wrong person.
> However, you seem obsessed with AUK and seeing as you seem to be one
> yourself that is understandable.

I agree that I am the one myself that is understandable.  First sensible 
thing you've said all night.

>  
>  
>>> Odd behavior for sure, but then so is an obsession with Star Wars.
>>> Right OB_Bloaty_One?
>> 
>> Your star wars fanfic is curious, but ineffective -- it's you that
>> keeps referencing it, not me.  If this is another example of
>> psychological projection, then I'm wondering how long before you start
>> hearing voices.
> 
> I'm not the one making OBLinux posts.
> That's you.
> I'm simply pointing it out.
> It's weird.

HarHar.

In other newsgroups, in the days of USENET yore, it was once the custom 
to add a "obligatory" paragraph to keep an post on-topic.  They are 
labeled "Ob(topic)" and pertain to the newsgroup's topic -- in this case, 
Linux.

Though I've explained this multiple times, you clearly haven't been 
paying attention in class.  Consider yourself properly schooled, and try 
not to be the class clown about it.


>  
>> Now run along before FNVHe takes an interest in you.  I don't think
>> someone in your fragile state would survive that, lol.
> 
> Been there and done that.
> It was a draw.

Sure, sure.

> 
> Go have another doughnut.

I don't eat donuts.  I eat healthy.

Now you can go die in a fire, and die knowing your life has been 
worthless.

-- 
Won a Checky(tm) on 2016-04-15
 ...for schooling a kook about derivatives.
(Including working through a sample problem.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web