Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343474 > unrolled thread

Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks.

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks. Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers.org> - 2016-02-13 16:35 +0000
    More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 13:22 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 18:36 +0000
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 19:45 +0100
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 14:09 -0500
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-13 20:50 +0100
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:10 +0000
                Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-13 22:44 +0000
                  Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar) Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:53 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:14 +0000
              Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:19 -0500
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:04 -0800
                  Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:54 -0500
                  Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-16 21:47 +0000
                    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:32 +0000
                    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 19:41 -0500
                      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:47 +0000
                        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-02-16 20:02 -0500
                          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-17 09:41 -0500
                    Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 21:24 -0500
                      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 02:33 +0000
                Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 00:26 +0000
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-13 16:50 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> - 2016-02-13 22:12 +0000
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-13 18:21 -0500
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:07 -0600
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-14 15:38 +0100
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:01 -0500
            Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 12:39 -0500
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 10:13 -0500
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-14 12:03 -0500
      Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz kubuntuking@gmail.com - 2016-02-15 06:01 -0800
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Delgato" <delgato@gmail.com> - 2016-02-15 16:05 +0100
          Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz "Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:39 +0100
        Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:07 -0500

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#343474 — Roy Schestowitz Makes The List Of Internet Kooks.

Another honor for Dr. Paranoia aka Roy Schestowitz

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz

"Roy Schestowitz

"David Gerard and I are discussing this over on the FB page. EVDebs (talk) 
21:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC) Edit: For reference, this is the entry I 
wrote:

Roy Schestowitz: A German academic in the UK, Schestowitz is one of the 
more prominent members of a small group of free software advocates that 
somehow manage to be more extreme than Richard Stallman himself. He started 
with the blog Boycott Novell, which became Techrights.org, and has been a 
nuisance in the FOSS community since 2006, when Novell made a (arguably 
involuntary) deal with Microsoft to avoid patent litigation.

 He portrays Microsoft as even more evil and influential than it actually 
is (quite an accomplishment even in the Nadella era), and, like any good 
tinfoil hatter, considers his favorite targets (Microsoft, Apple, Novell, 
anyone Richard Stallman hates) as beyond redemption no matter what they do 
(ie open sourcing Swift, .NET Core, etc). He has the same facility for 
anvilicious, unfunny wordplay as the FSF, not only adopting their 
terminology like "digital restrictions management", but creating a couple 
of his own (like referring to every version of Windows as "Vista XX").
Also, I left out Schestowitz' fondness for the shill gambit. EVDebs (talk) 
22:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)"

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#343486 — More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz

Why would I trust a k00k?

And it's even worse than that!

   http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383

   The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
   Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
   history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
   registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico

And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:

   RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content of
   articles at RationalWiki.

Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.

Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.

Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another 
"cut off my testicles for Linux" plant.

-- 
Q:	What happens when four WASPs find themselves in the same room?
A:	A dinner party.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343487 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:22:14 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Marly Parlorr wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/
Talk:List_of_Internet_kooks#Roy_Schestowitz
> 
> Why would I trust a k00k?
> 
> And it's even worse than that!
> 
>    http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/The-RationalWiki-Foundation/
Albuquerque-New-Mexico-87106/The-RationalWiki-Foundation-RationalWiki-
Rational-Wiki-RW-Rationalwikiorg-Rationalwi-1143383
> 
>    The RationalWiki Foundation RationalWiki, Rational-Wiki, RW,
>    Rationalwiki.org, Rationalwiki.com, Trent Toulouse A website with a
>    history of engaging in "cyber-vandalism" by its own admission, now a
>    registered nonprofit organization. Albuquerque New Mexico
> 
> And the nail in "Marly"'s coffin:
> 
>    RationalWiki is a wiki, like Wikipedia. Anyone can change the content
>    of articles at RationalWiki.
> 
> Yup.  My first instincts were correct... another plant job against Roy.
> 
> Not that he doesn't go too far in some of his thinking, in my opinion.
> 
> Anyway, I suppose we should sigh in relief that it wasn't another "cut
> off my testicles for Linux" plant.

Roy Schestowitz has been fighting for freedom, spreading the word against 
corruption and promoting GNU/Linux for many years. It's because of his 
views and willingness to take on the corrupt organizations that he is 
attacked from all fronts.

Clearly he has made many enemies with deep pockets who will stop at 
nothing in order to protect their cash cows. It is well known that 
companies like Microsoft employ mercenaries to carry out their dirty work 
and discrediting someone like Roy who dares to accurately document and 
publicize what these corrupt companies are up to.

Things like testicle removal and fake Wiki articles are spawned by these 
pay to hire soldiers of fortune.

I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now and I 
suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly being 
attacked for speaking the truth.
This thread is a prime example of that.



-- 
Dreaming About My Wall

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343489 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC)
Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:

> 
> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
> being attacked for speaking the truth.
> This thread is a prime example of that.
> 
> 
> 

This is same dizum troll I think...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343490 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC)
> Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>
>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>
> This is same dizum troll I think...

Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.

-- 
Q:	Why should you always serve a Southern Carolina football man
	soup in a plate?
A:	'Cause if you give him a bowl, he'll throw it away.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343492 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC)
> > Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
> >> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
> >> being attacked for speaking the truth.
> >> This thread is a prime example of that.  
> >
> > This is same dizum troll I think...  
> 
> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
> 

I am 99% sure that he is not serious in quote above...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343499 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:50:54 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500 Chris Ahlstrom
> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> 
>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>> > <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>> >> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>> >> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>> >> This thread is a prime example of that.
>> >
>> > This is same dizum troll I think...
>> 
>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>> 
>> 
> I am 99% sure that he is not serious in quote above...

And you would be correct as the post was satirical prose. 
Congratulations, you passed the test. 



-- 
Dreaming About My Wall

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343504 — Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar)

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:10:49 +0000, Tronald Dump wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:50:54 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500 Chris Ahlstrom
>> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> 
>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>> > <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>> >  
>>> >> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>>> >> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>>> >> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>> >> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>> >
>>> > This is same dizum troll I think...
>>> 
>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>> 
>>> 
>> I am 99% sure that he is not serious in quote above...
> 
> And you would be corre<KABOOOOOOOM>

Another poast-humper in the sin bin.

See sig for tasty Unix treat.

-- 
---- Cut Here and feed the following to sh ----

#!/bin/sh
# This is a shell archive (produced by GNU sharutils 4.14).
# To extract the files from this archive, save it to some FILE, remove
# everything before the '#!/bin/sh' line above, then type 'sh FILE'.
#
lock_dir=_sh06574
# Made on 2016-02-13 14:39 PST by <vallor@cultnix.org>.
#
# Existing files will *not* be overwritten, unless '-c' is specified.
#
# This shar contains:
# length mode       name
# ------ ---------- ------------------------------------------
#   8366 -rw------- Score
#
MD5SUM=${MD5SUM-md5sum}
f=`${MD5SUM} --version | egrep '^md5sum .*(core|text)utils'`
test -n "${f}" && md5check=true || md5check=false
${md5check} || \
  echo 'Note: not verifying md5sums.  Consider installing GNU coreutils.'
if test "X$1" = "X-c"
then keep_file=''
else keep_file=true
fi
echo=echo
save_IFS="${IFS}"
IFS="${IFS}:"
gettext_dir=
locale_dir=
set_echo=false

for dir in $PATH
do
  if test -f $dir/gettext \
     && ($dir/gettext --version >/dev/null 2>&1)
  then
    case `$dir/gettext --version 2>&1 | sed 1q` in
      *GNU*) gettext_dir=$dir
      set_echo=true
      break ;;
    esac
  fi
done

if ${set_echo}
then
  set_echo=false
  for dir in $PATH
  do
    if test -f $dir/shar \
       && ($dir/shar --print-text-domain-dir >/dev/null 2>&1)
    then
      locale_dir=`$dir/shar --print-text-domain-dir`
      set_echo=true
      break
    fi
  done

  if ${set_echo}
  then
    TEXTDOMAINDIR=$locale_dir
    export TEXTDOMAINDIR
    TEXTDOMAIN=sharutils
    export TEXTDOMAIN
    echo="$gettext_dir/gettext -s"
  fi
fi
IFS="$save_IFS"
if (echo "testing\c"; echo 1,2,3) | grep c >/dev/null
then if (echo -n test; echo 1,2,3) | grep n >/dev/null
     then shar_n= shar_c='
'
     else shar_n=-n shar_c= ; fi
else shar_n= shar_c='\c' ; fi
f=shar-touch.$$
st1=200112312359.59
st2=123123592001.59
st2tr=123123592001.5 # old SysV 14-char limit
st3=1231235901

if   touch -am -t ${st1} ${f} >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
     test ! -f ${st1} && test -f ${f}; then
  shar_touch='touch -am -t $1$2$3$4$5$6.$7 "$8"'

elif touch -am ${st2} ${f} >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
     test ! -f ${st2} && test ! -f ${st2tr} && test -f ${f}; then
  shar_touch='touch -am $3$4$5$6$1$2.$7 "$8"'

elif touch -am ${st3} ${f} >/dev/null 2>&1 && \
     test ! -f ${st3} && test -f ${f}; then
  shar_touch='touch -am $3$4$5$6$2 "$8"'

else
  shar_touch=:
  echo
  ${echo} 'WARNING: not restoring timestamps.  Consider getting and
installing GNU '\''touch'\'', distributed in GNU coreutils...'
  echo
fi
rm -f ${st1} ${st2} ${st2tr} ${st3} ${f}
#
if test ! -d ${lock_dir} ; then :
else ${echo} "lock directory ${lock_dir} exists"
     exit 1
fi
if mkdir ${lock_dir}
then ${echo} "x - created lock directory ${lock_dir}."
else ${echo} "x - failed to create lock directory ${lock_dir}."
     exit 1
fi
# ============= Score ==============
if test -n "${keep_file}" && test -f 'Score'
then
${echo} "x - SKIPPING Score (file already exists)"

else
${echo} "x - extracting Score (text)"
  sed 's/^X//' << 'SHAR_EOF' > 'Score' &&
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Mon Aug 31 15:34:54 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-500
XFrom: ^GreyCloud <cumulus@mist\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Sep  2 01:44:19 2015
X[alt.atheism]
XScore:: =-9999
XFrom: ^" _ G O D _" <DEMIGOD@SHAW\.CA>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Sep  2 13:05:54 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Sep  2 15:39:05 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-102
XFrom: ^Jack Ryan <noreply@remailer\.cpunk\.us>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Thu Sep  3 20:57:40 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =9999
XMessage-ID: ^<ms7587\$m8\$1@dont-email\.me>$
XReferences: <ms7587\$m8\$1@dont-email\.me>
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Sep  5 17:48:14 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-300
XFrom: ^DFS <nospam@dfs\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Sep  5 17:50:56 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =9999
XMessage-ID: ^<55e8fdf3\$0\$24589\$c3e8da3\$f6268168@news\.astraweb\.com>$
XReferences: <55e8fdf3\$0\$24589\$c3e8da3\$f6268168@news\.astraweb\.com>
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sun Sep  6 22:54:58 2015
X[alt.fan.art-bell]
XScore:: =-9999
XFrom: ^Raymond Karczewski <arkent3@earthlink\.net>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Thu Sep 24 12:01:48 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^"A\.M" <\.m@nsn\.s>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Sep 26 17:18:53 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^flatfish\+\+\+ <flatfish@musician\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Thu Oct  1 14:55:05 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Rob Stinchcomb <rstinchcomb6@techie\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Oct  3 08:50:37 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^GreyCloud <cumulus@mist\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Oct  3 08:58:40 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Oct  3 09:02:34 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Oct  3 16:45:41 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^onion knight <onionknight@linuxmail\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sun Oct  4 16:24:04 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^awoolmeyer@gmail\.com$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Oct 14 17:45:25 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Rhino Plastee <rhinoplastee8ball@mail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Mon Oct 19 13:38:52 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Oct 24 14:14:37 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Oct 24 14:26:21 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Charmed Tuna <\.m@nsn\.s>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Oct 27 16:19:28 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-101
XMessage-ID: ^<fe39a\.5ra@rooftop\.invalid>$
XReferences: <fe39a\.5ra@rooftop\.invalid>
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Oct 30 18:22:03 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-99
XFrom: ^Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Mon Nov  2 12:45:38 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-200
XFrom: ^John Gohde <john\.h\.gohde@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Mon Nov  2 12:48:35 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Nov  3 14:06:58 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: <\.m@nsn\.s>
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Nov  4 15:17:04 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^"Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Nov  7 01:21:37 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Nov  7 15:24:28 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^GreyCloud <mist@cumulus\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sun Nov  8 09:07:51 2015
X[alt.os.linux.ubuntu]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Dan C <youmustbejoking@lan\.invalid>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Nov 14 12:48:23 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-200
XFrom: ^Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Nov 18 13:48:23 2015
X[comp.sys.mac.system]
XScore:: =-200
XFrom: ^Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Thu Nov 19 16:30:51 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Desk Rabbit <me@example\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Nov 20 07:14:09 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Edward Stansfield <stansfield5REM6@linuxmail\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Nov 20 07:49:04 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Justin <justin@nobecauseihatespam\.edu>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Nov 21 13:33:24 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^"Drummer"<drummer@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Dec 11 09:54:28 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^Sheldon Corky <corky@engineer\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Dec 15 16:37:52 2015
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: =-100
XFrom: ^"GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Jan  9 06:40:42 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^"Henry" <henry@alpha\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Jan 12 23:57:19 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Penny Tration <fedora_the_explora@asia\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sun Jan 17 11:38:42 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^"Mandingo" <mandingo@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Jan 19 16:59:17 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Jan 22 07:04:15 2016
X[alt.usenet.kooks]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Chicken F\*cker DOW #4 <willaim\.jillians649@btinternet\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Jan 26 15:50:32 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Slimer <a\.m@unseen\.is\.invalid>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Jan 26 17:43:01 2016
X[alt.atheism]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^viva padrepio <vivapadrepio@aol\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Feb  2 01:33:31 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Marly Parl <lingdingwah@teachers\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Feb  2 01:37:46 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^"Garcia Minta" <minta@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Feb  3 15:37:56 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^anonymous <anonymous@dizum\.sewer\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Feb  3 17:27:17 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^"1 eyed chicken" <chicken@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Feb  3 17:28:28 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^"Delgato" <delgato@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Feb  9 12:56:00 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^mike antipasto <pizzadude@mycomputerrox\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Tue Feb  9 20:57:21 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^owl <owl@rooftop\.invalid>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Wed Feb 10 12:46:10 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Marly Parlor <lingdingwah@teachers\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Thu Feb 11 12:25:40 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^"KLH" <klh_man@gmail\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Feb 12 14:56:56 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Jeremy Bentham <nobody@anemone\.mooo\.com>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Fri Feb 12 14:57:57 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Jack Ryan <mixmaster@remailer\.cpunk\.us>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Feb 13 14:17:46 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Marly Parlorr <lingdingfwah@teachers\.org>$
X%EOS
X
X%BOS
X%Score created by Pan on Sat Feb 13 14:20:35 2016
X[comp.os.linux.advocacy]
XScore:: -100
XFrom: ^Tronald Dump <tronalddump@usa\.com>$
X%EOS
SHAR_EOF
  (set 20 16 02 13 14 39 08 'Score'
   eval "${shar_touch}") && \
  chmod 0600 'Score'
if test $? -ne 0
then ${echo} "restore of Score failed"
fi
  if ${md5check}
  then (
       ${MD5SUM} -c >/dev/null 2>&1 || ${echo} 'Score': 'MD5 check failed'
       ) << \SHAR_EOF
81dffb09e9f897106cdf6836897d8dde  Score
SHAR_EOF

else
test `LC_ALL=C wc -c < 'Score'` -ne 8366 && \
  ${echo} "restoration warning:  size of 'Score' is not 8366"
  fi
fi
if rm -fr ${lock_dir}
then ${echo} "x - removed lock directory ${lock_dir}."
else ${echo} "x - failed to remove lock directory ${lock_dir}."
     exit 1
fi
exit 0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343505 — Re: Boom -- another creep in the sin bin (and Score.shar)

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:44:59 +0000, vallor wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:10:49 +0000, Tronald Dump wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:50:54 +0100, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500 Chris Ahlstrom
>>> <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>> 
>>>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>> > <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>> >  
>>>> >> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times
>>>> >> now and I suggest others try to help support him because he is
>>>> >> clearly being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>>> >> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>> >
>>>> > This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>> 
>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> I am 99% sure that he is not serious in quote above...
>> 
>> And you would be corre

<KABOOOOOOOM>

KABOOOOOOOM?

What happened?

Did you explode after eating that last family size bag of potato chips 
and dip?
 
> Another poast-humper in the sin bin.

I'd put you in my "sin bin" as you call it, but it's not big enough to 
handle a whale sized idiot like you.
I'm gonna need a bigger boat, err, bin.
 
> See sig for tasty Unix treat.

That's excruciatingly boring not to mention geeky as well.
I'll bet you just knock the ladies right off their feet with those lines.

-- 
Dreaming About My Wall

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343501 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>>> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>
>> This is same dizum troll I think...
> 
> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.

Congratulations, you failed the test.
It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the courage 
to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I 
wrote.



-- 
Dreaming About My Wall

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343507 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>>>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>>>> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>
>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>> 
>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>
> Congratulations, you failed the test.
> It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the courage 
> to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I 
> wrote.

Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect
a troll's "satirical prose".

So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree or
agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?

You sound like Flounder or the Dizum Dipshit, which does not redound to
your credit, I would aver!  Hold your tongue, impious fish!

In any case, your protestations notwithstanding, it is my considered
conviction that I actually passed a detection test, albeit not the
test that you assert.  In the future, you should be cognizant of the
stipulation that any post that discusses Roy is likely to be dismissed out
of hand as the artifact of a feckless troll.

-- 
When I was younger, I could remember anything, whether it had happened
or not; but my faculties are decaying now and soon I shall be so I
cannot remember any but the things that never happened.  It is sad to
go to pieces like this but we all have to do it.
		-- Mark Twain

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343605 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> >
> >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> >> 
> >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
> >>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
> >>>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
> >>>> being attacked for speaking the truth.
> >>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
> >>>
> >>> This is same dizum troll I think...
> >> 
> >> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
> >
> > Congratulations, you failed the test.
> > It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the courage 
> > to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I 
> > wrote.
> 
> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect
> a troll's "satirical prose".
> 
> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree or
> agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?

Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?

How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.

My God. What a weenie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343615 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On 2016-02-15 9:04 AM, kubuntuking@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times now
>>>>>> and I suggest others try to help support him because he is clearly
>>>>>> being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>>>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>
>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>
>>> Congratulations, you failed the test.
>>> It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the courage
>>> to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>> wrote.
>>
>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect
>> a troll's "satirical prose".
>>
>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree or
>> agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>
> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>
> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>
> My God. What a weenie.

He wants to give the impression that Linux losers are smart people. 
Meanwhile, people like John GodHesStupid, Wideload Porkster and 7 
demonstrate that isn't the case.



-- 
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia member / IFAW, Conservative Party of Canada, Mozilla & 
PETA supporter

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343754 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:

> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> >
>> >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> >> 
>> >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>> >>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times
>> >>>> now and I suggest others try to help support him because he is
>> >>>> clearly being attacked for speaking the truth.
>> >>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>> >>>
>> >>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>> >> 
>> >> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>> >
>> > Congratulations, you failed the test.
>> > It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the
>> > courage to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree
>> > with what I wrote.
>> 
>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a troll's
>> "satirical prose".
>> 
>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree
>> or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
> 
> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your wonderfully
> silly  collection of "big words"?
> 
> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
> 
> My God. What a weenie.

Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.

How to tell it's doofus:

* Complaints about vocabulary
* "weenie"

-- 
 -v
Kernel:4.5.0-rc3-sd  Desktop:Xfce 4.12.2  Distro:Linux Mint 17.3 Rosa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343765 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
> 
>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> >> 
>>> >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>> >>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times
>>> >>>> now and I suggest others try to help support him because he is
>>> >>>> clearly being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>> >>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>> >> 
>>> >> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>> >
>>> > Congratulations, you failed the test.
>>> > It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the
>>> > courage to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree
>>> > with what I wrote.
>>> 
>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a troll's
>>> "satirical prose".
>>> 
>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree
>>> or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>> 
>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your wonderfully
>> silly  collection of "big words"?
>> 
>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>> 
>> My God. What a weenie.
> 
> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
> 
> How to tell it's doofus:
> 
> * Complaints about vocabulary

That's not Little Beaver's "vocabulary."  It's his thesaurus.

> * "weenie"
> 

Little Beaver is more of a "frankfurter."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343767 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On 2/16/2016 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>> wrote:
>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>> royalties:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several
>>>>>>> times now and I suggest others try to help support him
>>>>>>> because he is clearly being attacked for speaking the
>>>>>>> truth. This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations, you failed the test. It was satirical prose
>>>> and being weak minded you didn't have the courage to take a
>>>> stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>>> wrote.
>>>
>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a
>>> troll's "satirical prose".
>>>
>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>
>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>
>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>
>> My God. What a weenie.
>
> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.


I don't nymshift, fat man.  I've used only 'DFS' for more than 11 years.




> How to tell it's doofus:

Your 3rd chin starts jiggling?




> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"


A pretentious weenie

amanuensis, animadversion, bastinadoing, batrachian-faced, Boeotian,
befoul, bilious, blancmange, caducity, capacious, cavilling, cherish,
chrondrane, confabulate, contumely, coprolalia, coprolalic, coprophile,
de rigueur, discourse, disputatious, dotage, excrescences,
expostulations, feckless, flagitious, fomenters, forfend, fractious,
fulsome, gavage, ignominious, ineffable, intromission, jocose, jocosity,
kvell, lachrymose, lagniappe, lahar, limn, limned, litotes,
logophobia, mendacious, modicum, oeuvre, ordure, outre, paucity,
perdition, peremptory, persiflage, perspicacity, pettifogging,
philistine, plebeian, polemic, poltroon, poniarding, presbycusis,
prevarication, puissance, puissant, pulings, purblind, pustulant,
pyroclastic, querulous, ratiocination, remonstrates, rhodomontade,
rococo, sallow, Schadenfreude, schlemiel, scurrilous, sesquipedalian,
sesquipedalophobia, stercoraceous, stotting, stultiloquence, thews,
throng, timorousness, transmuted, tumescent, unctuous, uxoriousness,
wankle, Weltanschauung, writs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343769 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>>> wrote:
>>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>> royalties:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several
>>>>>>>> times now and I suggest others try to help support him
>>>>>>>> because he is clearly being attacked for speaking the
>>>>>>>> truth. This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Congratulations, you failed the test. It was satirical prose
>>>>> and being weak minded you didn't have the courage to take a
>>>>> stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>>>> wrote.
>>>>
>>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a
>>>> troll's "satirical prose".
>>>>
>>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>>
>>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>>
>>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>>
>>> My God. What a weenie.
>>
>> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
> 
> 
> I don't nymshift, fat man.  I've used only 'DFS' for more than 11 years.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> How to tell it's doofus:
> 
> Your 3rd chin starts jiggling?
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"
> 
> 
> A pretentious weenie
> 
> amanuensis, animadversion, bastinadoing, batrachian-faced, Boeotian,
> befoul, bilious, blancmange, caducity, capacious, cavilling, cherish,
> chrondrane, confabulate, contumely, coprolalia, coprolalic, coprophile,
> de rigueur, discourse, disputatious, dotage, excrescences,
> expostulations, feckless, flagitious, fomenters, forfend, fractious,
> fulsome, gavage, ignominious, ineffable, intromission, jocose, jocosity,
> kvell, lachrymose, lagniappe, lahar, limn, limned, litotes,
> logophobia, mendacious, modicum, oeuvre, ordure, outre, paucity,
> perdition, peremptory, persiflage, perspicacity, pettifogging,
> philistine, plebeian, polemic, poltroon, poniarding, presbycusis,
> prevarication, puissance, puissant, pulings, purblind, pustulant,
> pyroclastic, querulous, ratiocination, remonstrates, rhodomontade,
> rococo, sallow, Schadenfreude, schlemiel, scurrilous, sesquipedalian,
> sesquipedalophobia, stercoraceous, stotting, stultiloquence, thews,
> throng, timorousness, transmuted, tumescent, unctuous, uxoriousness,
> wankle, Weltanschauung, writs
> 

Hell, "weenie" is even in the Jargon File.

<true story>

Little Beaver, his mom, and his ball go to the playground...

Little Beaver:  "Hey you guys, Mom made some frankfurters!"
Chorus: "Get lost, douchebag."

</true story>
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343773 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

On 2/16/2016 7:47 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 2/16/2016 4:47 PM, vallor wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects
>>>>>>> royalties:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>>>>>>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several
>>>>>>>>> times now and I suggest others try to help support him
>>>>>>>>> because he is clearly being attacked for speaking the
>>>>>>>>> truth. This thread is a prime example of that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Congratulations, you failed the test. It was satirical prose
>>>>>> and being weak minded you didn't have the courage to take a
>>>>>> stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree with what I
>>>>>> wrote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a
>>>>> troll's "satirical prose".
>>>>>
>>>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or
>>>>> "disagree or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>>>>
>>>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your
>>>> wonderfully silly  collection of "big words"?
>>>>
>>>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>>>>
>>>> My God. What a weenie.
>>>
>>> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
>>
>>
>> I don't nymshift, fat man.  I've used only 'DFS' for more than 11 years.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> How to tell it's doofus:
>>
>> Your 3rd chin starts jiggling?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> * Complaints about vocabulary * "weenie"
>>
>>
>> A pretentious weenie
>>
>> amanuensis, animadversion, bastinadoing, batrachian-faced, Boeotian,
>> befoul, bilious, blancmange, caducity, capacious, cavilling, cherish,
>> chrondrane, confabulate, contumely, coprolalia, coprolalic, coprophile,
>> de rigueur, discourse, disputatious, dotage, excrescences,
>> expostulations, feckless, flagitious, fomenters, forfend, fractious,
>> fulsome, gavage, ignominious, ineffable, intromission, jocose, jocosity,
>> kvell, lachrymose, lagniappe, lahar, limn, limned, litotes,
>> logophobia, mendacious, modicum, oeuvre, ordure, outre, paucity,
>> perdition, peremptory, persiflage, perspicacity, pettifogging,
>> philistine, plebeian, polemic, poltroon, poniarding, presbycusis,
>> prevarication, puissance, puissant, pulings, purblind, pustulant,
>> pyroclastic, querulous, ratiocination, remonstrates, rhodomontade,
>> rococo, sallow, Schadenfreude, schlemiel, scurrilous, sesquipedalian,
>> sesquipedalophobia, stercoraceous, stotting, stultiloquence, thews,
>> throng, timorousness, transmuted, tumescent, unctuous, uxoriousness,
>> wankle, Weltanschauung, writs
>>
>
> Hell, "weenie" is even in the Jargon File.
>
> <true story>
>
> Little Beaver, his mom, and his ball go to the playground...
>
> Little Beaver:  "Hey you guys, Mom made some frankfurters!"
> Chorus: "Get lost, douchebag."
>
> </true story>


It happened when he was 35 years old...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343816 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

"DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in message news:na0gmc$ca3$1@dont-email.me...
> On 2/16/2016 7:47 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Hell, "weenie" is even in the Jargon File.
>>
>> <true story>
>>
>> Little Beaver, his mom, and his ball go to the playground...
>>
>> Little Beaver:  "Hey you guys, Mom made some frankfurters!"
>> Chorus: "Get lost, douchebag."
>>
>> </true story>
>
>
> It happened when he was 35 years old...
>

LOL -  http://instantrimshot.com/index.php?sound=rimshot&play=true

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#343785 — Re: More planted "information" on Roy Schestowitz

vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 06:04:07 -0800, kubuntuking wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 12:22:51 AM UTC+1, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> Tronald Dump wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:09:45 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Melzzzzz wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> >> 
>>> >>> On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:36:18 -0000 (UTC) Tronald Dump
>>> >>> <tronalddump@usa.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I've donated small amounts of money to Roy's site several times
>>> >>>> now and I suggest others try to help support him because he is
>>> >>>> clearly being attacked for speaking the truth.
>>> >>>> This thread is a prime example of that.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This is same dizum troll I think...
>>> >> 
>>> >> Could be.  Play both sides and git yer giggles either way.
>>> >
>>> > Congratulations, you failed the test.
>>> > It was satirical prose and being weak minded you didn't have the
>>> > courage to take a stand, or make a decision and disagree or agree
>>> > with what I wrote.
>>> 
>>> Awww, you're makin' me lachrymose that I failed to detect a troll's
>>> "satirical prose".
>>> 
>>> So if it is satirical, why do I have to "make a decision" or "disagree
>>> or agree" with it, or even "take a stand" about it?
>> 
>> Oh Creepy. Are you still trying to impress people with your wonderfully
>> silly  collection of "big words"?
>> 
>> How awfully embarrassing for all concerned.
>> 
>> My God. What a weenie.
>
> Aaaaand another doofus nymshift goes in the plonk bucket.
>
> How to tell it's doofus:
>
> * Complaints about vocabulary
> * "weenie"

The dolt named "Hadron" was fairly similar.  Most unappreciative of
learning!

LOL:

-- 
Q:	How was Thomas J. Watson buried?
A:	9 edge down.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web