Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349732 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-13 19:41 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-20 14:05 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 169 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OK, you experts Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-13 19:41 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-13 20:01 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-13 17:07 -0700
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 12:23 +0100
Re: OK, you experts Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-14 12:35 +0100
Re: OK, you experts "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.invalid> - 2016-04-14 11:51 +0000
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 13:16 +0100
Re: OK, you experts Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-14 13:50 +0100
Re: OK, you experts Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-14 17:41 +0200
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 17:45 +0100
Re: OK, you experts Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-04-19 10:04 +0100
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> - 2016-04-14 11:05 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 08:28 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 08:35 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-14 11:05 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-14 09:30 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 13:02 -0400
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-14 17:51 +0100
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-14 12:38 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 14:15 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-14 12:56 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-15 06:53 +0000
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-15 10:09 +0100
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 08:12 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-15 19:57 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 17:19 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-15 19:44 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-15 12:49 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-15 14:35 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 18:28 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 00:10 +0000
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-15 18:46 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 21:50 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 02:30 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 22:58 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 06:52 -0400
Re: OK, you experts William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-16 13:30 +0100
OK, you coo coo trolls Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 08:42 -0400
Re: OK, you coo coo trolls Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:07 -0400
Re: OK, you coo coo trolls William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-16 14:23 +0100
Re: OK, you coo coo trolls Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:31 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 08:59 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 08:57 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 15:34 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 13:32 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-16 11:09 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:27 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 08:51 -0500
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 10:43 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-18 11:10 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-16 13:57 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-16 14:13 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-16 16:30 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-16 19:45 -0700
Re: OK, you experts ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 04:04 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-17 09:11 -0400
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-17 06:49 -0700
Re: I don't use Ubuntu, so I don't care. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-17 18:23 -0700
Re: Is every Microsoft server now a Linux server too ? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 04:25 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 14:39 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-04-18 19:52 -0400
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-17 06:28 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 13:00 -0500
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 12:00 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 02:30 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:58 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 04:08 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 08:35 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:06 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 10:03 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 07:25 -0700
re: OK, you experts "Henry" <henry@alpha.org> - 2016-04-20 14:20 +0200
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-19 04:10 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 04:38 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 08:37 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:08 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 08:43 -0500
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 09:47 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-19 09:13 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-19 09:55 -0700
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 13:10 -0500
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-20 08:55 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-20 10:01 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-21 08:29 -0300
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-21 06:54 -0500
Re: OK, you experts owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-21 14:18 +0000
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 11:16 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 12:12 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-22 08:32 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 04:59 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-22 07:11 -0700
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-22 07:41 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 08:41 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-23 06:35 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 13:39 -0300
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-24 04:48 -0700
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-26 08:26 -0300
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-25 09:59 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-26 08:25 -0300
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-22 10:08 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 08:35 -0300
re: OK, you experts "KLH" <klh_man@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 16:30 +0200
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0300
Re: OK, you experts ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 17:10 +0000
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-21 12:13 -0400
Re: OK, you experts sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-04-22 08:40 -0300
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:09 -0400
re: OK, you experts "KLH" <klh_man@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 17:47 +0200
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-19 12:08 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 08:05 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 06:13 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-19 09:16 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 10:04 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 16:20 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 09:05 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 07:32 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 13:35 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 12:07 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-17 09:24 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 14:10 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 15:03 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 12:18 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 09:24 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:42 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 18:23 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:43 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 05:45 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 10:07 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 06:28 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 13:20 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 11:27 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 17:37 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 14:28 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:52 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 11:29 -0400
Re: OK, you experts -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-04-18 10:14 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 17:42 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 14:29 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-18 13:42 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 15:56 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:45 +0000
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-19 08:14 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 08:59 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:51 -0400
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-19 19:11 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 09:32 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:44 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-18 17:51 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 10:49 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-18 08:05 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 14:34 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 09:00 +0000
Re: OK, you experts JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-04-14 16:41 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-13 21:01 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 21:14 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-14 08:35 +0000
Re: OK, you experts John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 04:03 -0700
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-14 13:03 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 02:25 -0700
Re: OK, you experts vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-15 06:56 +0000
Re: OK, you experts Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-15 01:14 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-15 05:54 -0400
Re: OK, you experts chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-15 07:00 -0500
Re: OK, you experts Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-15 08:11 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 14:38 -0400
Re: OK, you experts DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:29 -0400
Re: OK, you experts Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 02:20 -0700
Is there any serious M$Office competitor yet? Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-04-17 02:27 -0700
Re: OK, you experts Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2016-04-20 14:05 +0100
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <neoht8$6qg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #349825 |
On 2016-04-14 11:28 AM, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-14, Silver Slimer <maGNUm@lin.sux> wrote: >> On 2016-04-13 8:07 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: >>> So, Microsoft using Linux for their switched fabric for Azure isn't an >>> omission that Linux is better than Windows for the task? Microsoft >>> working with Canonical to add a Linux layer within Windows to allow for >>> system call translation in order to run Linux apps, again so they can >>> cater to the Linux developer community is not capitulation? >> >> It simply means that Microsoft is providing _options_ to people who are >> looking to use their product. Rather than choosing UNIX and Linux and >> being stuck with the pool of mediocrity both products offer you, >> Microsoft's approach allows you to use things made for their platform IN >> ADDITION to things made for the others. In other words, you can use >> EVERYTHING rather than a small selection of open-source crap. > > HAHAHHA. Dude, you seriously having me laughing over here. I believe you > believe that, too. Here's what's really going on. Microsoft is not the > dominant player in the enterprise space. Considering my own school board and my wife's financial company migrated to a Microsoft solution, I don't believe you. Market shares also demonstrate that no, Linux is not "winning." > And the reality of it is > developers creating new business tied to the web are very likely using > Linux and Linux tools to do the job. In _your_ reality and that of the lying Linux losers. In the world's reality, that is not the case at all. The convenience that Microsoft brings to users and to the administrators cannot be matched by Linux at all. The only people opting for Linux solutions are the ones who were/are accustomed to UNIX software. Those who refuse to change and adapt like JEDIDUMBASS. > So Microsoft wants those developers > to consider using Azure rather than AWS or other platforms and in order > to do that they need to be less like Microsoft and more like Linux. Interesting hypothesis with no basis in reality. > So they keep their existing audience and they also try like hell to > offer tools that Linux developers like in the hopes that will make their > platform easier to adopt. Easier to adopt sure, but not to "keep" their existing audience. Their existing audience is already loyal to the company; this is just a new feature for them to play with. >>> Open Sourcing .net, buying Xamarin, open sourcing that, adding tools to >>> Eclipse and becoming a member and adding BASH, Vim, Emacs, etc to >>> Windows means what exactly to you? Sure as hell sounds to me like >>> Microsoft bent over backwards to cater to Linux and not the other way >>> around. >> >> It means that they did indeed decide to cater to people who like the way >> Linux handles things in certain aspects. It IS possible for people to >> prefer a Windows platform but, for instance, fall in love with Evolution >> and choose that for their e-mail. There's nothing wrong with that. >> Windows gives you OPTIONS, Linux makes you wish you had some. > > You are obviously clueless. Evolution email, which is a client, > has nothing to do with this subject at all. I was giving an example everyone would understand, thanks for following. > Developers have options, > and they chose Linux. That's why Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on > the enterprise. That's why they got crushed on super computers, stock > exchanges and a large percentage of the web-based infrastructure. _Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux. > Again, why is Microsoft using a Linux base to run Azure's switched > fabric? Why not use their own kernel? I have to laugh at you here. > Microsoft has admitted it in their business practices. Do you see them > eating their own dog food? No, you don't. > > Just like when we see Apple talk up their OS, and then run to Amazon and > Google for help on the data center rather than using their own OS. If > it's so great, use it why aren't they using OSX Server at scale? > HAHAHAHAHAH Pointless mention of OS X when we are talking about Windows. Try to stick to the subject. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 06:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dnbhfaFrp91U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #349842 |
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:56:18 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > _Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not > where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are > and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux. If you say so. -- -v "_Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 10:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qmn6uc-t57.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #349994 |
It was reported that vallor posted: > On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:56:18 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: > >> _Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not >> where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are >> and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux. > > If you say so. Uh, yeah. as if anyone's going to believe a lying psycho like little man Slimeball. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 08:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <neqlll$rio$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350005 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:09:14 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that vallor posted: > >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:56:18 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> _Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not >>> where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are >>> and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux. >> >> If you say so. > > Uh, yeah. as if anyone's going to believe a lying psycho like little man > Slimeball. Has intelligence caught up with the rest of your bloated body, William Poaster? Just wondering.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 19:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dncvclF8ojjU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #350005 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:09:14 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that vallor posted: > >> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:56:18 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> _Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not >>> where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are >>> and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux. >> >> If you say so. > > Uh, yeah. as if anyone's going to believe a lying psycho like little man > Slimeball. Oh, I happen to agree with what he said -- it's the most truthful thing I've seen from Slimer. Sure, he probably had a slip of the fingers, but that doesn't mean we can't skewer the wackadoodle with his own words. Read it again. -- -v "_Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 17:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nerlmb$r81$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350128 |
On 2016-04-15 3:57 PM, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:09:14 +0100, William Poaster wrote: > >> It was reported that vallor posted: >> >>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:56:18 -0400, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> >>>> _Nobody_ but lying Linux losers care about supercomputers. That's not >>>> where the money is either way. Desktops, workstations and servers are >>>> and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux. >>> >>> If you say so. >> >> Uh, yeah. as if anyone's going to believe a lying psycho like little man >> Slimeball. > > Oh, I happen to agree with what he said -- it's the most truthful thing > I've seen from Slimer. > > Sure, he probably had a slip of the fingers, but that doesn't mean we > can't skewer the wackadoodle with his own words. Read it again. It's all good if it makes you feel better. I was referring to servers, but if you're happy with what I DID say, all the power to you. -- Silver Slimer The silver-tongued heel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 19:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-a7f7f5123c34381e456b85b6a46588ba@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #349739 |
In article <i8qdnWJv1ojNQpPKnZ2dnUU7-dnNnZ2d@giganews.com>, Marek Novotny wrote: > > > Tattoo Vampire: > > > I'm not a computer programmer. > > > > > Why all the excitement about Bash being brought to Windoze? > > > > Silver Slimer: > > In the lying advocates' mind, it means that Linux won. > > So, Microsoft using Linux for their switched fabric for Azure isn't > an omission that Linux is better than Windows for the task? > Microsoft working with Canonical to add a Linux layer within Windows > to allow for system call translation in order to run Linux apps, > again so they can cater to the Linux developer community is not > capitulation? > Open Sourcing .net, buying Xamarin, open sourcing that, adding tools > to Eclipse and becoming a member and adding BASH, Vim, Emacs, etc to > Windows means what exactly to you? Sure as hell sounds to me like > Microsoft bent over backwards to cater to Linux and not the other > way around. Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs (ITS 1976) have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your point here. -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 12:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <eb399e04-72f2-4452-a17c-e4ee3a8d502a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #350126 |
On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 2:45:00 PM UTC-5, Sandman wrote: > Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs (ITS 1976) > have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your point here. Linux advocates think that anything non-Microsoft is Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 14:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hOidnREaZKQFw4zKnZ2dnUU7-WHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #350126 |
On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs (ITS 1976) > have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your point here. > That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... Maybe one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy of explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a lack of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I predict you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you went wrong. Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, also known as back peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know your subject first. You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 18:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nerpnq$cmf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350145 |
On 2016-04-15 5:35 PM, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs (ITS 1976) >> have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your point here. >> > > That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... Maybe > one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy of > explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a lack > of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I predict > you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you went wrong. > Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, also known as back > peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know your subject first. > > You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) Typical Linux advocate at work: "you're an idiot and if you question me on why, I'll call you an idiot again." -- Silver Slimer The silver-tongued heel
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 00:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dnde87Fddd5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #350145 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:35:20 -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs >> (ITS 1976) >> have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your point here. >> >> > That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... Maybe > one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy of > explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a lack > of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I predict > you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you went wrong. > Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, also known as > back peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know your subject > first. > > You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) Sandman is a mac advocacy troll. His schtick is to minimize the role of Linux in modern systems development. He probably doesn't believe what he writes, but who knows? -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 18:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <466cb7ab-7301-444c-affc-00884c5a6fdd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #350174 |
vallor wrote: > Marek Novotny wrote: > > > On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > >> Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and > >> emacs (ITS 1976) have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to > >> see your point here. > >> > >> > > That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... Maybe > > one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy of > > explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a lack > > of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I predict > > you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you went wrong. > > Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, also known as > > back peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know your subject > > first. Noted: Ad Hominem attack attempt, thereby avoiding the more honest approach of actually resolving the dispute with germane, objective verifiable facts. > > You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) > > Sandman is a mac advocacy troll. > > His schtick is to minimize the role of Linux in modern systems > development. He probably doesn't believe what he writes, but who knows? Also noted: a second Ad Hominem attack attempt, also choosing to avoid the honesty approach of resolving the dispute with germane, objective verifiable facts. - - - - - So then boys, rather than to try to continue to lamely "attack the person', how about you actually substantiate your claim? Otherwise, the point that Sandman made, namely that these products all very clearly existed long before Linux was born, is pretty damn indisputable. Thus, that MS adopting them has nothing to do with adopting Linux. As such, it is quite clear that you've now painted yourself into a logical corner that will require a working time machine to escape. After all, only a dishonest troll would avoid the simple approach of just directly pointing out the relevant facts that support and substantiate the 'cater to Linux' claim ... typically what those sorts of loser trolls do is to try to distract readers with some sort of irrelevant red herring, such as a lame Ad Hominem attack. Unfortunately for both of you, people aren't as stupid as you need them to be. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 21:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nes5jr$9he$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350193 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:46:25 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > vallor wrote: >> Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>> Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and >>>> emacs (ITS 1976) have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to >>>> see your point here. >>>> >>>> >>> That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... Maybe >>> one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy of >>> explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a lack >>> of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I predict >>> you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you went wrong. >>> Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, also known as >>> back peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know your subject >>> first. > > Noted: Ad Hominem attack attempt, thereby avoiding the more honest approach > of actually resolving the dispute with germane, objective verifiable facts. > >>> You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) >> >> Sandman is a mac advocacy troll. >> >> His schtick is to minimize the role of Linux in modern systems >> development. He probably doesn't believe what he writes, but who knows? > > Also noted: a second Ad Hominem attack attempt, also choosing to avoid the > honesty approach of resolving the dispute with germane, objective verifiable facts. > > - - - - - > > So then boys, rather than to try to continue to lamely "attack the person', how > about you actually substantiate your claim? This is a Linux group where pathological lying, as long as it is positive to Linux, is accepted. If that were not true, 7 would have been ignored by all years ago. The problem is whimps like Chris Ahlstrom who are so afraid of his own shadow he won't go up agains the Linux advocates cartel even when he knows they are lying. And he's not the only one. There are many more.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 02:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dndmdpFddd5U8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #350193 |
On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:46:25 -0700, -hh wrote: > vallor wrote: >> Marek Novotny wrote: >> >> > On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> >> Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs >> >> (ITS 1976) have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your >> >> point here. >> >> >> >> >> > That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... >> > Maybe one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy >> > of explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a >> > lack of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I >> > predict you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you >> > went wrong. Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, >> > also known as back peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know >> > your subject first. > > Noted: Ad Hominem attack attempt, thereby avoiding the more honest > approach of actually resolving the dispute with germane, objective > verifiable facts. > >> > You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) >> >> Sandman is a mac advocacy troll. >> >> His schtick is to minimize the role of Linux in modern systems >> development. He probably doesn't believe what he writes, but who >> knows? > > Also noted: a second Ad Hominem attack attempt, also choosing to avoid > the honesty approach of resolving the dispute with germane, objective > verifiable facts. > > - - - - - > > So then boys, Fuck off. > rather than to try to continue to lamely "attack the > person', how about you actually substantiate your claim? Because a person's reputation is not a logical argument, it is their reputation: a myriad of many factors, including past behavior. "Hugh"'s reputation, for example, is that he is an apologist for extremely nasty trolls, making all sorts of machinations to try to twist what they do into something worthy of even being read. We're talking libel and defamation, not just insults. By the way, "hh", you are a pretentious piece of eurotrash-wannabe. Kindly die in a fire. Now that we've established where this wackadoodle is wrong above, lets move on to what is sure to be more of him being wrong: > > Otherwise, the point that Sandman made, namely that these products all > very clearly existed long before Linux was born, is pretty damn > indisputable. > Thus, that MS adopting them has nothing to do with adopting Linux. MS adopting ubuntu userspace includes a syscall translator with the filename lxss.sys. While one might think that it would be called "Linux subsystem for Windows", it is actually being referred to as "Windows subsystem for Linux". No matter what they call it, it is clear that Linux is very much involved with the project. And in the demonstrations Microsoft streamed from their Build conference, it was clear that they were proud that the lxss was the avenue that would give them vim, emacs, and so forth. So to pretend that Ubuntu's support for these applications is somehow not relevant is extremely disingenuous. As per usual from cola trolls. Like "hh". > > As such, it is quite clear Whenever some clown says something is "quite clear", watch out, they will try to sell you your own hat. > that you've now painted yourself into a > logical corner that will require a working time machine to escape. Except, the premises of "hugh's" argument are suspect, which makes his argument suspect. Further, it could be argued that what follows from his premises do not necessarily support the conclusions, which would make his argument unsound, too. This, coupled with the fact that "hugh's" arguments have been irrelevant for many years, leads me to the conclusion that it would serve no further purpose to continue with this discussion. However, I'm curious what he's written below, so I will dive in and see what it looks like: > > After all, only a dishonest troll would avoid the simple approach of > just directly pointing out the relevant facts that support and > substantiate the 'cater to Linux' claim ... typically what those sorts > of loser trolls do is to try to distract readers with some sort of > irrelevant red herring, such as a lame Ad Hominem attack. So an ad hominem attack, such as hugh referring to people he disagrees with as "only a dishonest troll" and "loser trolls", is quite fine by him. Besides the attempt at role-reversal, it would seem "hugh" thinks that following up an (alleged) ad hominem argument with another ad hominem argument is somehow logical. No, that is the "you too" fallacy. http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#tuquoque So, irrelevant and illogical. "Hugh" remains in my snubbery, his posts are not worth the bits they are printed on. > Unfortunately for both of you, people aren't as stupid as you need them > to be. Note the formulaic ending, as if his magical incantation somehow will make his abusive post "all right". This frequent saying in COLA is a parting shot that implies that a poster "needs their audience to be stupid". The only "stupid" people around here are those who would give any credence to such a laughably asinine display of faux-logic, one that comes across as ineffective, pretentious, and pathetic. "You would need a time machine! Harhar, behold my brilliance!" > > > -hh ...and though he has been corrected more than once on how to make a proper sig, he continues to leave his little hugh turds in his posts, all the while claiming "that's the way it's always been, so that's the way it should be." http://infidels.org/library/modern/mathew/logic.html#antiquitatem In short: Logic is not Hugh's strong suit. He is, though exceptional at _pretending_ to be logical. -- -v "Desktops, workstations and servers are and Microsoft is doing very well. AS well as Linux." -"Slimer"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-15 22:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nes9hs$jpp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350210 |
On 16 Apr 2016 02:30:17 GMT, vallor wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:46:25 -0700, -hh wrote: > >> vallor wrote: >>> Marek Novotny wrote: >>> >>> > On 2016-04-15, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>> >> Seeing how open source, bash (BSD 1988), vim (Amiga 1991) and emacs >>> >> (ITS 1976) have exactly nothing to do with Linux, I fail to see your >>> >> point here. >>> >> >>> >> >>> > That's because you're clueless. You'll figure it out... Or not... >>> > Maybe one of your more enlightened friends will do you the courtesy >>> > of explaining it to you. Me, I just love it when an idiot displays a >>> > lack of knowledge in a subject he chooses to argue about. Now I >>> > predict you'll run back to google and wikipedia and see where you >>> > went wrong. Then you'll feel all embarrassed and the clarification, >>> > also known as back peddling will begin. Word to the foolish... Know >>> > your subject first. >> >> Noted: Ad Hominem attack attempt, thereby avoiding the more honest >> approach of actually resolving the dispute with germane, objective >> verifiable facts. >> >>> > You may begin your back peddling now... I can't wait... :) >>> >>> Sandman is a mac advocacy troll. >>> >>> His schtick is to minimize the role of Linux in modern systems >>> development. He probably doesn't believe what he writes, but who >>> knows? >> >> Also noted: a second Ad Hominem attack attempt, also choosing to avoid >> the honesty approach of resolving the dispute with germane, objective >> verifiable facts. >> >> - - - - - >> >> So then boys, > > Fuck off. He nailed you Bloaty. >> rather than to try to continue to lamely "attack the >> person', how about you actually substantiate your claim? > > Because a person's reputation is not a logical argument, it is their > reputation: a myriad of many factors, including past behavior. I wouldn't go there if I were you Bloaty. You will lose big time. > "Hugh"'s reputation, for example, is that he is an apologist for > extremely nasty trolls, making all sorts of machinations to try to twist > what they do into something worthy of even being read. We're talking > libel and defamation, not just insults. HH seems logical and maybe a bit sterile and detail oriented. You OTOH are strange and nasty. All this OBLinux crap is just plain weird. > By the way, "hh", you are a pretentious piece of eurotrash-wannabe. > Kindly die in a fire. And you eat too much and don't exercise enough. > Now that we've established where this wackadoodle is wrong above, lets > move on to what is sure to be more of him being wrong: Stop borrowing my word. >> >> Otherwise, the point that Sandman made, namely that these products all >> very clearly existed long before Linux was born, is pretty damn >> indisputable. >> Thus, that MS adopting them has nothing to do with adopting Linux. > > MS adopting ubuntu userspace includes a syscall translator with the > filename lxss.sys. While one might think that it would be called "Linux > subsystem for Windows", it is actually being referred to as "Windows > subsystem for Linux". No matter what they call it, it is clear that > Linux is very much involved with the project. Geek noise. Microsoft is in business to make money. If they can con you Linux losers into giving away your software so be it. Oops, you loons already do that. Fools. > And in the demonstrations Microsoft streamed from their Build conference, > it was clear that they were proud that the lxss was the avenue that would > give them vim, emacs, and so forth. So to pretend that Ubuntu's support > for these applications is somehow not relevant is extremely disingenuous. Who cares? You and a handful of other clueless geeks? > As per usual from cola trolls. Like "hh". He doesn't look like a troll to me. You OTH do look like a netkopper troll. > >> >> As such, it is quite clear > > Whenever some clown says something is "quite clear", watch out, they will > try to sell you your own hat. When someone says "fuck you" as their opening salvo, they don't follow up with a pile of shit commentary like you just did. >> that you've now painted yourself into a >> logical corner that will require a working time machine to escape. > > Except, the premises of "hugh's" argument are suspect, which makes his > argument suspect. Further, it could be argued that what follows from his > premises do not necessarily support the conclusions, which would make his > argument unsound, too. Logic isn't your strong point is it Bloaty? > This, coupled with the fact that "hugh's" arguments have been irrelevant > for many years, leads me to the conclusion that it would serve no further > purpose to continue with this discussion. However, I'm curious what he's > written below, so I will dive in and see what it looks like: Linux as a competitor to Windows desktop has been irrelevant for years. About 21 in fact. >> >> After all, only a dishonest troll would avoid the simple approach of >> just directly pointing out the relevant facts that support and >> substantiate the 'cater to Linux' claim ... typically what those sorts >> of loser trolls do is to try to distract readers with some sort of >> irrelevant red herring, such as a lame Ad Hominem attack. > > So an ad hominem attack, such as hugh referring to people he disagrees > with as "only a dishonest troll" and "loser trolls", is quite fine by him. And you are a spineless netkopper. > Besides the attempt at role-reversal, it would seem "hugh" thinks that > following up an (alleged) ad hominem argument with another ad hominem > argument is somehow logical. No, that is the "you too" fallacy. I'll bet you would love to reverse your role. After all, just about anyone or anything would be an improvement over your sad current state. Has anyone told you that you look like Jabba The Hutt? You do. Slimer is right. Scott Doty (vallor) really does look like Jabba The Hutt. Scott: https://www.sonic.com/sites/default/files/headshots/Scott-Color-6_0.jpg Jabba https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/87/Jabba_the_Hutt.png They could be cousins! You are boring me.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 06:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <net5ja$gc6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350210 |
Crosspost to alt.usenet.k00ks, the natural home of people like -highhorse, snipped. vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:46:25 -0700, -hh wrote: > > <much snippage> > > In short: Logic is not Hugh's strong suit. He is, though exceptional at > _pretending_ to be logical. You spent an awful lot of time and energy on that nitwit. How many farragos of half-truths, truths taken out of context and spun into something nasty, outright lies, country-hick propaganda techniques, childish ridicule, basic scatology, kookrants, ragefail, griefing, and plank-thick stupidity does one have to answer before just adding them to the fuckwit filter? Score: =-9999 Message-ID: .*40tude.net.* Score: =-9999 From: DFS.* Score: =-9999 From: "Ezekiel" Score: =-9999 From: .*dizum\.com Score: =-9999 Organization: .*dizum\.com.* Score: =-9999 From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger\.com> Score: =-9999 From: Desk Rabbit <me@example\.com> Score: =-9999 From: Steve Carroll Score: =-9999 From: .*Anonymous.* Score: =-9999 From: Dave U\. Random <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter\.net> Score: =-9999 From: .*Slimer.* Score: =-9999 From: flatfish\+\+\+ <phlatphish@yahoo\.com> Score: =-9999 From: cc <scatnubbs@hotmail\.com> Score: =-9999 From: Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201406\.rodent\.frell\.theremailer\.net> Score: =-9999 Subject: .*pee-pee.* Score: =-9999 Subject: .*beaver.* Score: =-9999 References: .*remailer.* Score: =-9999 From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity\.com> Score: =-9999 References: .*gallopinginsanity.* Score: =-9999 References: .*40tude.net.* Score: =-9999 References: .*isis.* Score: =-9999 From: John Gohde <john\.h\.gohde@gmail\.com> Score: =-9999 From: GreyCloud.* Score: =-9999 From: Lloyd.* Score: =-9999 From: Jeff-Relf.* Score: =-9999 From: owl <owl@rooftop\.invalid> Score: =-9999 From: Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo\.com> Score: =-9999 From: Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail\.org> -- Debian Hint #41: You can use 'apt-cache show <package_name>' or 'aptitude show <package_name>' to get more information about a debian package.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 13:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mrn9uc-246.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #350276 |
It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: > Crosspost to alt.usenet.k00ks, the natural home of people like -highhorse, > snipped. > > vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:46:25 -0700, -hh wrote: >> >> <much snippage> >> >> In short: Logic is not Hugh's strong suit. He is, though exceptional at >> _pretending_ to be logical. > > You spent an awful lot of time and energy on that nitwit. > > How many farragos of half-truths, truths taken out of context and spun into > something nasty, outright lies, country-hick propaganda techniques, childish > ridicule, basic scatology, kookrants, ragefail, griefing, and plank-thick > stupidity does one have to answer before just adding them to the fuckwit > filter? > > Score: =-9999 > Message-ID: .*40tude.net.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: DFS.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: "Ezekiel" > > Score: =-9999 > From: .*dizum\.com > > Score: =-9999 > Organization: .*dizum\.com.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > From: Desk Rabbit <me@example\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > From: Steve Carroll > > Score: =-9999 > From: .*Anonymous.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: Dave U\. Random <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter\.net> > > Score: =-9999 > From: .*Slimer.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: flatfish\+\+\+ <phlatphish@yahoo\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > From: cc <scatnubbs@hotmail\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > From: Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201406\.rodent\.frell\.theremailer\.net> > > Score: =-9999 > Subject: .*pee-pee.* > > Score: =-9999 > Subject: .*beaver.* > > Score: =-9999 > References: .*remailer.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > References: .*gallopinginsanity.* > > Score: =-9999 > References: .*40tude.net.* > > Score: =-9999 > References: .*isis.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: John Gohde <john\.h\.gohde@gmail\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > From: GreyCloud.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: Lloyd.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: Jeff-Relf.* > > Score: =-9999 > From: owl <owl@rooftop\.invalid> > > Score: =-9999 > From: Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo\.com> > > Score: =-9999 > From: Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail\.org> Score:=-9999 Message-ID:.*googlegroups\.com* Score:=-9999 Organization:.*Kulin Remailer Score:=-9999 Path:.*aoie\.org Score:=-9999 Path:.*nym\.alias\.net Also cuts off a lot of their "oxygen". -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 08:42 -0400 |
| Subject | OK, you coo coo trolls |
| Message-ID | <netc0d$j2j$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350284 |
William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: > >> Crosspost to alt.usenet.k00ks, the natural home of people like -highhorse, >> snipped. >> >> . . . >> >> Score: =-9999 >> From: Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo\.com> >> >> Score: =-9999 >> From: Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail\.org> > > Score:=-9999 > Message-ID:.*googlegroups\.com* > > Score:=-9999 > Organization:.*Kulin Remailer > > Score:=-9999 > Path:.*aoie\.org > > Score:=-9999 > Path:.*nym\.alias\.net > > Also cuts off a lot of their "oxygen". Oxygen? I was under the impression that these coocoos had anaerobic metabolism. They keep spewing their inane drivel even when their targets don't read it. -- Debian Hint #10: There are Debian mailing lists for everything from user questions to debates over what to put into the Debian Policy documents. Check out the list at http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ and subscribe to those that interest you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 09:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: OK, you coo coo trolls |
| Message-ID | <netd91$nuh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #350286 |
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 08:42:03 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: >> >>> Crosspost to alt.usenet.k00ks, the natural home of people like -highhorse, >>> snipped. >>> >>> . . . >>> >>> Score: =-9999 >>> From: Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo\.com> >>> >>> Score: =-9999 >>> From: Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail\.org> >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Message-ID:.*googlegroups\.com* >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Organization:.*Kulin Remailer >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Path:.*aoie\.org >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Path:.*nym\.alias\.net >> >> Also cuts off a lot of their "oxygen". > > Oxygen? I was under the impression that these coocoos had > anaerobic metabolism. They keep spewing their inane drivel even > when their targets don't read it. You must be a riot at parties. NOT!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-16 14:23 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OK, you coo coo trolls |
| Message-ID | <f0r9uc-d3f.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #350286 |
It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: > William Poaster wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> It was reported that Chris Ahlstrom posted: >> >>> Crosspost to alt.usenet.k00ks, the natural home of people like -highhorse, >>> snipped. >>> >>> . . . >>> >>> Score: =-9999 >>> From: Me Sham <osirus47@yahoo\.com> >>> >>> Score: =-9999 >>> From: Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail\.org> >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Message-ID:.*googlegroups\.com* >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Organization:.*Kulin Remailer >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Path:.*aoie\.org >> >> Score:=-9999 >> Path:.*nym\.alias\.net >> >> Also cuts off a lot of their "oxygen". > > Oxygen? I was under the impression that these coocoos had > anaerobic metabolism. Apparently they often nymshift, so surely that would be an amoeba metabolism? Which would also account for their (one) brain cell capacity. > They keep spewing their inane drivel even when their targets don't read it. They probably do. AFAIC they can rant & froth all they like, I rarely see their puerility. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.9 Kernel: 4.5.0-10.1.gb98c3d3-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 11 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux This message is virus free, as absolutely NO Micro$oft products were used in its preparation. "If you do want to clean your computer of malware, the first software to delete is Windows." http://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-microsoft.en.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web